Peep this article out:
http://scienceandthebible.org/index.cfm?page=mathematics
Check this:
http://afgen.com/revealed.html
http://scienceandthebible.org/index.cfm?page=mathematics
Check this:
http://afgen.com/revealed.html
THE FAKEST RELIgION
- Thread starter EDJ
- Start date
i dont know about the fakest or the most missleading but i could do without those pieces of shit jehovas witnesses knocking at my door every fucking weekend, with their shiny suits, and theyre 40,000 rides sitting in the fucking streets trying to peddle their little booklets and theyre little books...and theyre little runt kids walking alongside them trying to tell me what the fuck to believe in...god should get rid of these ppl...theyre the most annoying most intrusive most dont know when to fucking quit organization ive run into...and these bastards act like theyr shit dont stink...getting mad at me when i slam the door in theyre fucking face...annoying pricks.
I just read the articles.
One of them actually picks the KJV over all because even though it has translation errors (like any other version) it's the closest to the real deal.
Now the only major difference between this and the Catholic bible is the Apocrypha.
The only non-God inspired scripture that's worth debating about no matter what EDJ thinks.
The Apocrypha is very controversial because Catholics claim that even though it wasn't used by the early church, it was once used by Jesus's apostles because the Apocrypha was later found in Greek versions of the bible.
This requires a lot of studying before one can make a decision as whether it's legit or not.
Protestants and Jews think it isn't God inspired because it was discovered rather late. And the fact that it's only found in Greek translations doesn't help....
One of them actually picks the KJV over all because even though it has translation errors (like any other version) it's the closest to the real deal.
Now the only major difference between this and the Catholic bible is the Apocrypha.
The only non-God inspired scripture that's worth debating about no matter what EDJ thinks.
The Apocrypha is very controversial because Catholics claim that even though it wasn't used by the early church, it was once used by Jesus's apostles because the Apocrypha was later found in Greek versions of the bible.
This requires a lot of studying before one can make a decision as whether it's legit or not.
Protestants and Jews think it isn't God inspired because it was discovered rather late. And the fact that it's only found in Greek translations doesn't help....
Pretty much but before you say anything remember that Jesus said, “Seek and you will find”. He said that the Spirit will reveal the truth.
They discredit the concept which basically goes against what the Old and New Testiment teaches.
I get what I have told you thus far. And that is very different than what the JW’s teach.
Ok so you do believe that the second coming of Christ is yet to come right?
Ok humor me on this difference you’re talking about.
Because to me, it’s the same hell.
Hell in Hebrew? “Gehenna” right?
Which was a place of torment but not necessarily eternal.
This is interesting because I remember when I started reading the bible and argued with my Protestant friend for days that Hell may in most cases eternal for some, but not eternal for all. I got this idea from what Jesus said about debtors and people who are locked up.
It’s somewhere in Matthew and basically Jesus compared Hell with jail.
He said that those who are locked up because they owe money won’t come out until they pay the very last cent. And he compared these with those who go to hell.
Interesting eh?
Yes but that has nothing to do with the fact that they’re trying to earn that ticket.
I understand that but there’s a fine line between tryin to help others and those who help others in order to help themselves ya know?
Gotta be careful with that….
I understand that.
Ok?
LOL! Power Rangers?
How about Neon Genesis Evangelion?
I see the light, but I’m not at the end of the tunnel yet.
Think about that for a second. Why would Jesus talk about “other” sheep to the great crowd? When he said the other sheep, he was talking about the after life of what you call the great crowd. It seems to me that Jesus wasn’t talking about the anointed ones but someone else who will join this great crowd.
Everyone with a good heart will.
Remember what Jesus said to the thief who was nailed next to him on the cross?
So is this why you don’t believe in an evil entity such as Satan? I’m assuming you don’t believe in this Satan….
Nobody, it's just something I saw a while back as I was browsing the web.
I can dig that up if you like to see it.
Continued....
They discredit the concept which basically goes against what the Old and New Testiment teaches.
I get what I have told you thus far. And that is very different than what the JW’s teach.
Ok so you do believe that the second coming of Christ is yet to come right?
