Well its looks like NASH is gonna be MVP
- Thread starter I. Cold
- Start date
This was in response to your banwagon comment, i dont want a cookie, just tryin to emphasize that im no where near a banwagon fan
why your gettin so worked up and saying i dont know shit is beyond me. Homie i know shit, probably more than you. I know that Nash is probably the worst player to get the mvp in history (Besides bob cousy who won it back in the day shooting a fg percentage of 37%) Nash didnt have the same impact on the NBA as a whole that kobe or lebron did. Again theres not much i can say because you give these sports journalists way to much creditablity. Until you figure out how much of a joke sports journalism is, you probably will never understand how the mvp award works.
What does all of that have to do with the on-court performance?? This has been the main question posed to writers, who continue to write bad articles about Kobe despite is excellence on the court. Even if Kobe raped 300 women and massacred 90 people, it shouldnt matter because its what he does on the hardwood. Most sports writers let the outside happenings influence what they think about him. No one wants to vote a alleged rapist, and no one wants to support a prick. But to say that what happend in colorado didnt effect the MVP race in 2006 is str8 up ignorant.
i think you need to get real, Most of these guys are not as "genius" as you make them out to be. I read my share of articles and the things they write are sometimes completely incorrect. Accuracy with these sports writers is not something that they strive for. And just cuz its their job doesnt mean their good at it. I mean would you respect an article written by the Ying Yang twins about the art of MCing? Its their job? They put a lot of work into it! you see what im saying? anyways you probably wont. With that being said there still is a minority of writers who keep it real, and their basketball knowledge shows in their articles. Like Charlie Rosen, writes for fox sports, he may be a big kobe hater, but he can write in depth articles.
lol, man what im typing really goes over your head, let me explain this more. The instant kobe's two feet were off the ground, Nash's leg was still sliding into position. Kobe was in the act of shooting, before nash was set, maybe by a split second. Regardless, that would never have been called, and shouldnt be called because this is the playoffs and this is the NBA, when your 6'3" and have limited vertical leap, when you are slow to rotate, get out of the way.
why your gettin so worked up and saying i dont know shit is beyond me. Homie i know shit, probably more than you. I know that Nash is probably the worst player to get the mvp in history (Besides bob cousy who won it back in the day shooting a fg percentage of 37%) Nash didnt have the same impact on the NBA as a whole that kobe or lebron did. Again theres not much i can say because you give these sports journalists way to much creditablity. Until you figure out how much of a joke sports journalism is, you probably will never understand how the mvp award works.
What does all of that have to do with the on-court performance?? This has been the main question posed to writers, who continue to write bad articles about Kobe despite is excellence on the court. Even if Kobe raped 300 women and massacred 90 people, it shouldnt matter because its what he does on the hardwood. Most sports writers let the outside happenings influence what they think about him. No one wants to vote a alleged rapist, and no one wants to support a prick. But to say that what happend in colorado didnt effect the MVP race in 2006 is str8 up ignorant.
i think you need to get real, Most of these guys are not as "genius" as you make them out to be. I read my share of articles and the things they write are sometimes completely incorrect. Accuracy with these sports writers is not something that they strive for. And just cuz its their job doesnt mean their good at it. I mean would you respect an article written by the Ying Yang twins about the art of MCing? Its their job? They put a lot of work into it! you see what im saying? anyways you probably wont. With that being said there still is a minority of writers who keep it real, and their basketball knowledge shows in their articles. Like Charlie Rosen, writes for fox sports, he may be a big kobe hater, but he can write in depth articles.
lol, man what im typing really goes over your head, let me explain this more. The instant kobe's two feet were off the ground, Nash's leg was still sliding into position. Kobe was in the act of shooting, before nash was set, maybe by a split second. Regardless, that would never have been called, and shouldnt be called because this is the playoffs and this is the NBA, when your 6'3" and have limited vertical leap, when you are slow to rotate, get out of the way.
Wow, this thread took off in a hurry..
Biased? Come on man. I don't wanna get into an exchange of insults with you again, but let's be real for a moment. Nobody is being biased or plotting against Kobe Bryant. I'm a Sacramento Kings fan, I hate the Lakers, but I think Kobe is the best player in the NBA right now. I do not hate Kobe, I enjoy watching him play because he is exciting.. I thought he was definately in the running for MVP, without a doubt, but so was Nash and so was LeBron James. They were all deserving. If you really must know why I believe Steve Nash does deserve the MVP just read the first post of this thread. I already explained why Kobe didn't get the award, so I'll leave it at that.
Anyway, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Regardless of who is the league MVP, none of the three front-runners are getting a championship. It's just a fuckin MVP award, it shouldn't mean that much to you people. I think Shaun Alexander is the most undeserving NFL MVP in recent history because it was his O-Line that did most of the work, but you don't see me throwing a fit and arguing with people about who should have really been the MVP. Sure, I made a few comments about his O-Line deserving it more than he does, but that's it. It's not that big a deal. So, who gives a fuck?
Biased? Come on man. I don't wanna get into an exchange of insults with you again, but let's be real for a moment. Nobody is being biased or plotting against Kobe Bryant. I'm a Sacramento Kings fan, I hate the Lakers, but I think Kobe is the best player in the NBA right now. I do not hate Kobe, I enjoy watching him play because he is exciting.. I thought he was definately in the running for MVP, without a doubt, but so was Nash and so was LeBron James. They were all deserving. If you really must know why I believe Steve Nash does deserve the MVP just read the first post of this thread. I already explained why Kobe didn't get the award, so I'll leave it at that.
Anyway, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Regardless of who is the league MVP, none of the three front-runners are getting a championship. It's just a fuckin MVP award, it shouldn't mean that much to you people. I think Shaun Alexander is the most undeserving NFL MVP in recent history because it was his O-Line that did most of the work, but you don't see me throwing a fit and arguing with people about who should have really been the MVP. Sure, I made a few comments about his O-Line deserving it more than he does, but that's it. It's not that big a deal. So, who gives a fuck?
Jordan was far better than Kobe. He was not as selfish, he was a better defender, and he made his teammates perform at a higher level. There is no comparison between Kobe and Jordan.
No thanks to Kobe. Unless they tried harder because they were being left out so badly.. Either way he did not directly and deliberately try to help them perform at a higher level.
No thanks to Kobe. Unless they tried harder because they were being left out so badly.. Either way he did not directly and deliberately try to help them perform at a higher level.
I dont think anyone deserves to be MVP
Kobe = awesome player, NO ONE can deny he's tight, but hasn't made his team better like Nash or Lebron
Nash = makes everyone around him tight, deserved it LAST YEAR, but the 2 years in the row thing makes NO sense..how many championships he got? A 2nd year MVP gotta deliver the goods...he might get it this year..who knows
Lebron = incredible..better than Kobe when it comes to gettin his team mates involved, but still too young
It's a tough decision...I'd say no one gets it..or should I say really deserves it
Kobe = awesome player, NO ONE can deny he's tight, but hasn't made his team better like Nash or Lebron
Nash = makes everyone around him tight, deserved it LAST YEAR, but the 2 years in the row thing makes NO sense..how many championships he got? A 2nd year MVP gotta deliver the goods...he might get it this year..who knows
Lebron = incredible..better than Kobe when it comes to gettin his team mates involved, but still too young
It's a tough decision...I'd say no one gets it..or should I say really deserves it