Before Cotto fought Pac-man he had a war with Stone-Hands a KO loss, then in his next fight he had a war with Cottley a decision win. Mosley last two fights before Mayweather, KO win over Mayorga and a KO win over Stone-Hands. Why does Mayweather get no credit for beating up Mosley but Pac-Man gets credit for beating up Cotto? Now this is not hard folks don't dodge the question with a silly comment just explain your logic behind your answer to the question at hand. I'll be waiting..
Who is not giving credit for beating Mosley? Floyd does get credit.
Technically, you left out the fact that Mosley lost to Cotto, beat Mayorga which means nothing and on top of that looked pretty bad against him up until the final round and had a year and a half layoff before fighting floyd. Still he gets credit but you left that shit out while criticizing pacquiao which only makes it more obvious how biased you are.
Still you fail to realize that Pacquiao was a 135 pound fighter only a year ago. He is NOT the same size as floyd, who has been a 147 pounder for 6 years now. What Pac has done, gone from 130 to 147 in a year and a half, and beat the top guys, is impressive
Mayweather has a great win over Mosley. That's it in three years. Pac has had great wins for the past several years now.
Both are great fighters.
Both are the best in the sport.
They need to fight eachother.
What else is there to debate? Fight and prove who's the best. That's it.