ioish & 2-0-Sixx > christians
- Thread starter Fucky McFuckerson
- Start date
Mathematics is responisble for bullshit 0+ (7 to the 2nd power years) = my dog old as shit then dead = me sad and depressed = 2 + the 2 wrinkles on my forehead = me feeling like more shit for a grand sum of SHIT.
Really the point I'm making is people are fucked up not the things they name/reorganize/"make". Math is nuetral that's the point your making, so is religion, it's how you apply the two and for what reasons that give them value in the human world.
Really the point I'm making is people are fucked up not the things they name/reorganize/"make". Math is nuetral that's the point your making, so is religion, it's how you apply the two and for what reasons that give them value in the human world.
I THINK YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT OF THE BIBLE, BRO
a lot of moral lessons are learned in the bible...just like most holy books.
a lot having to do with finding yourself and listening to your conscience.
science cant even define what a conscience is lol
science cant provide anything like that. never have never will.
a lot of moral lessons are learned in the bible...just like most holy books.
a lot having to do with finding yourself and listening to your conscience.
science cant even define what a conscience is lol
science cant provide anything like that. never have never will.
I'm not missing the point, I'm actually just taking the bullshit in the book literally. And how does Christianity define what a conscience is? Sure, scientists might be incapable of understanding what a conscience really is, but that mystery can be realized through the mastering of Yoga. Humans do have some god-like superpowers.
Sorry, rushing if some things are left out, don't have many breaks. I'm not an advocate of religion but I really don't care what people believe/follow in, I do, however, care about what they do with those beliefs.
I think it's better to just argue that you don't believe in religion than throw science into it everytime.
Science is neutral, while religion has value judgements attached to it, ok, but then when we start to say religion is bad because it makes poeple do bad things on false premises, then science is implicated in a lot of nasty things as well. Here's a series of thoughts I think are interesting to think about when you compare the virtues of science to the ills of religion : 1st, Science is right and has given justification to bad things; 2nd, Religion should be ignored because it propagates ignorance, part of that ignorance leads to bad things; 3rd, Science is not right because it has supplied reason for bad things just like religion; 4th, Science is the means, but so what? The ends only count - which in this case religion is absolved of it's burden.
I think it's better to just argue that you don't believe in religion than throw science into it everytime.
Science is neutral, while religion has value judgements attached to it, ok, but then when we start to say religion is bad because it makes poeple do bad things on false premises, then science is implicated in a lot of nasty things as well. Here's a series of thoughts I think are interesting to think about when you compare the virtues of science to the ills of religion : 1st, Science is right and has given justification to bad things; 2nd, Religion should be ignored because it propagates ignorance, part of that ignorance leads to bad things; 3rd, Science is not right because it has supplied reason for bad things just like religion; 4th, Science is the means, but so what? The ends only count - which in this case religion is absolved of it's burden.
i can't tell if your trolling us or not... if you real go enroll in a community college general bio class. You sound like a retard.
its called Genes. The giraffes that died never passed on traits, the ones that lived past on the DNA with head cushion, and as population grew those genomes. DNA is ever evolving, sometimes for benefit, often times for worse. The same thing apply to dog breeds... you saying if humans can breed a wolves into a chihuahua, the earth over billions of years can't shape biological species?
no its a branched lineage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_afarensis
we all fall under the same umbrella, but not same lineage. Like comparing sharks to tuna's
its called Genes. The giraffes that died never passed on traits, the ones that lived past on the DNA with head cushion, and as population grew those genomes. DNA is ever evolving, sometimes for benefit, often times for worse. The same thing apply to dog breeds... you saying if humans can breed a wolves into a chihuahua, the earth over billions of years can't shape biological species?
no its a branched lineage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_afarensis
we all fall under the same umbrella, but not same lineage. Like comparing sharks to tuna's