Is E Dawg Racist
- Thread starter Dak iller
- Start date
- Status
#1. All nationalities are good at basketball nowadays and there are whiteboys now going to the NBA directly from highschool BUT my point was that everytime there is something Blacks seemed to be good at or start to dominate, new laws are implemented to change that verdict.
#2. God is of all people and so is black blood. Blacks are the original man. "Eve" (that what the scientist are calling the oldest bones discovered) was found in Africa. Again black skin is a dominant trait and white skin is recessive. Coarse hair is a dominant trait. What other culture fits this description?
Phillipinos? This is where the black first ventured to after leaving Africa.
Aberiginees? Man swam from the Phillipines to Australia when water levels were thousands of feet lower.
And so forth. All coming from the black man. I know one other thing. The bible didn't say blonde and blue eyes now did it?
#2. God is of all people and so is black blood. Blacks are the original man. "Eve" (that what the scientist are calling the oldest bones discovered) was found in Africa. Again black skin is a dominant trait and white skin is recessive. Coarse hair is a dominant trait. What other culture fits this description?
Phillipinos? This is where the black first ventured to after leaving Africa.
Aberiginees? Man swam from the Phillipines to Australia when water levels were thousands of feet lower.
And so forth. All coming from the black man. I know one other thing. The bible didn't say blonde and blue eyes now did it?
If you're not racist then you're ignorant. You talking about if it wasn't for a war, that blacks might still be slaves, what is that saying? That we should be lucky or something? Do you actually think shit wouldn't have changed had we not had the civil war? Slaves were already beginning to rebel and escape. The civil war had to happen dude! It wasn't cuz a white man cared that much for blacks.
Which white men were hunted, captured, & forced into slavery for 400 years? Were captivated & made to be Lab rats for a test on the affects of Syphillis? Were killed for simply looking at a black woman? Were forced to sit at the back of the bus or classroom? How many white men in the Civil War had pants too short, & shoes too small? Do you know the ratio on white & black deaths in the Civil War? I didn't think so.
Which white men were hunted, captured, & forced into slavery for 400 years? Were captivated & made to be Lab rats for a test on the affects of Syphillis? Were killed for simply looking at a black woman? Were forced to sit at the back of the bus or classroom? How many white men in the Civil War had pants too short, & shoes too small? Do you know the ratio on white & black deaths in the Civil War? I didn't think so.
And if I may add my .02 cents......
NOBODY........I repeat NOBODY knows who the "original man" is. Why? Because none of us were there. And if I remember correctly.....they have already found pre-historic remains somewhere else older than the discovery in Africa that so many people like to use for their arguments.
They just found a new line of pre-humans that nobody knew existed too.......they're finding new shit everyday.......so who's to say what is what? Where and who? Nobody REALLY knows.......
More importantly though..............WHO REALLY GIVES A FLYING FUCKIN' RATS ASS? We're all here now........
NOBODY........I repeat NOBODY knows who the "original man" is. Why? Because none of us were there. And if I remember correctly.....they have already found pre-historic remains somewhere else older than the discovery in Africa that so many people like to use for their arguments.
They just found a new line of pre-humans that nobody knew existed too.......they're finding new shit everyday.......so who's to say what is what? Where and who? Nobody REALLY knows.......
More importantly though..............WHO REALLY GIVES A FLYING FUCKIN' RATS ASS? We're all here now........
Africans wern't the first people because there was no Africa during out beginnings. The land mass we call "Africa" wasn't anywhere near where it is today. Not only was the climate different but so was landscape. What are now deserts used to be tropical. There wern't 7 continents like there are today. There were two major land masses that were still connected by a huge land-bridge, which is usually referred to as a (the) single continent.
Thanks to DNA research, science has now proven the 'out-of-africa' theory to be false. There is no one original person that started it all. It is now fact that our ancestors evolved multi-regionally and inter-bred with each other. People seem to forget that race and species are two different things. The races as we know them today didn't exist until recent modern-human history, meaning within the last couple hundred thousand years. If you arn't really on top of the new discoveries being made concerning human evolution, it's almost a garauntee that what you think you know has been completely re-written. Genetics don't lie and neither does DNA.
By the way, whoever said that two white people can't make a black baby... You're wrong. If you do a little research on this, you'll be suprised by what you find out. And it has nothing to do with people having 'jungle-fever'.
