THE OFFICIAL OAKLAND RAIDERS 2009 OFFSEASON THREAD

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
our offense all of sudden looks threatening.
3 headed monster in the backfield with McFadden, Bush, and Fargas

young WR's like Higgins and Schzilens, plus experience at WR with Walker and Boldin...

strengthened O-Line (already stronger with Barnes instead of Harris) and we could get more linemen in the draft...

all this with JR's arm

may not be too bad looking....
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
restructuring contracts isnt an issue. as long as you get the money.

money isnt an issue with the raiders. how much of this restructure contract money is back-doored so to speak? more than we think. thats why lawyers make the big bucks.
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
3 headed monster in the backfield with McFadden, Bush, and Fargas

young WR's like Higgins and Schzilens, plus experience at WR with Walker and Boldin...

strengthened O-Line (already stronger with Barnes instead of Harris) and we could get more linemen in the draft...

all this with JR's arm

may not be too bad looking....
bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,861
113
39
money isnt an issue with the raiders. how much of this restructure contract money is back-doored so to speak? more than we think. thats why lawyers make the big bucks.
Most of the significant contracts have already been reworked.... Alot of restructured (money pushed back) becomes guaranteed as well, so really, there isnt much savings, if javon is still cut after this year, its still a huge cap hit, along with the other big signings
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
i hear you.

Most of the significant contracts have already been reworked.... Alot of restructured (money pushed back) becomes guaranteed as well, so really, there isnt much savings, if javon is still cut after this year, its still a huge cap hit, along with the other big signings
money has never been a problem with the raiders. they do what they have to on paper to make it work. restructured or not, 5 million is 5 million whether it comes in the form of a contract or a birthday gift. Al is gangsta with it.
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,861
113
39
money has never been a problem with the raiders. they do what they have to on paper to make it work. restructured or not, 5 million is 5 million whether it comes in the form of a contract or a birthday gift. Al is gangsta with it.
But also rememeber, every contract signed is subject to league and union approval....
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
no.

because i think matt jones is garbage....:confused::confused::confused::confused:

ok there buddy :ermm:....and you were a titans fan before bucs/raiders....
i've always been a raider/a's/warriors fan. you were a raider fan at one time that decided on the titans when they played the rams in the superbowl. how else does a kid in california wake up and decide "i'm going to be a titans fan." i can understand people liking an actual franchise with some history like the cowboys, steelers, raiders, 49ers, etc. but the titans. c'mon man. i know, you wanted to be different.