The Last of the Siccness Christians

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 28, 2006
295
0
0
37
STOCKTON said:
For real?!.
ok, your right, i was exagerating my point but what i said is part of jesus's purpose for being. do you not agree?

STOCKTON said:
Actually it was to see if Jesus would give into the temptations of Satan. Our Spirit and Flesh battle everyday, whether one wins or not, that's no the reason for his temptation.
yeah, but was it not amplified by the flesh? he showed that through obidience of god it was possible to walk in spirit. god knew jesus was capable of resisting, but there had to be a test to prove it to non-believers, who had succumb to flesh desire. if he did not past the test he would have been seen as a hypocrite to the apostles.

STOCKTON said:
If you're a Christian, you know God is Omni-Present .
and believe it one 110%. thru the holy spirit he is able to walk with me in part. only when i am sin free and dead in body can i fully unite with him in spirit.
 
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
36
jon21 said:
ok, your right, i was exagerating my point but what i said is part of jesus's purpose for being. do you not agree?
I agree Magee
yeah, but was it not amplified by the flesh? he showed that through obidience of god it was possible to walk in spirit.
ok :)
god knew jesus was capable of resisting, but there had to be a test to prove it to non-believers, who had succumb to flesh desire.
I agree to some extent
and believe it one 110%. thru the holy spirit he is able to walk with me in part. only when i am sin free and dead in body can i fully unite with him in spirit.
Yeah, Ok, but I don't understand you being Sin free, and united with God in what way? Our spirits being one, or Always near his side?
 
Aug 28, 2006
295
0
0
37
STOCKTON said:
Yeah, Ok, but I don't understand you being Sin free, and united with God in what way? Our spirits being one, or Always near his side?
ok, was jesus sin free? yes. so he is gods first son. only when i am sin free like jesus, because im suppose to follow jesus, can i be with god eternaly. where did jesus go? to the heavens with god. now if i follow in jesus's path then wouldnt that lead me to the lord? am i not in the path of the spirit. when i can finally walk in full spirit then i can be a part of god in his full glory.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
STOCTON,
I HAVE TOLD YOU NUMEROUS TIMES TO QUIT ASSOCIATIN' ME WITH THE JW'S. AND I HAVE TOLD YOU I BANg H'S AND YOU STILL WANNA LABEL ME. SO SINCE YOU WANNA ACT IgNORANT AND IgNORE THE FACTS ALL CAUSE I MADE A COMMENT ABOUT THE FAKE DOCTRINES YOU FOLLOW(AND NOTICE THAT I DIDN'T LABEL THEM LIKE YOU DO MINES), THEN I SHALL PULL YOUR CARD FROM HEAR ON OUT. DON'T BOTHER PM'N ME EITHA YOU FAKE INTERNET CHRISTIAN.

BTW, gENESIS 3:22 IS (gOD) TALKIN' TO HIS FIRST CREATION, WHICH BY EVERYTHANg ELSE WAS CREATED. THAT DON'T PROVE YOUR FALSE DOCTRINE.


HERESY,
I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU WANNA STIK YOUR CHEST OUT PLAYA. WE'VE BEEN OVER THIS 51 TIMES AND IT ALL ENDS UP WITH YOU TRYIN' TO TRASH CHUK T RUSS AND THE JW INSTEAD OF LOOKIN' AT THE TOPIC AT HAND AND REFUTIN' THE INFO. ALL I ASK IS TO REALLY ASK YOURSELF WHY THE CORNERSTONE OF YOUR BELIEF AIN'T MENTIONED IN SCRIPTURE BY NAME. AND WHY DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE IN A DOCTRINE THAT IS BORROWED FROM PAgAN RELIgIONS.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU WANNA STIK YOUR CHEST OUT PLAYA.
Is that what you call it?

WE'VE BEEN OVER THIS 51 TIMES AND IT ALL ENDS UP WITH YOU TRYIN' TO TRASH CHUK T RUSS AND THE JW INSTEAD OF LOOKIN' AT THE TOPIC AT HAND AND REFUTIN' THE INFO.
Not true.

ALL I ASK IS TO REALLY ASK YOURSELF WHY THE CORNERSTONE OF YOUR BELIEF AIN'T MENTIONED IN SCRIPTURE BY NAME.
I ask you the same thing.

AND WHY DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE IN A DOCTRINE THAT IS BORROWED FROM PAgAN RELIgIONS.
I don't, it isn't borrowed from pagans.
 
Jun 15, 2005
4,591
14
0
I also believe in the Trinity, and I know that there are other denominations/non-denominations of Christianity that do not believe in it.

If there is already a thread where you guys have presented info from both "sides", if you will, then direct me to it. Even though there is more than likely no amount of poignant info tht would change my mind on it, I'd still like to know where peoples are coming from.