Anyways... Racism is not exlusive to rich white people. Slavery is not exclusive to black people. Somewhere down the line you are going to have to accept the fact that all races have been both the 'master' and the 'slave' at some point in history. And both by their own race and other races as well.
Thanks to DNA research, science has now proven the 'out-of-africa' theory to be false. There is no one original person that started it all. It is now fact that our ancestors evolved multi-regionally and inter-bred with each other. People seem to forget that race and species are two different things. The races as we know them today didn't exist until recent modern-human history, meaning within the last couple hundred thousand years. If you arn't really on top of the new discoveries being made concerning human evolution, it's almost a garauntee that what you think you know has been completely re-written. Genetics don't lie and neither does DNA.
By the way, whoever said that two white people can't make a black baby... You're wrong. If you do a little research on this, you'll be suprised by what you find out. And it has nothing to do with people having 'jungle-fever'.
Anyways... Racism is not exlusive to rich white people. Slavery is not exclusive to black people. Somewhere down the line you are going to have to accept the fact that all races have been both the 'master' and the 'slave' at some point in history. And both by their own race and other races as well.
D-Sane
i know about those pre-human ancestors they found out about...
they did find that skull in Africa tho'
funny thing is...
the first HUMANS as we know them today...settled in the south of france FROM AFRICA...they basically left africa to the south of france...
which means...nothing i guess...
just interesting
i know about those pre-human ancestors they found out about...
they did find that skull in Africa tho'
funny thing is...
the first HUMANS as we know them today...settled in the south of france FROM AFRICA...they basically left africa to the south of france...
which means...nothing i guess...
just interesting
Villian, this is the first reply that I heard from you that didn't have a racist or controversial statement in it.
I can dig all that.
Again, I've only given facts and I don't mind talking about the issue. Communication is the answer to everything. If we don't talk about it, how we gonna change it?
Just like if I didn't tell some of you that some of those statements yall made that you thought were positive weren't being perceived that way, you wouldn't know. Now would ya?
At any rate, if anyone thinks I'm racist, so what!
If anyone thinks I don't know what I'm talking about, then teach me something that I will agree with.
And if you feel you have something to say, ask yourself this first?
#1. Where am I trying to go with this statement?
#2. Am I making a valid point or just defending my race by speaking?
AND
#3. Am I offending others by presenting this statement in this fashion?
D-Sane don't erase shit, this is healthy and should be discussed. We should know what we think about each other and our cultures. Since we are all of the human race let's act like it. Let's talk.
If we aren't allowed to talk about it, what you thinks gonna happen next? I'll tell you. It's only gonna get worse with other being more ignorant.
I can dig all that.
Again, I've only given facts and I don't mind talking about the issue. Communication is the answer to everything. If we don't talk about it, how we gonna change it?
Just like if I didn't tell some of you that some of those statements yall made that you thought were positive weren't being perceived that way, you wouldn't know. Now would ya?
At any rate, if anyone thinks I'm racist, so what!
If anyone thinks I don't know what I'm talking about, then teach me something that I will agree with.
And if you feel you have something to say, ask yourself this first?
#1. Where am I trying to go with this statement?
#2. Am I making a valid point or just defending my race by speaking?
AND
#3. Am I offending others by presenting this statement in this fashion?
D-Sane don't erase shit, this is healthy and should be discussed. We should know what we think about each other and our cultures. Since we are all of the human race let's act like it. Let's talk.
If we aren't allowed to talk about it, what you thinks gonna happen next? I'll tell you. It's only gonna get worse with other being more ignorant.
Well it's clearly evident that we are getting off the real topics at hand.
The only reason I mentioned that Black men were first was because I was informing someone that Italians already had black in their blood. That's it. I'm not trying to say Black are better in anyway. If half of you could take a moment to just really listen to what I or SH have presented, it is in no way an attack on any race.
However, you can't sweeten up a horror story. So you can't talk about America's past without talking about alot of cruel events and things that people may not want to hear.
And to correct you, you didn't prove anything wrong.
The only reason I mentioned that Black men were first was because I was informing someone that Italians already had black in their blood. That's it. I'm not trying to say Black are better in anyway. If half of you could take a moment to just really listen to what I or SH have presented, it is in no way an attack on any race.
However, you can't sweeten up a horror story. So you can't talk about America's past without talking about alot of cruel events and things that people may not want to hear.