Ok humor me on this difference you’re talking about.
Because to me, it’s the same hell.
Hell in Hebrew? “Gehenna” right?
Which was a place of torment but not necessarily eternal.
This is interesting because I remember when I started reading the bible and argued with my Protestant friend for days that Hell may in most cases eternal for some, but not eternal for all. I got this idea from what Jesus said about debtors and people who are locked up.
It’s somewhere in Matthew and basically Jesus compared Hell with jail.
He said that those who are locked up because they owe money won’t come out until they pay the very last cent. And he compared these with those who go to hell.
Interesting eh?
Yes but that has nothing to do with the fact that they’re trying to earn that ticket.
I understand that but there’s a fine line between tryin to help others and those who help others in order to help themselves ya know?
Gotta be careful with that….
I understand that.
Ok?
LOL! Power Rangers?
How about Neon Genesis Evangelion?
I see the light, but I’m not at the end of the tunnel yet.
Think about that for a second. Why would Jesus talk about “other” sheep to the great crowd? When he said the other sheep, he was talking about the after life of what you call the great crowd. It seems to me that Jesus wasn’t talking about the anointed ones but someone else who will join this great crowd.
Everyone with a good heart will.
Remember what Jesus said to the thief who was nailed next to him on the cross?
So is this why you don’t believe in an evil entity such as Satan? I’m assuming you don’t believe in this Satan….
Nobody, it's just something I saw a while back as I was browsing the web.
I can dig that up if you like to see it.
Continued....
Very well then but I have yet to see any of that. Nothing even close to that.
It doesn’t verbally and audibly talk to you.
So it’s hard to tell but it comes in as thoughts.
It has nothing to do with assumption.
I’m sure it happens to everyone, it’s just that most don’t pay attention to it.
Give it a try. Put it to test.
Maybe…. But let me ask you this, have you ever disagreed with yourself?
I’m not talking about your conscious disagreeing with you, meaning your conscious tells you “don’t do that, it’s wrong”, or “Do it, who cares?”.
I’m talking about something deeper than the conscious.
Ugh! It’s hard to explain but try to pay more attention to your mind and you’ll see what I’m talking about.
I’m sure Heresy could explain this to you better.
You bet, if I was the boss man LOL!
In the words of Quinton “Rampage” Jackson, “I’ma do my thang! I’ma do my thang! And when I do my thang, my thang gonna be done!”
KJV
Ok, I’m gonna look into that.
Then how are you gonna find the truth then?
Isn’t it true that if you ask God, he can guide you towards the right path since man has hid it?
Read Revelation 8: 1-6
Haven’t switched, I still believe in what I see and what the Spirit reveals to me.
What do you say about those who aren’t part of the great crowd and the anointed ones?
What is their fate?
Why should the burden of proof be on me if we are talking about biblical kindergarten?
I can agree with that….
What has been revealed to me with the help of the Spirit. Not what I hear from another man’s mouth.
How can you miss the many times where he talks about the wicked?
You’re the one talking about cross referencing, researching this and that.
Yet you cannot add 1+2+3….
It doesn’t verbally and audibly talk to you.
So it’s hard to tell but it comes in as thoughts.
It has nothing to do with assumption.
I’m sure it happens to everyone, it’s just that most don’t pay attention to it.
Give it a try. Put it to test.
Maybe…. But let me ask you this, have you ever disagreed with yourself?
I’m not talking about your conscious disagreeing with you, meaning your conscious tells you “don’t do that, it’s wrong”, or “Do it, who cares?”.
I’m talking about something deeper than the conscious.
Ugh! It’s hard to explain but try to pay more attention to your mind and you’ll see what I’m talking about.
I’m sure Heresy could explain this to you better.
You bet, if I was the boss man LOL!
In the words of Quinton “Rampage” Jackson, “I’ma do my thang! I’ma do my thang! And when I do my thang, my thang gonna be done!”
KJV
Ok, I’m gonna look into that.
Then how are you gonna find the truth then?
Isn’t it true that if you ask God, he can guide you towards the right path since man has hid it?
