The Proof I Promised

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#42
2-0-Sixx said:
You didn't prove shit! Does that make it a prophecy? Please explain it to me.
A prophecy is a prediction.
1) This prediction was made before the bith of Jesus
2) Jesus was born in Bethlehem.
3) Jesus was the spiritual ruler of the Jews. Messiah is the annointed one. Only kings would be annointed.
This seems to be a correct prediction.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#43
2 "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
though you are small among the clans of Judah,
out of you will come for me
one who will be ruler over Israel,
whose origins are from of old,
from ancient times.
Still doesn't sound like much of a prophecy.

Whatever, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. This gives you one. Want a cookie? Does this prove anything?

Also, as I mentioned from the start, one has to assume these "prophecies" occured. Do you have proof jesus was born in bethlehem? Do you even have proof jesus was born?
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#44
2-0-Sixx said:
Still doesn't sound like much of a prophecy.

Whatever, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. This gives you one. Want a cookie? Does this prove anything?

Also, as I mentioned from the start, one has to assume these "prophecies" occured. Do you have proof jesus was born in bethlehem? Do you even have proof jesus was born?
When its written hundreds of years before the birth of Jesus I would call it a very good and acurate prophecy. It proves that that prophecy was correct. I have no proof that Jesus was born in betlehem aside from the scriptures, you I guess won't take them as proof. But as to the fact that Jesus was born (or ever lived which I guess is what you're looking for, because if he was never born and just appeared then that would give the theist an edge) look into Tacitus.
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#45
2-0-Sixx said:
So I guess it's not biased to look at them as the "Truth", right?
Not when you take into consideration that you were unbiased when the Truth was presented.

How can you be biased by accepting the absolute truth?

I guess according to you, siding with the truth is a bias towards truth.
I see what you mean haha!
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#46
It can't be the "truth" without undeniable proof. Prove it to me, and I will believe you.

Some people in this thread seem to take their own personal beliefs as the absolute truth...On both sides, but the side with less evidence for it is Christianity. We've got people not wanting to reply because they can't refute what someone said even though they argued it so much in another thread. I just don't get how people say it's the "truth" just because they read it and believed it. But the thing I'm realizing is that different shit proves stuff to different people. Those people I guess just haven't come to realize their "proof" is a bunch of crap-ola.
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#47
How can you find the truth if you don't look for it?
You have yet to take the journey, how can you become familiar with the destination?

I am challenging every non believer to study all religions before making a judgement call.
Look at how many of you discredit the belief in God but know so little about the concept?

Stop looking with your eyes, and look with your minds....
 

shep

Sicc OG
Oct 2, 2002
3,233
2
0
#48
miggidy said:
How can you find the truth if you don't look for it?
You have yet to take the journey, how can you become familiar with the destination?

I am challenging every non believer to study all religions before making a judgement call.
Look at how many of you discredit the belief in God but know so little about the concept?

Stop looking with your eyes, and look with your minds....
there it is... when a theist is cornered, they get philosophical.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#50
miggidy said:
And 2-0,
your responses to Commando's posted prophecies are a joke.
More on that tomorrow.

Good night everyone....
Thank you miggidy for calling my reply a joke. Forget the fact that I spent hours on that shit.

For the record, it wasn't in reply to commando, please go back and check again. And miggidy, the only joke on this thread is you.

I asked for the prophecies over and over. NO ONE would post them. I had to waste my precious time looking that bullshit up. I could have spent my time learning about science, something that can actually help humanity, something that actually EXISTS, but no, I foolishly flushed hours of my time down the toilet just so I can prove to everybody how freakin retarded these prophecies are.

You and Commando...it's like debating 6 year olds...scratch that. Its like debating sub-human, extra-chromosome, Corky mutherfuckers. There is absolutely not one once of logic between the two of you. Fuck, Commando wouldn't even admit leprechauns don't exist for crying out loud! What amazing things are you going to say tomorrow? Are you going to point out how I was wrong? WOW. What a fucking suprise! After all, you know the TRUTH!, right?

