I havent missed a laker game all season and maybe missed 3-4 games in the past 5 years, and ill tell y'all this much, Kobes teamates are young, inexperianced, and at some instances undeserving to play at the nba level. Lamar Odom has been underachieving 3/4s of the regular season, and single handedly lost 3-4 games (e.g. road game against Sac-town, Lakers up 4 points with 30+ seconds on the game clock, full 24 on the shot clock, Odumb doesnt run the clock, instead he drives 3 seconds into the shot clock and gets a charge. Turnover Sactown takes advantage, Lakers lose). They have 2 nbdl players running the point (smush and sasha) And if you actually watch laker games, its quite obvious that these PG's cant D up, and on Pick and roll defense they are horrific which is understandable b/c they are young. Kwame has avg 6pts and 6rebs the whole year, he just started to play well. The laker bench is non existant, George was the best bench performer by far, Luke walton and cook have been defensive liabilities the whole year. Again these are young players, whom, as the season passed improved. So you have Players on this team who probably shouldnt be in the league on this team.
Also the lakers are the 2nd youngest team in the Western Conference, and 3rd in the league, The younger teams in front of them are Portland and ATL, now let me ask you where those teams stand as of now?? The lakers are tied in a playoff series with the division leader, those teams are tryin to decide who they gonna draft..So this talk about nash having the same calibur of teamates as Kobe is ignorant.
Now the main difference between ATL and Portland and the lakeshow is the Lakers have kobe, and the others dont. And heres another question i'll pose to the nash apologists:
would the lakers be in the playoffs if they had nash instead of kobe??
I think its pretty damn obvious they would be a 30 win team w/nash not a 45 win team. Nash needs good players around him to suceed, Odom would not of meshed well with Nash because Odom needs the ball in his hands to be effective. Plus the lakers dont have the shooters that the suns have (Jones, Bell, House, Barbosa all very competant 3 point shooters, kobe and cook are the only laker players who have been consistant perimeter shooters all year). Now put kobe on the suns, they are a 60 win team, with championship aspirations.
Plus all this hype around Nash has really put Shawn Marion, the true Mvp of the suns, in the shadows, You saw the 2 playoff games right? The suns struggled (and they admitted they struggled in both games) even tho nash had great games, but Marion was struggling. The suns need Marion to be Marion to be the great team they were in the early regular season. Marion having the season he's having should be receiving more credit for carrying this team w/out amare than hes been recieveing.
Per 48 min nash gives up more points then he scores, what kind of mvp does that? B-ball is 50/50, defense and offense. Nash is probably the bes t PG in the league, but thats the most credit i would give him.
Y'all can hate all you want on Kobe, the dudes is the best in the game right now, and 10 years from now, 2006 nba season is gonna be notorious for Kobe droppin 81, kobe droppin 62 in 33 minutes of play, kobe breaking Elgin Baylors records. Nash is going to be a trivia question. Nash can have his mvps, Im sure he'd trade his two MVP trophies and his hair cut for the 3 rings kobe got on his fingers.