And to correct you, you didn't prove anything wrong.
Re: And if I may add my .02 cents......
Bro, the only thing they discovered is an older black. You did finish watching the show didn't you? So even if they try and say it was not in Africa, which it was with the new bones as well, then they are still black. This is fact and their is no discovery of any white bones anywhere remotely close to either of these bones at that time. I'm not degrading or putting down white in any way by making this statement.
Blacks are the original man, but this means nothing other than it being the truth. If you have six kids, you don't love the oldest one more because it's the first. You love them all the same.
So don't attempt to take my factual statements and twist them into a racist rebuttle.
Exactly, I told everyone why I brought it up. It was a dead issue then. Only those looking for something to say, or who wanted to deny the truth continued bringing it up.
Bro, the only thing they discovered is an older black. You did finish watching the show didn't you? So even if they try and say it was not in Africa, which it was with the new bones as well, then they are still black. This is fact and their is no discovery of any white bones anywhere remotely close to either of these bones at that time. I'm not degrading or putting down white in any way by making this statement.
Blacks are the original man, but this means nothing other than it being the truth. If you have six kids, you don't love the oldest one more because it's the first. You love them all the same.
So don't attempt to take my factual statements and twist them into a racist rebuttle.
Exactly, I told everyone why I brought it up. It was a dead issue then. Only those looking for something to say, or who wanted to deny the truth continued bringing it up.
It may not have been labeled Africa but it is the exact same locale.
Please inform me where this information is because I recently watched a show where they are still in Africa talking about most of the comments D-Sane made.
No one hear is debating the differences between race and species. You're opening a whole new can of worms. Our can is full already. And I'm pretty current on this dicussion so please add your 2 cent and any referrals you can to the table.
I'm even more interested in knowing where your supposed source is on this one. Look at all the people you know, I've seen blacks have albino and very bright children but I still have yet to see two pale people produce a dark brown skin child. Something like that is so rare that it would definitely make TV (especially in this age of the TALK SHOW). If that were possible then interacial children that derive from a pale human and a dark brown human could come out as dark, if not darker than the dark parent. You don't see this either.
All this is still getting away from the main focus. If you want to talk about that, start a new thread because we can talk about this for days as well.
Please inform me where this information is because I recently watched a show where they are still in Africa talking about most of the comments D-Sane made.
No one hear is debating the differences between race and species. You're opening a whole new can of worms. Our can is full already. And I'm pretty current on this dicussion so please add your 2 cent and any referrals you can to the table.
I'm even more interested in knowing where your supposed source is on this one. Look at all the people you know, I've seen blacks have albino and very bright children but I still have yet to see two pale people produce a dark brown skin child. Something like that is so rare that it would definitely make TV (especially in this age of the TALK SHOW). If that were possible then interacial children that derive from a pale human and a dark brown human could come out as dark, if not darker than the dark parent. You don't see this either.
All this is still getting away from the main focus. If you want to talk about that, start a new thread because we can talk about this for days as well.
TRUE, I don't recall anyone sayin it was. I remember SH saying something about HATE + POWER, which is debatable for many but she never mentioned a race.
TRUE, I don't recall anyone saying this either. Who are you talking to with all this?
Again you talking out the side of your neck. I didn't deny any of this. However, no race has been the slave for such a long period (400 years). Not one antique, bible, or any other form of data states this "so-called" fact that is spewing from your mouth.
Let's stick with the real subjects, my take:
E-Dawg aint racist. Blacks have been wronged in the past and this is no excuse for any wrongs blacks have done. No White person knows what it is like to be black. Half of you defensive guys that are attacking my statements do have racist perceptions (on certain issues) and I can honestly say that yall don't even know it. And blacks are the original man, whether you like or not, deal with it. However, this means nothing. This gives us no power over any race.
Now if you still mad about that, you and anyone else has personal issues.
TRUE, I don't recall anyone saying this either. Who are you talking to with all this?
Again you talking out the side of your neck. I didn't deny any of this. However, no race has been the slave for such a long period (400 years). Not one antique, bible, or any other form of data states this "so-called" fact that is spewing from your mouth.
Let's stick with the real subjects, my take:
E-Dawg aint racist. Blacks have been wronged in the past and this is no excuse for any wrongs blacks have done. No White person knows what it is like to be black. Half of you defensive guys that are attacking my statements do have racist perceptions (on certain issues) and I can honestly say that yall don't even know it. And blacks are the original man, whether you like or not, deal with it. However, this means nothing. This gives us no power over any race.