"Look 2-0-Sixx, it says right here that Jesus was born with two feet!! its the TRUTH!"
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#51
2-0-Sixx said:
You and Commando...it's like debating 6 year olds...scratch that. Its like debating sub-human, extra-chromosome, Corky mutherfuckers. There is absolutely not one once of logic between the two of you. Fuck, Commando wouldn't even admit leprechauns don't exist for crying out loud! What amazing things are you going to say tomorrow? Are you going to point out how I was wrong? WOW. What a fucking suprise! After all, you know the TRUTH!, right?
[/b]
Thank you for the compliment. :dead:
Secondly I cannot scientifically or logically disprove leprechauns don't exist so why should I admit they don't? Where is the logic there? Like I asked (i think sixx) prove to me you have a grandfather. You can't. For all you know 2-0 you are a clone.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#52
miggidy said:
I am challenging every non believer to study all religions before making a judgement call.
Look at how many of you discredit the belief in God but know so little about the concept?

Stop looking with your eyes, and look with your minds....

WOW! What great words from the all-TRUTH-knowing miggidy! I'll take your challenge! I'm going to research all 1,000+ religions that have ever existed and I'll get right back at ya when I'm finished! Hows that?

While I'm doing that, I challenge all TRUTH knowers to study evolution, DNA, biology, Mathematics, geology, physics, Acoustics, Neurology, Ecology, Agronomy, Archaeology, Bacteriology, Biochemistry, Cosmology, Genetics, Microbiology, Physiology, Botany, Astronomy, Chemistry, Anatomy, Embryology, Astrophysics, and Geophysics.
Study all of that before making a judgement call, ok?
When your finished with all of that, study psychology and tell me why people are so stupid that they would make comments like yours. :dead: :hurt: :dead:
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#53


MEXICANCOMMANDO said:
Thank you for the compliment. :dead:
Secondly I cannot scientifically or logically disprove leprechauns don't exist so why should I admit they don't? Where is the logic there? Like I asked (i think sixx) prove to me you have a grandfather. You can't. For all you know 2-0 you are a clone.
You never asked me that question.

What is empirical evidence? Empirical evidence is:
-Evidence that can be independently verified through objective means.
-Evidence that can be independently verified by anyone who chooses to do so.
-Evidence that exists of its own accord regardless of one's belief in it or not.

In short, the only kind of evidence that is valid is evidence that is empirically gathered. This requires using the scientific method to gather this evidence. Here is a brief introduction to the scientific method for those of you who don't know what that is.

I suggest you click on the link and learn how us amazing people can find out if things are true or false. wow, we must be gods!
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#54
2-0-Sixx said:
You never asked me that question.
Sorry. I thought I differentiated enough. 2-0 = 2-0 sixx and Sixx = Sixxness (or it might have been shep) anyways the challenge stands: prove to me you had a grandfather beyond any doubt.
2-0-Sixx said:
What is empirical evidence? Empirical evidence is:
-Evidence that can be independently verified through objective means.
-Evidence that can be independently verified by anyone who chooses to do so.
-Evidence that exists of its own accord regardless of one's belief in it or not.
agreed.
2-0-Sixx said:
In short, the only kind of evidence that is valid is evidence that is empirically gathered. This requires using the scientific method to gather this evidence. Here is a brief introduction to the scientific method for those of you who don't know what that is.
Good ol' scientific method. (not sarcastic by the way)
2-0-Sixx said:
I suggest you click on the link and learn how us amazing people can find out if things are true or false. wow, we must be gods!
Just because one is religious does not mean they shun science.
The thing is you are asking us to prove the impossible whereas we (me namely) are asking you to disprove the impossible.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#55
2-0-Sixx said:
WOW! What great words from the all-TRUTH-knowing miggidy! I'll take your challenge! I'm going to research all 1,000+ religions that have ever existed and I'll get right back at ya when I'm finished! Hows that?