Read Revelation 8: 1-6
Haven’t switched, I still believe in what I see and what the Spirit reveals to me.
What do you say about those who aren’t part of the great crowd and the anointed ones?
What is their fate?
Why should the burden of proof be on me if we are talking about biblical kindergarten?
I can agree with that….
What has been revealed to me with the help of the Spirit. Not what I hear from another man’s mouth.
How can you miss the many times where he talks about the wicked?
You’re the one talking about cross referencing, researching this and that.
Yet you cannot add 1+2+3….
Re: Re: Re: THE FAKEST RELIgION
i'm just stating my opinion and my beliefs, so calm the fuck down.....you took WAY too much time to reply to my one post dogg.....i answered the fuckin question with MY OPINION....if you dont' like it, tough fuckin luck......but I think that Christianity is a FAKE ass religion with a bunch of fuckin ignorant ass people.....at least, 80% of the christians i've met are like that......not to say that all are like that......
i'm just stating my opinion and my beliefs, so calm the fuck down.....you took WAY too much time to reply to my one post dogg.....i answered the fuckin question with MY OPINION....if you dont' like it, tough fuckin luck......but I think that Christianity is a FAKE ass religion with a bunch of fuckin ignorant ass people.....at least, 80% of the christians i've met are like that......not to say that all are like that......
HELL NO IM NOT BACK!!!!!!!!
I have been reading this thread since the start. NOW, I will post a response. This is the ONLY response, I am capable of giving. PAY ATTENTION:
@EDJ YOU AND I ALREADY WENT OVER THIS AND I DESTROYED YOUR J.W. DOCTRINE/DOGMA ALREADY. IT'S USELESS TO BRING UP THE SAME ARGUMENTS BECAUSE THEY ARE FLAWED. YOU ARE PUTTING EMPHASIS ON WHICH SCRIPTURES ARE ACCURATE/NOT ACCURATE BUT THE BOOK YOU ADHERE TO WAS WRITTEN BY PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T KNOW *ANY* HEBREW, GREEK, LATIN OR ARAMAIC. THAT'S LIKE A PERSON WRITING A BOOK ON NEVE CONSOLES WHEN THEY HAVE *NEVER* RECORDED A SONG, BEEN TO A STUDIO OR HEARD MUSIC RECORDED ON A NEVE. YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY TAKE PEOPLE LIKE THAT SERIOUSLY.
CONCERNING HELL AND ITS CORRECT MEANING YOU ARE INCORRECT IN SEVERAL AREAS. IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YOU HAVE NO REASON FOR A MESSIAH/SAVIOUR. EVEN THE JEWS BELIEVE IN A LITERAL HELL BUT IT'S A TAD DIFFERENT FROM THE "CHRISTIAN" VERSION. 1 YEAR VS ETERNITY. PURGING VS TORMENT.
IF HELL IS THE GRAVE THAT MEANS ANGELS CAN DIE...LOL! 2 Peter 2:4
THE CORRECT TERM FOR GRAVE IS QUBER OR QIBRAH.
IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YESHUA/JESUS WAS THE GREATEST LUNATIC AND LIAR TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH. AN EXAMPLE (WHICH YOU HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER) IS FOUND IN MATT 13:24-43. IN VERSE 24-30 YOU HAVE YESHUA/JESUS GIVING A PARABLE ABOUT WHEAT AND TARES. IN VERSE 36 THE *DISCIPLES* ASK FOR HIM TO EXPLAIN THE PARABLES OF TARES. FROM 37 ON AN EXPLANATION IS GIVEN. NOW ASK YOURSELF TWO QUESTIONS:
1.IF HELL IS NOT REAL/LITERAL WHY DID YESHUA/JESUS MENTION A PLACE OF TORMENT, FIRE, WEEPING AND GNASHING IN HIS *EXPLANATION*?
2.IF HIS EXPLANATION WAS NOT LITERAL THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE DID *NOT* EXPLAIN THE PARABLE TO THE DISCIPLES BUT GAVE THEM ANOTHER PARABLE. WHAT WOULD BE THE USE OF EXPLAINING A PARABLE WITH A PARABLE?
