Inglourious Bastards - Thread contains spoilers

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 7, 2003
6,046
1
0
#83
Why?
Becuase it made you jump and the guys head moving from the hits was good

That was an action scene?
Guy hits another man with a baseball bat. Find the action in the sentence? (think back to 3rd grade sentence structure)

What action sequences were in it?
you saw the movie i dont need to retype the scenes you seen


That's your justification for it not being over done? :rolleyes:
it wasnt over done, but it was satire what the jews did to the germans becuase what really happend in real life


You must laugh at anything.
im laughing at your opinion right now
thats my opinion
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
38
#85
i personally thought it was a good movie. it was prolly one of his worst but i like all of QT's movies. my favorite was the jew hunter, his role made the whole movie and he was basically the main character. and lol at the movie being called inglorious basterds when there only in like 4 scenes
 
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#86
Thwe actor who played the jew hunter was the best actor in the whole movie. I say he gets a nod at best supporting actor.
I liked the movie overall.
I was really hoping it would focus on the basterds stomping through france taking scalps.
but what I got was not expected and I liked it. the theater ending was cool because most writer/directors would probably make it opposite than what happened.
 
Nov 15, 2007
1,761
0
0
37
#87
props to the last 2 post, i agree with what they said...


and cold blooded you have hated on alot of movies i like, you are trying to hard to be the siskel and ebert of the siccness and it doesnt work.... fuck your opinion!
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#90
It felt like a spaghetti western dressed as a war movie to me, could see not liking it if one's not a fan of them.
Once Upon A Time In The West is my favorite spaghetti western so maybe that's why I didn't like this movie.

Liking those movies is why I thought Kill Bill 2 was better than Vol 1.
 
Aug 7, 2003
6,046
1
0
#92
coldblooded, your going way out of your way to say this movie sucks. like we all should listen to your opinion because its the only one that matters. your one fag on the siccness who doesnt like this movie. there are probably some like you but the majority of the people who saw this movie liked it. if you dont like it why keep going in a thread about it just to say it sucks and argue with people. spend your time doing something else.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#93
^^lol @ getting your feelings hurt because someone doesn't like a movie that you do.

I haven't even seen the movie and I know it sucks. That's how badly I hate QT movies, he hasn't made a good film since Pulp Fiction imo. Are you going to cry and call me a fag now?

Fuck QT and his herpe dick
 
Aug 7, 2003
6,046
1
0
#95
^^lol @ getting your feelings hurt because someone doesn't like a movie that you do.

I haven't even seen the movie and I know it sucks. That's how badly I hate QT movies, he hasn't made a good film since Pulp Fiction imo. Are you going to cry and call me a fag now?

Fuck QT and his herpe dick
no, ill call you a fag becuase you are a fag.

and why would you post around 10 replies in a topic based on a movie you hate or didnt like. makes so sense. i hate the raiders but you dont see me going in the raiders thread and hating on them on 10 seperate occassions.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
43
#96
Saw the movie last night.. it wasn't as good as I had hoped but it was plenty good enough. The opening scene was great, I couldn't even blink because I was so drawn to it. That was, unfortunately, the most interesting point of the film. Christoph Waltz did an outstanding job and deserves to be recognized for it, and I believe he is the one who "made" the film worthwhile. I am actually a fan of Brad Pitt and I must say, while at some points I liked the way he portrayed his character (his first scene) there were other parts where I couldn't even watch him (at the premier of the movie "nations pride"). The music didn't bother me but it did nothing to improve the film. I thought the acting was good, and while I do think Pitt is a good actor, it seemed like no one was coaching/directing his parts and they just let him do/say whatever he wanted. Some parts were funny, others had no business being in this movie. Storyline was good and original. Movie could have been better but for big QT fans this is probably a gem. I advise everyone to see this movie!
 

Kyle

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
1,304
1
0
40
#97
I saw it a couple of hours ago...it was OK, but not great. My main complaint is that unlike other Tarantino movies, the supposed to be funny parts aren't funny. And although it's not the movie's fault I get annoyed by pretentious viewers that laugh a fucking storm up at anything they kinda 'get' if you know I'm saying. I thought it was kinda slow moving, but at least it didn't feel the full 2 1/2 hours. It's worth watching once.
 
May 30, 2006
7,310
71
0
46
^^lol @ getting your feelings hurt because someone doesn't like a movie that you do.

I haven't even seen the movie and I know it sucks. That's how badly I hate QT movies, he hasn't made a good film since Pulp Fiction imo. Are you going to cry and call me a fag now?

Fuck QT and his herpe dick
What movies and filmmakers do u lke? just wondering cuz I'm kind of baffles at ur comments about QT