If not, then I guess I'll just research it myself whenever I have time, which is usually never.
 
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
44
jon21 said:
it makes perfect sense. if god is all knowing, then he would have known man would fall from grace. thus he knew jesus was essential to the continuation of the human race. if then you ask since he is all knowing and perfect, why is there so much chaos in the world. did he himself planted there to begin with? no, he only created what was good. but he also created a neutral world, susceptable to both good and evil, truth and deceipt. so all he can do is guide us. he loved us so much that he gave us a choice to be with him or not. the prove of that love is we are here, with a conscience mind. able to make choices unlike animals.
Pardon my blasphemy, but JESUS CHRIST JON! You've just typed 9 lines of gibberish that has nothing to do with my statement. I said that if Jesus birth was required for creation, then how did creation occur before Jesus was born (which is a fact - the universe wasn't created at the exact moment Jesus was born, creation occured BEFORE Jesus was born). Creation and 'the continuation of the human race' are completely different things. Now try again - if the birth of Jesus was required for creation, then how did anything exist prior to his birth?

jon21 said:
if your biased. everything that comes forth from you is biased. that is your nature. so then what is your biased based on? well you said you would lie to get yourway. so your bias is all based on yourself. tell me is this a respectable character? if you are only worried about yourself, how can someone take your ideas seriously? how do you expect people to trust you? if you are only worried about yourself. how can you grow? if your not growin your dying. well you dont need anyone your an individual right? but we as humans are not meant to be alone. we need attention. if you have no respectable reputation why would anyone take what you say serious? how are your ideas crediable. and then why would i want to be a friend of yours? your idea creates division.
My bias is based on evidence. My example of lying to get an attractive woman to sleep with me is a direct analogy of your so-called evidence (which is actually a lack of evidence) regarding religion, i.e. deceiving yourself in order to maintain a strong position on a topic which isn't true. I am not 'only worried about myself', I am not that selfish. I usually appreciate others happiness above and beyond my own. Even if I did only care about myself, why do you think this means my ideas shouldn't be taken seriously? Am I forwarding an argument which will in any way benefit me personally? No. I am using my brain and assessing the available evidence.

That was a rather weak, airy-fairy attack on my character jon. You make a false assumption that I only care about myself, and then lead yourself to the false conclusion that no-one can take my ideas seriously, no-one can trust me, that I'm not a respectable character and that no-one would want to be a friend of mine. Oh, I think I'll cry right about now.

jon21 said:
well you dont need anyone your an individual right? but we as humans are not meant to be alone. we need attention.
Another false assumption. I love my family, my girlfriend and my friends. Business associates are valuable allies to have as they can further my career. Sales assistants are essential because without them I could not purchase necessary items. I also appreciate and need farmers for without them I would starve. You get the picture. Why would you blurt out such a stupid phrase as 'you don't need anyone you're an individual' knowing full well that is not true for ANYONE. I don't need your God in order to get attention. Without your God I am still not alone.

jon21 said:
"Devide and conquer" "order thru chaos" think about that.
Do you mean, like the formation of several conflicting, mutually incompatible religions, each of which feel justified for believing that theirs is the truth? That's definitely division and chaos, you're right!
 
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
44
STOCKTON said:
So Hutch, if you believe a theory, something that hasn't been proven are you using Logic? I agree that religion at times cannot be proven with HUMAN LOGIC, but does a women bleeding for ten years with no apparent sickness then is healed Logic? Does a man shot in the head 3 TIMES and survive even hitting his brain Logic? Can a prophecy in the Bible that comes true, be explained Logically?
Yes, I am using logic. Evolution is a theory but has not been definitively proven. There is ample evidence supporting evolution though - the fossil record (oh, it's incomplete - disregard it all!), real-time observation of micro-evolution (and even some cases of macro-evolution - if you recall my previous post regarding moths in industrial England). If one applies logic and reason, combined with this evidence, they can easily see how evolution could have occured. That is using logic.

Religion can NEVER be proven with human logic - in fact, religion can never be proven full stop. If a woman stopped bleeding after ten years based on something that a religious practitioner did, then I would say it was either (a) a coincidence, or (b) some use of a medical application by the religious practitioner in order to deceive their subjects. That is using logic.

Several parts of the brain are either (a) not required for life (your speech centre is not required for physiological functioning), or (b) other parts of the brain can be used to perform the same tasks (evolutionary degeneracy). Most people who are shot in the head three times die, but not all of them do and that in NO WAY has anything to do with your God. That is using logic.

If a prophecy in the bible comes true, it is either because (a) there are so many prophecies that based on probability, some are bound to come true, (b) many of the prophecies are similar to Nostradamus' in the sense that they are so vague that people can interpret them differently, and (c) Christianity is so strong right now that those people currently practicing may deliberately perform acts which make a prophecy true, thus lending false support of the 'Good book'. That is using logic.
 