I GUARANTEE THAT EDJ WILL:
A. AVOID THESE QUESTIONS
OR
B.SAY HE WILL LOOK INTO THEM BUT NEVER ADDRESS THEM (ALMOST THE SAME AS A.)
YESHUA/JESUS GAVE MORE SERMONS ABOUT HELL THAN HEAVEN. THAT'S A FACT.
YESHUA BEING "CREATED" IS ONE OF THE MOST RETARDED DOGMAS/DOCTRINES A PERSON CAN ACCEPT. "FIRST BORN" AND "ONLY BEGOTTEN" ARE TITLES AND IN THE CASE OF YESHUA/JESUS (AND OTHERS) DO NOT REFER TO CHRONOLOGY.
IF YESHUA WAS MICHAEL (MICHA'EL) THE ARCH ANGEL THAT WOULD MAKE HIM A RATHER LOW RANKING ANGEL. NO SCRIPTURE EXISTS THAT STATES MICHAEL AND JESUS ARE THE SAME. NO IDEA OR HINT AT THAT IS EVEN GIVEN IN THE BIBLE. I COULD SEE IF A PERSON SAID JESUS WAS A SON OF FIRE (SERAPHIM WHO STAND NEAR THE THRONE OF HA-SHEM) BUT THE J.W. HAVE REDUCED HIM TO AN ARCH ANGEL. ARCH ANGELS ARE RANKED NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE ANGELIC LIST.
NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS WHATSOEVER.
144,000 ARE FROM THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL WHO ARE SEALED. REV 7:1-8
THEY ARE VIRGINS (WITH EMPHASIS PLACED ON THEM NOT BEING DEFILED WITH WOMEN) REV 14:1-5
THAT WOULD ELIMINATE EACH AND EVERY J.W. THAT IS:
A. FEMALE
B.NON HEBREW
C.NON VIRGIN
I WON'T GET INTO THE CRAZY/WACKY PREDICTIONS THAT THE J.W.'S HAVE MADE. NOR WILL I ELABORATE ON THE *FACT* THAT THE J.W.'S HAVE RECEIVED MONEY/FUNDING FROM ONE OF THE LEADING GLOBALIST/ILLUMINIST FAMILIES TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH. THE J.W. DOCTRINE IS ONE OF THE WACKIEST DOCTRINES WITH THOSE CRAZY COMIC BOOKS. WHY DO THEY HAVE COMIC BOOKS WITH JESUS ON A TREE, A LAMB, BLUE EYES AND A SHORT PERM? THEY SIT IN FRONT OF RALEYS AND SAFEWAY ALL DAY HOLDING THOSE DAMN COMIC BOOKS AS IF THEY WERE SOME WAY TO SALVATION. SPEAKING OF TREES THEY MISCONSTRUE A BIBLE VERSE AND MAKE IT SEEM AS IF YESHUA WAS HUNG ON A TREE. IF ONLY THEY LOOKED UP THE GREEK WORDS...SAD I TELL YOU.
DON'T BOTHER REPLYING EDJ BECAUSE YOU WILL DANCE AROUND THE QUESTIONS POSED TO YOU (LIKE YOU DID NUMEROUS TIMES BEFORE)
LEARN THE SHEMA AND SPEND YOUR TIME DOING OTHER PRODUCTIVE THINGS. FOLLOWING THAT CRAZY COMIC BOOK DOGMA IS NOT WORTH IT. I DO ADMIT THAT I PRAISE THE J.W.'S FOR NOT FOLLOWING PAGAN CHRISTIAN/CATHOLIC TRADITIONS LIKE HALLOWEEN, EASTER OR CHRISTMAS. IF YOU WERE NOT A FOLLOWER OF THE DOCTRINE YOU WOULD NOT UPHOLD THE VIEWS THEY HAVE. YOU HAVE DEFENDED THEM IN MANY THREADS/POSTS.
EDJ I'VE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT SCRIPTURES/DOCTRINES/DOGMAS ARE NOT TOPICS THAT YOU ARE WELL VERSED IN. IM NOT SAYING THAT TO BELITTLE YOU BUT IM SAYING THIS SO YOU WILL LEAVE THOSE TOPICS ALONE.
