Honestyiskey said:
What are you on about? Mexicans dont give A shit about Natives? thats bullshit! My mother is A Native from Mexico, she knows the struggles of being indigenous just as much as A Native from the states.. and California did belong to Mexico
Haha! Like I said before, this is a wretched lie!! Your personal experience account is selective and has nothing to do with the amalgamation of culture that persisted during and after Spanish colonization of the Americas that generally affected those directly influenced and it was unavoidable that this would create a dichotomy between indigenous cultures and assimilated foreign cultures. Along with history I observe it in some form all the time (I really do), "Mexican" is a separate identity and they tend to look down on Natives, period. Same can be said for a lot of post-colonial African natives in regards to their attitudes towards Diasporians or "Obrunis"..
Honestyiskey said:
it was taken away from Mexico just like other states in the southwest.. Mexicans only claim indigenous blood when its convinient?? whoa! that's a first.. first of all if youre talking about the people who created the ''Mexica Movement'' that was founded in the early 90's by young Xicano, and Central & South American people and Cuban/PuertoRican taino descendants.. it wasnt founded last year or for the immigrant marches.. and if Mexicans arent Indigenous then tell me why racists consider us ''illegal indians'' if you dont believe me visit stormfront for your concrete evidence..
1. What is a "Mexican" and how long have they existed?
2. Who did "Mexicans" take the land from before it was in turn, taken from them?
^Good example is Texas.. Texas was never "Mexican" territory, the majority of the SouthWest (including parts of modern Mexico, until they got ran out) belonged to the Dine (Navajo) and Apache.. Geronimo himself recalled raids from Mexico that killed damn near his entire family.
http://www.answers.com/topic/apache
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navajo_people
Using separatist movements as a reference doesn't help your argument either and you only enhanced my point. Either way it doesn't exemplify any ideals of the masses since as you say, these people were Native Americans who simply recognized the fact that they were Native Americans, and embraced it while condemning anything European-imposed, unlike Spanish speaking "Mexicans" who embrace "Mexican" culture.
As far as Mexicans not being indigenous, I never said that, though it is peculiar that according to the U.S. Census reports, a big bulk of Mexicans actually identify as "White", and not Native American.
Honestyiskey said:
about Haitans, if you didnt know they are also in this battle for Immigrant rights! only the media doesnt show you that side, why? for the most part I dont know, contact them.. but it's mostly about ''Latinos'' if you look at it from the S.O.S. or MinuteMen point of view.. I've NEVER met another ''Latin American'' who does not take pride in their Native culture - go to Peru, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil even.. they all have Indigenous movements! it's the government that do not take care of them and the real Issues of Central & South America.. Only Mexicans a victim of past atrocities?? What kind of A mindset is that man..
Firstly, 1 or 2 separatist movements isn't enough to represent an entire cultural legacy, there's nothing to infer from that. About Haiti, well there are no minute men on the Florida coasts, maybe there would be if they didn't need the coast guard, but this wasn't my point, just pointing out a double standard, are we to allow all immigrants free access into the country? If not, then what makes Mexicans so special that they deserve it more than Haitians? I never addressed ''Latin America'' as a monotypic whole and I never claimed that Mexicans are the only victims, my point was that they weren't. And my mind state is sober..