Boxing schedule for the month of September

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#83
Hatton was one of the best out there. Top 10 easily.
It's funny how people easily bash world class fighters. Sure he lost to Floyd, but that was at 147 and at the tail end of his career. He lost to Manny as well. Hatton was still a great fighter.

Cotto is a bad dude. Montiel is one of the best as well.

Just because you aren't P4P or top 5 doesn't mean you aren't good.
There are probably over 100,000+ boxers out there. Give some of these guys some credit.
 
Jul 21, 2002
8,158
665
0
42
Oklahoma
www.youtube.com
#84
Hatton had no place at 147. I would've had a lot more respect for Floyd if he would've fought Hatton at 140lbs but it wouldn't have mattered. We all know this story. Hatton wasn't a top 10 P4P to me but he had some good wins and you can't take that away from him and I thought he had a chance against Floyd because he used to be really good at moving his head side to side on his way in and he would attack the body. Not sure if Floyd was just too fast or if he had stopped doing that as much by that point in his career but he just seemed to be walking straight in against Floyd.

Cotto has had a damn good career. Never been a fan but you can't discredit the guy.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#85
Vitali vs Adamek will be live at 1:45 on HBO, or you can watch it delayed in combination with the Gamboa fight later tonight on HBO as well.

Prescott vs McClowsky should be starting soon as well.

anyone know a good alternative to myp2p? that shit was shut down and that was my go to site for all sporting events.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#88
I thought Prescott pulled it off. It was pretty close but here was my card


Prescott | McClowsky
________________
1. 10 | 8
2. 10 | 9
3. 10 | 9
4. 9 | 10
5. 9 | 10
6. 10 | 9
7. 10 | 9
8. 9 | 10
9. 9 | 10
10. 10 | 9
11. 9 | 10
12. 10 | 9

115|112
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#89
Man that was a serious beat down. Adamek's still got some good money coming his way based on his popularity and the fact that he can still beat some guys at heavy. His people should be reaching out to Sosnowski as soon as possible.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
42
#93
Seems to me Gamboa wasnt being reckless which is a good thing imo. Why risk gettng caught with something when he was easily picking dude apart? HBO just wants nonstop action, Gamboa fought the smart fight
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#94
Gamboa looked OK tonight. I just don't see how he's leaps and bounds above Broner with this fight performance. Adamek took a bad asswhipping.
 
Jul 21, 2002
8,158
665
0
42
Oklahoma
www.youtube.com
#95
Gamboa looked OK tonight. I just don't see how he's leaps and bounds above Broner with this fight performance. Adamek took a bad asswhipping.
because he cruised to victory and only engaged when he wanted to and still really outclassed a better than decent fighter that Broner struggled with. How are you not getting that?
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#98
Dude landed 25 more punches then Ponce's. Again I saw nothing in the fight that made me scream that Gamboa is leaps and bounds better then Broner.
 
Feb 8, 2006
2,617
1,373
0
40
#99
Gamboa didnt look good to me, fighting with his hands down, cant box for shit, no defense, was running around the ring like a bitch(thats not boxing btw)never engaged, if Ponse was so easy put him too sleep lol, HBO bigging him up like hes the badest thing(too funny). I musta watched a diffrent fight, cause yall talking about Gamboa like he whooped somebody, far from the truth. get your own mind and stop listening to HBO commentators, their very biased.