NOW TO ANSWER THE ORIGINAL QUESTION THE FAKEST RELIGION WOULD HAVE TO BE CATHOLICISM OR THE THE 501(C) 3 CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
THE MOST SAV RELIGION IS NOT ISLAM BUT CATHOLICISM. FROM SUPPORTING ORGANIZED CRIME, TO CONTROLLING WARS, TO MOLESTATION, TO TERRORISM, TO GLOBALISM THE CATHOLIC POWERS (JESUITS AND HIGH RANKING ORDERS) HAVE DONE IT ALL.
THE LAMEST RELIGION IS THE J.W. OR MORMON CULTS. ONE GUY SPOKE TO FROGS WHILE THE OTHER GUY PREDICTED THE END OF THE WORLD OVER 10 TIMES (I'M STILL HERE)
THE NATION OF ISLAM IS LAME ALSO. ALL THAT MONEY RECEIVED FROM THE REV.MOON AND GLOBALYST LEADERS...YET "FARACOON" IS PREACHING BLACK PRIDE AND ALLAH. HIS VERSION OF ISLAM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REAL ISLAM.
THE WEAKEST RELIGION IS SATANISM. MOST SATANIST KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE BAPHOMET SIGN, BAAL OR THE FALLEN RANKS. THEY TEND TO NOT BELIEVE IN A "LITERAL" DEVIL BUT THE "IDEA" OF HEDONISM AND SELF GRATIFICATION/PLEASURE. BASICALLY ITS THE "IF IT FEELS GOOD DO IT" DOCTRINE.
ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL RELIGIONS (AS FAR AS WHAT YOU CAN DO) IS BLACK MAGIK (SPELLED MAGICK OR MAGIK). I WOULDN'T ADVISE DOING IT AS YOU WILL HAVE YOUR SOUL SWALLOWED. VOODOO WOULD RANK AMONGST THE TOP ALSO.
WHAT'S THE *TRUE* RELIGION?
GIVING TO THE POOR, HELPING THE WIDOWS AND TAKING CARE OF ORPHANS.
NOW SOME WOULD SAY I FOLLOW A "CHRISTIAN" DOGMA/DOCTRINE BUT THAT ISN'T THE CASE. I WILL DEFEND MYSELF IF I NEED TO, I WILL MOUNT ATTACKS IF I NEED TO, I WILL TAKE UP ARMS AGAINST MY ENEMIES WHEN I NEED TO. I WILL NOT TURN THE OTHER CHEEK AS THE RULES HAVE CHANGED. YEAH I BELIEVE IN GOD BUT I ALSO BELIEVE IN SMACKING THE PISS OUT OF SOME PEOPLE. IS THAT VIOLENT? WELL THOSE ARE THE RULES WE PLAY BY...
BTW ITS OFFICIAL. AMERICA EARNED THE TITLE "MYSTERY BABYLON" WHEN THEY INVADED IRAQ. ENJOY THE REST OF YOUR FREEDOM AS GLOBALISM HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED. YOUR "ANTICHRIST" IS HERE.
HERESY THE GOD KhILLERr
I have been reading this thread since the start. NOW, I will post a response. This is the ONLY response, I am capable of giving. PAY ATTENTION:
@EDJ YOU AND I ALREADY WENT OVER THIS AND I DESTROYED YOUR J.W. DOCTRINE/DOGMA ALREADY. IT'S USELESS TO BRING UP THE SAME ARGUMENTS BECAUSE THEY ARE FLAWED. YOU ARE PUTTING EMPHASIS ON WHICH SCRIPTURES ARE ACCURATE/NOT ACCURATE BUT THE BOOK YOU ADHERE TO WAS WRITTEN BY PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T KNOW *ANY* HEBREW, GREEK, LATIN OR ARAMAIC. THAT'S LIKE A PERSON WRITING A BOOK ON NEVE CONSOLES WHEN THEY HAVE *NEVER* RECORDED A SONG, BEEN TO A STUDIO OR HEARD MUSIC RECORDED ON A NEVE. YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY TAKE PEOPLE LIKE THAT SERIOUSLY.