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
44
HERESY said:
I believe in the Trinity, and I bet my site membership that NEITHER YOU NOR HUTCH would tear me a new one in regards to this matter. Now, as far as what the bible does and doesn't speak on their are many things. It doesn't speak on Jesus being Michael (which YOU believe), and it doesn't mention 144,000 J.W.'s going to heaven...:dead:
Who said anything about tearing a new one? I want to know exactly what trinitarianism is according to the people on these boards. You seem like a relatively logical, reasonable person Heresy so maybe I should ask you instead of Stockton.

Would you be so kind to explain to me, in your own words, what the Trinity actually is? Is it three 'Gods', or is it three different manifestations of the one God? Analogies would be useful, but the egg one didn't do the argument any justice last time.
 
Aug 28, 2006
295
0
0
37
Hutch said:
Pardon my blasphemy, but JESUS CHRIST JON! You've just typed 9 lines of gibberish that has nothing to do with my statement. I said that if Jesus birth was required for creation, then how did creation occur before Jesus was born (which is a fact - the universe wasn't created at the exact moment Jesus was born, creation occured BEFORE Jesus was born). Creation and 'the continuation of the human race' are completely different things. Now try again - if the birth of Jesus was required for creation, then how did anything exist prior to his birth?
where did you read that jesus's birth was necessary for the creation of the physical universe?



Hutch said:
My bias is based on evidence. My example of lying to get an attractive woman to sleep with me is a direct analogy of your so-called evidence (which is actually a lack of evidence) regarding religion, i.e. deceiving yourself in order to maintain a strong position on a topic which isn't true. I am not 'only worried about myself', I am not that selfish. I usually appreciate others happiness above and beyond my own. Even if I did only care about myself, why do you think this means my ideas shouldn't be taken seriously? Am I forwarding an argument which will in any way benefit me personally? No. I am using my brain and assessing the available evidence.
i wasnt making an attack on your charcater. i was just pointing out that, you cant trust someone completely, if they dont have a correct believe system. its like an engine thats out of sync and vibrates until it brakes itself. what i mean by that is that if your values are all based on yourself then, sooner or later they will manifest physically and end up braking you, eventually. the time it will take to brake you depends on how correct your believe system is.

what i am saying is, your evolutionist believe system will eventually break.
because it is a believe system that has no purpose other than to explain to us that we are no better than an animals and that we have no purpose. if i have no purpose then i must create my own. but if i can be controlled and manipulated by society, whats stopping society from corrupting us?

you can already see it begin to happen. the popular media already has and is gaining more grip on weak minded people. people that can be manipulated with money, people that are uneducated. why is our educational system failing? why does poverty still exist in the riches country in the world? its clear to me what is happening in the world as it must be clear to you.

the difference between weak minds and strong minds is all based on emotinal expiriences and education. good emotional epiriences and education both have to be present if you want to hav e a productive well thinking citizen. who controls the educational system? who controls the media? who controls the money?.

its obvious to see that americans have been put in a rat race that they sure as hell are gonna lose. controlled by a corrupt government that is in turn controlled by atheist. now im not making an attack on atheism, but, i guarantee that those in power dont give a shit about the population. they care about themselves more than others. and this all goes back to their believe system and character. they have figured out a way to live like kings and control the population. they have used our most powerfull tool against us,
our brain. with what though? capitalism.



Hutch said:
That was a rather weak, airy-fairy attack on my character jon. You make a false assumption that I only care about myself, and then lead yourself to the false conclusion that no-one can take my ideas seriously, no-one can trust me, that I'm not a respectable character and that no-one would want to be a friend of mine. Oh, I think I'll cry right about now.
i respect your ideas. obviously you are well educated. i dont agree with all your ideas but i still respect them.



Hutch said:
Another false assumption. I love my family, my girlfriend and my friends. Business associates are valuable allies to have as they can further my career. Sales assistants are essential because without them I could not purchase necessary items. I also appreciate and need farmers for without them I would starve. You get the picture. Why would you blurt out such a stupid phrase as 'you don't need anyone you're an individual' knowing full well that is not true for ANYONE. I don't need your God in order to get attention. Without your God I am still not alone.
its true. you dont really need anyone physcially. if you where a farmer with your own land you could obviously live of the land by yourself. but what you probably couldnt do is live by yourself emotionaly. you would get lonely and probably depressed.



Hutch said:
Do you mean, like the formation of several conflicting, mutually incompatible religions, each of which feel justified for believing that theirs is the truth? That's definitely division and chaos, you're right!
lol...your only looking at this from one side of the coin. examine your side and you will see the flaws.