@ sixxness
I'd say it's been made clear why he believes what he believes.
No, it has not because you continue to assume why he has so-called racist beliefs. Until one of you questions him (and not in an accusatory manner) you will continue to go over the same thing.
WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR ONE OF YOU TO ASK HIM WHY HE HAS THESE VIEWS? WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR THOSE CALLING HIM A RACIST TO ASK HIM SPECIFICS TO HIS SO-CALLED RACISM?
Specific details to his life are irrelevant.
No, specific details
ARE relevant. He has a
RIGHT to hold the beliefs that he does, but you (and others) are afraid to aks him
WHY he holds these beliefs. If you are saying he is a racist and imply or state racism is wrong you need to address the
ROOT of the problem. YOU ARE OVERLOOKING THE
CAUSE TO HIS SO-CALLED RACISM, AND THAT IS A BIG MISTAKE. STOP ASSUMING AND DEMAND THAT HE GIVE AN ACCOUNT OF HIMSELF.
If one can't grasp why EDJ believes what he does, they aren't reading what he says, they're just looking at the words like a fuckin picture book.
Why should one grasp (which ACTUALLY means assume in this instance) why EDJ believes what he does, when ANY and ALL misconceptions can be cleared up by requiring EDJ to clarify and elaborate?
I may disagree with him quite a bit but it's not hard to understand where he's coming from.
If you do NOT understand the motivation behind his so-called racism you are just as guilty as he is.
@Nitro
Maybe we are assuming because he has not explained himself.
So why not ask him to explain himself? I've said this for YEARS, but to date not ONE person has ever asked this man WHY he believes what he does.
It works both ways. Being in his position with people already speculating, I would have explained myself a long time ago.
That is what YOU would have done. However, there is no
accountability when people SPECULATE and form OPINIONS. There
IS accountability when someone asks you WHY you are a so-called racist and require you to validate (or attempt to validate) your position/beliefs.
But thats beside the point because I can ask--or require--him to explain himself, and supposing he does, I will be no further than I am right now, and I will ask the SAME questions.
1. If you do ask him he is now accountable because you are no longer making assumptions. If you are no longer assuming, you are getting it from the horses mouth, and he can no longer make the claim that you are assuming or forming misconceptions. If he
FAILS to answer you are now
JUSTIFIED in your assumptions and assessments.
2. His ANSWERS will dictate if you are further or at a stand still. If he answers you in detail you will know have knowledge about his so-called racism and the motivation behind it. If you do not understand the driving force it is hard to attack his position.
Listen, if I say a nazi is racist because of experience what am I basing this on? How do I know the
EXPERIENCE is
RACIALLY MOTIVATED? What if the experience of the nazi is similar to Remy from higher learning? That being, having experienced
REJECTION everywhere he went, he finally fit in with those who accepted him?
I am confused as to why that is so hard to understand. I am not so concerned with his racism as I am with how he is hypocritical in his use of it.
How is he being hypocritical in his use of it?