CONCERNING HELL AND ITS CORRECT MEANING YOU ARE INCORRECT IN SEVERAL AREAS. IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YOU HAVE NO REASON FOR A MESSIAH/SAVIOUR. EVEN THE JEWS BELIEVE IN A LITERAL HELL BUT IT'S A TAD DIFFERENT FROM THE "CHRISTIAN" VERSION. 1 YEAR VS ETERNITY. PURGING VS TORMENT.
IF HELL IS THE GRAVE THAT MEANS ANGELS CAN DIE...LOL! 2 Peter 2:4
THE CORRECT TERM FOR GRAVE IS QUBER OR QIBRAH.
IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YESHUA/JESUS WAS THE GREATEST LUNATIC AND LIAR TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH. AN EXAMPLE (WHICH YOU HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER) IS FOUND IN MATT 13:24-43. IN VERSE 24-30 YOU HAVE YESHUA/JESUS GIVING A PARABLE ABOUT WHEAT AND TARES. IN VERSE 36 THE *DISCIPLES* ASK FOR HIM TO EXPLAIN THE PARABLES OF TARES. FROM 37 ON AN EXPLANATION IS GIVEN. NOW ASK YOURSELF TWO QUESTIONS:
1.IF HELL IS NOT REAL/LITERAL WHY DID YESHUA/JESUS MENTION A PLACE OF TORMENT, FIRE, WEEPING AND GNASHING IN HIS *EXPLANATION*?
2.IF HIS EXPLANATION WAS NOT LITERAL THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE DID *NOT* EXPLAIN THE PARABLE TO THE DISCIPLES BUT GAVE THEM ANOTHER PARABLE. WHAT WOULD BE THE USE OF EXPLAINING A PARABLE WITH A PARABLE?
I GUARANTEE THAT EDJ WILL:
A. AVOID THESE QUESTIONS
OR
B.SAY HE WILL LOOK INTO THEM BUT NEVER ADDRESS THEM (ALMOST THE SAME AS A.)
YESHUA/JESUS GAVE MORE SERMONS ABOUT HELL THAN HEAVEN. THAT'S A FACT.
YESHUA BEING "CREATED" IS ONE OF THE MOST RETARDED DOGMAS/DOCTRINES A PERSON CAN ACCEPT. "FIRST BORN" AND "ONLY BEGOTTEN" ARE TITLES AND IN THE CASE OF YESHUA/JESUS (AND OTHERS) DO NOT REFER TO CHRONOLOGY.
IF YESHUA WAS MICHAEL (MICHA'EL) THE ARCH ANGEL THAT WOULD MAKE HIM A RATHER LOW RANKING ANGEL. NO SCRIPTURE EXISTS THAT STATES MICHAEL AND JESUS ARE THE SAME. NO IDEA OR HINT AT THAT IS EVEN GIVEN IN THE BIBLE. I COULD SEE IF A PERSON SAID JESUS WAS A SON OF FIRE (SERAPHIM WHO STAND NEAR THE THRONE OF HA-SHEM) BUT THE J.W. HAVE REDUCED HIM TO AN ARCH ANGEL. ARCH ANGELS ARE RANKED NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE ANGELIC LIST.
NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS WHATSOEVER.
