Originally posted by Sick Wid It Those phrases wern't used because they would have made the statements inaccurate. There are a lot of things that 'were thought to be' only a few years ago that have since been proven by dedicate research. Why do you think they dig deep down into the ground and take core samples? Why do you think they analyze petrified animal shit? Why do you think they do all the field-research they do? Because it gives definitive answers to the things that are 'thought to be'.
So let I get this straight: Scientists still cant agree on how humans lived
10 thousand years ago, but EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM would be 'incorrect' if they disagreed with everything you just listed to be 'definitive' in your previous statements about
10 billion years ago? 95% of what you said were, AT BEST, slight exaggerations. NOTHING more, and NOTHING 'proven'.
I guess you think you said something slick here. No, you can't measure exact dates in time thru analyzing DNA but it can give you a pretty accurate timeline. "you big ole genius, you."
You don't have to have lived in prehistoric times to discover facts about the world and stuff in it. I won't even waste my time getting into this because it's obvious from your.....comment, that you arn't very educated on the subject.
"Pretty accurate" does not and will not EVER cut it in the scientific community...Sci
means KNOWLEDGE, not 'pretty accurate guesses.' Here's a few words of advice: DONT MESS WITH PHILOLOGISTS! I know the in-depth meaning of nearly every word you use, so if you attempt to 'pull a fast one', i WILL notice!
You wanna speak about education? Go take a few upper level english classes, and learn how to express yourself, with a particular focus on philosophical forums frequented by those dependant on philological rationale and logic-based discussion....and pick up a dictionary/thesaurus too, because your vocabulary is lacking.