Now if you still mad about that, you and anyone else has personal issues.
a short, non-arguementative reply.
Have you ever heard it said that less than 1% of americans control over 90% of the money in america? Racism is the same way.
Add up all the biggest towns you can think of, and they're less than 20% of the total population. That means 80% of all racism goes on in towns like mine...
(...Unless i should switch my major to Mathematics...??)
Have you ever heard it said that less than 1% of americans control over 90% of the money in america? Racism is the same way.
Add up all the biggest towns you can think of, and they're less than 20% of the total population. That means 80% of all racism goes on in towns like mine...
(...Unless i should switch my major to Mathematics...??)
Look at the next quote. (You arent too bright.)
That war wasnt over slaves, it was over politics. If southerners had to PAY their workers,it means less $$$. The north was trying to FORCE them to have less money in their pockets..so then, the war happened............NOT because Tom Smith in the north "loved black people, and even had 3 black friends!" and Cletus Dilbeck was an all-out racist who hated blacks......GET YOUR HISTORY STRAIGHT!!!
UHM...HELLO? CAN YOU READ THIS? If so then you can read when some FUCKING IDIOT said that JEWS were the first humans...damn, now YOU'RE the one spinning things, and AGAINST YOUR OWN "SIDE" too! You should be ashamed...
If you dont watch at LEAST 3 hours of news media every day (with a focus on Bill O'Reilly), you WILL NOT WIN this debate. No matter WHAT you say OR how you say it...
That war wasnt over slaves, it was over politics. If southerners had to PAY their workers,it means less $$$. The north was trying to FORCE them to have less money in their pockets..so then, the war happened............NOT because Tom Smith in the north "loved black people, and even had 3 black friends!" and Cletus Dilbeck was an all-out racist who hated blacks......GET YOUR HISTORY STRAIGHT!!!
UHM...HELLO? CAN YOU READ THIS? If so then you can read when some FUCKING IDIOT said that JEWS were the first humans...damn, now YOU'RE the one spinning things, and AGAINST YOUR OWN "SIDE" too! You should be ashamed...
If you dont watch at LEAST 3 hours of news media every day (with a focus on Bill O'Reilly), you WILL NOT WIN this debate. No matter WHAT you say OR how you say it...
You left out the footnote.....oh, and your own opinion too...you left that out as well. Thanks for typing out a history book page for us, though. Even though you left out key phrases like "were believed to be deserts" or "were thought to have been tropical"....good shit!
You cant 'prove' time with the use of DNA. No computer is that smart yet.....you big ole genius, you.
Uh, fact? What? did i miss something? If this is fact, why dont they teach it in school? You know why? Because its a THEORY, not a FACT...even if its a widely-accepted theory, it is STILL THAT--a THEORY. Even if 10 billion scientists belived it...unless one of them was 10 billion years old...ITS A THEORY!!
** skips over the rhetoric-saturated garbage paragraph **
I think what they said was that 2 black people can make a white baby. So stop philosophically BITCHING, especially when it turns out to be COMPLETELY USELESS rhetoric.
In America...in terms of duration...YES, BOTH ARE INDEED TRUE!!!
Overall, you get a 3 for your post...out of 100. thanks for trying! I hope you enjoyed your stay! We hope to see you back soon.....good luck.....batteries not included...shipping extra...thats about it.
You cant 'prove' time with the use of DNA. No computer is that smart yet.....you big ole genius, you.
Uh, fact? What? did i miss something? If this is fact, why dont they teach it in school? You know why? Because its a THEORY, not a FACT...even if its a widely-accepted theory, it is STILL THAT--a THEORY. Even if 10 billion scientists belived it...unless one of them was 10 billion years old...ITS A THEORY!!
** skips over the rhetoric-saturated garbage paragraph **
I think what they said was that 2 black people can make a white baby. So stop philosophically BITCHING, especially when it turns out to be COMPLETELY USELESS rhetoric.
In America...in terms of duration...YES, BOTH ARE INDEED TRUE!!!
Overall, you get a 3 for your post...out of 100. thanks for trying! I hope you enjoyed your stay! We hope to see you back soon.....good luck.....batteries not included...shipping extra...thats about it.
- Status