144,000 ARE FROM THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL WHO ARE SEALED. REV 7:1-8
THEY ARE VIRGINS (WITH EMPHASIS PLACED ON THEM NOT BEING DEFILED WITH WOMEN) REV 14:1-5
THAT WOULD ELIMINATE EACH AND EVERY J.W. THAT IS:
A. FEMALE
B.NON HEBREW
C.NON VIRGIN
I WON'T GET INTO THE CRAZY/WACKY PREDICTIONS THAT THE J.W.'S HAVE MADE. NOR WILL I ELABORATE ON THE *FACT* THAT THE J.W.'S HAVE RECEIVED MONEY/FUNDING FROM ONE OF THE LEADING GLOBALIST/ILLUMINIST FAMILIES TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH. THE J.W. DOCTRINE IS ONE OF THE WACKIEST DOCTRINES WITH THOSE CRAZY COMIC BOOKS. WHY DO THEY HAVE COMIC BOOKS WITH JESUS ON A TREE, A LAMB, BLUE EYES AND A SHORT PERM? THEY SIT IN FRONT OF RALEYS AND SAFEWAY ALL DAY HOLDING THOSE DAMN COMIC BOOKS AS IF THEY WERE SOME WAY TO SALVATION. SPEAKING OF TREES THEY MISCONSTRUE A BIBLE VERSE AND MAKE IT SEEM AS IF YESHUA WAS HUNG ON A TREE. IF ONLY THEY LOOKED UP THE GREEK WORDS...SAD I TELL YOU.
DON'T BOTHER REPLYING EDJ BECAUSE YOU WILL DANCE AROUND THE QUESTIONS POSED TO YOU (LIKE YOU DID NUMEROUS TIMES BEFORE)
LEARN THE SHEMA AND SPEND YOUR TIME DOING OTHER PRODUCTIVE THINGS. FOLLOWING THAT CRAZY COMIC BOOK DOGMA IS NOT WORTH IT. I DO ADMIT THAT I PRAISE THE J.W.'S FOR NOT FOLLOWING PAGAN CHRISTIAN/CATHOLIC TRADITIONS LIKE HALLOWEEN, EASTER OR CHRISTMAS. IF YOU WERE NOT A FOLLOWER OF THE DOCTRINE YOU WOULD NOT UPHOLD THE VIEWS THEY HAVE. YOU HAVE DEFENDED THEM IN MANY THREADS/POSTS.
EDJ I'VE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT SCRIPTURES/DOCTRINES/DOGMAS ARE NOT TOPICS THAT YOU ARE WELL VERSED IN. IM NOT SAYING THAT TO BELITTLE YOU BUT IM SAYING THIS SO YOU WILL LEAVE THOSE TOPICS ALONE.
NOW TO ANSWER THE ORIGINAL QUESTION THE FAKEST RELIGION WOULD HAVE TO BE CATHOLICISM OR THE THE 501(C) 3 CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
THE MOST SAV RELIGION IS NOT ISLAM BUT CATHOLICISM. FROM SUPPORTING ORGANIZED CRIME, TO CONTROLLING WARS, TO MOLESTATION, TO TERRORISM, TO GLOBALISM THE CATHOLIC POWERS (JESUITS AND HIGH RANKING ORDERS) HAVE DONE IT ALL.
THE LAMEST RELIGION IS THE J.W. OR MORMON CULTS. ONE GUY SPOKE TO FROGS WHILE THE OTHER GUY PREDICTED THE END OF THE WORLD OVER 10 TIMES (I'M STILL HERE)
THE NATION OF ISLAM IS LAME ALSO. ALL THAT MONEY RECEIVED FROM THE REV.MOON AND GLOBALYST LEADERS...YET "FARACOON" IS PREACHING BLACK PRIDE AND ALLAH. HIS VERSION OF ISLAM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REAL ISLAM.
THE WEAKEST RELIGION IS SATANISM. MOST SATANIST KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE BAPHOMET SIGN, BAAL OR THE FALLEN RANKS. THEY TEND TO NOT BELIEVE IN A "LITERAL" DEVIL BUT THE "IDEA" OF HEDONISM AND SELF GRATIFICATION/PLEASURE. BASICALLY ITS THE "IF IT FEELS GOOD DO IT" DOCTRINE.
ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL RELIGIONS (AS FAR AS WHAT YOU CAN DO) IS BLACK MAGIK (SPELLED MAGICK OR MAGIK). I WOULDN'T ADVISE DOING IT AS YOU WILL HAVE YOUR SOUL SWALLOWED. VOODOO WOULD RANK AMONGST THE TOP ALSO.
WHAT'S THE *TRUE* RELIGION?
GIVING TO THE POOR, HELPING THE WIDOWS AND TAKING CARE OF ORPHANS.