While I'm doing that, I challenge all TRUTH knowers to study evolution, DNA, biology, Mathematics, geology, physics, Acoustics, Neurology, Ecology, Agronomy, Archaeology, Bacteriology, Biochemistry, Cosmology, Genetics, Microbiology, Physiology, Botany, Astronomy, Chemistry, Anatomy, Embryology, Astrophysics, and Geophysics.
Study all of that before making a judgement call, ok?
When your finished with all of that, study psychology and tell me why people are so stupid that they would make comments like yours. :dead: :hurt: :dead:
I know your post is sarcastic. But how is what Migg said any different than what shep said? And I quote:
"1. study all religions and you will see"

Link:

http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=101134&page=11&pp=15

Should both their posts be ridiculed? Or should only Miggidy's be looked at like this because he is the theist?
 

shep

Sicc OG
Oct 2, 2002
3,233
2
0
#56
MEXICANCOMMANDO said:
I know your post is sarcastic. But how is what Migg said any different than what shep said? And I quote:
"1. study all religions and you will see"

Link:

http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=101134&page=11&pp=15

Should both their posts be ridiculed? Or should only Miggidy's be looked at like this because he is the theist?
you don't know me man, so you don't know what i studied, so i'ma lay it out for you. i'm a religious studies minor (and a history major), so i probably know more than you do.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#57
2-0-Sixx said:
What is empirical evidence? Empirical evidence is:
-Evidence that can be independently verified through objective means.
-Evidence that can be independently verified by anyone who chooses to do so.
-Evidence that exists of its own accord regardless of one's belief in it or not.
MEXICANCOMMANDO said:

MEXICANCOMMANDO said:
and Sixx = Sixxness anyways the challenge stands: prove to me you had a grandfather beyond any doubt.
I knew you meant me....

So if you agree with what he said, why did you ask me to prove it? You want the proof? I AM. Me. Sittin right here. I am proof that my great great whatever existed. Bringing up that clone shit is fucking ridiculous bro, so don't even try to pull those cards anymore, COME UP WITH SOMETHING CONCRETE. Not your little "what ifs" and shit.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#58
This is always one of the last resorts of the theist. "How do you know _______? How do you know you are here? How do you know blah blah fucking blah" Well, the same way I know that when I drop an apple it will not fall up. As difficult as this may sound, there are certain laws of life. How do we know they are laws? Because they will ALWAYS occur and we can test them. We know dogs don't give birth to humans. We know we will die without oxegyn. etc. Sixxness is right. How are you going to agree with what I posted and they say some stupid "what if?"
I know I have a grandpa because I am alive. I am not a clone because that technology did not exist when I was born. Simple, right? A better question you could have asked is, "How do you know WHO your grandpa was?" That would have been a better question...you could have said, "well, how do you know your grandma didn't have an affair and lied to everyone?"
The funny thing about this kind of logic is that we can throw it right back at ya. "How do you know jesus was real? How do you know people didn't just make it up? How do you know jesus wasn't an alien clone? etc. etc. etc.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#59
shep said:
you don't know me man, so you don't know what i studied, so i'ma lay it out for you. i'm a religious studies minor (and a history major), so i probably know more than you do.
Did I ever said I knew you? All I said and i QUOTE was "But how is what Migg said any different than what shep said?" You both said the exact same thing. I don't care if you study religion that's good for you. I do also. Not just Christianity. My point stands, why make fun of Migg (2-0 not you) and say "When your finished with all of that, study psychology and tell me why people are so stupid that they would make comments like yours." Is your comment not the same as his?
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#60
Sixxness said:
I knew you meant me....

So if you agree with what he said, why did you ask me to prove it? You want the proof? I AM. Me. Sittin right here. I am proof that my great great whatever existed. Bringing up that clone shit is fucking ridiculous bro, so don't even try to pull those cards anymore, COME UP WITH SOMETHING CONCRETE. Not your little "what ifs" and shit.
Good I was talking to you not 2-0. 'Sixx' is just shared by both of you. Where's the proof? I see no proof. Is your proof is your word? Did you research you had a grandfather? How do you know people didn't lie to you? How do you know you aren't a clone. These 'what ifs' are applied to science and religion on a daily basis. Asking questions is the only way we find answers. if you cant prove to me you have a grandfather how am i supposed to believe science can prove something we cant even see?