NOW SOME WOULD SAY I FOLLOW A "CHRISTIAN" DOGMA/DOCTRINE BUT THAT ISN'T THE CASE. I WILL DEFEND MYSELF IF I NEED TO, I WILL MOUNT ATTACKS IF I NEED TO, I WILL TAKE UP ARMS AGAINST MY ENEMIES WHEN I NEED TO. I WILL NOT TURN THE OTHER CHEEK AS THE RULES HAVE CHANGED. YEAH I BELIEVE IN GOD BUT I ALSO BELIEVE IN SMACKING THE PISS OUT OF SOME PEOPLE. IS THAT VIOLENT? WELL THOSE ARE THE RULES WE PLAY BY...
BTW ITS OFFICIAL. AMERICA EARNED THE TITLE "MYSTERY BABYLON" WHEN THEY INVADED IRAQ. ENJOY THE REST OF YOUR FREEDOM AS GLOBALISM HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED. YOUR "ANTICHRIST" IS HERE.
HERESY THE GOD KhILLERr
^^i'd lke to comment on when you said jesus might have been the biggest lunatic/liar......In today's society, if someone said they were a messiah, or whatever, they would be fucking commited.....it just happens to be that back then people thought WAY different and EVERYTHING was different and people viewed the world differently. I think Jesus just ate too many fuckin mushrooms and started hearing voices 
but on a serious note...Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me.
but on a serious note...Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me.
Re: Re: Re: Re: THE FAKEST RELIgION
First of all, it only took me a couple minutes to reply.
I see that it has taken you longer....
I like the way you dodged my questions. I can give a fuck what your opinion is but the reasons you gave can be said about any religion so your reasons are irrelavent to this thread.
All I got out of your post was nothing but Christian bashing we can be thrown into another thread.
First of all, it only took me a couple minutes to reply.
I see that it has taken you longer....
I like the way you dodged my questions. I can give a fuck what your opinion is but the reasons you gave can be said about any religion so your reasons are irrelavent to this thread.
All I got out of your post was nothing but Christian bashing we can be thrown into another thread.
Sixxness said:
^^i'd lke to comment on when you said jesus might have been the biggest lunatic/liar......In today's society, if someone said they were a messiah, or whatever, they would be fucking commited.....it just happens to be that back then people thought WAY different and EVERYTHING was different and people viewed the world differently. I think Jesus just ate too many fuckin mushrooms and started hearing voices but on a serious note...Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me.
but on a serious note...Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me.
LOL! Yeah and everyone else around him, his friends and those who witnessed what he did.
Yeah, it was the shrooms.... I mean he died for the shrooms, not only him but his apostles as well.
That really makes sense.
And as for Christians worshipping Jesus,
read the gospels and the book of Revelation.
Sixxness said:
^^i'd lke to comment on when you said jesus might have been the biggest lunatic/liar......In today's society, if someone said they were a messiah, or whatever, they would be fucking commited.....it just happens to be that back then people thought WAY different and EVERYTHING was different and people viewed the world differently. I think Jesus just ate too many fuckin mushrooms and started hearing voices but on a serious note...Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me.
but on a serious note...Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me.
IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YESHUA/JESUS WAS THE GREATEST LUNATIC AND LIAR TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH. AN EXAMPLE (WHICH YOU HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER) IS FOUND IN MATT 13:24-43. IN VERSE 24-30 YOU HAVE YESHUA/JESUS GIVING A PARABLE ABOUT WHEAT AND TARES. IN VERSE 36 THE *DISCIPLES* ASK FOR HIM TO EXPLAIN THE PARABLES OF TARES. FROM 37 ON AN EXPLANATION IS GIVEN.
"In today's society, if someone said they were a messiah, or whatever, they would be fucking commited....."
QUITE THE OPPOSITE. I HAVEN'T RAN ACROSS ANY DOCUMENTS, SCRIPTURES OR HISTORICAL EVENTS THAT PERTAIN TO A PERSON CLAIMING TO BE MASHIACH *BEFORE* YESHUA/JESUS. THE JEWISH LEADERS OF THAT TIME DID *NOT* GO EASY ON THE PEOPLE. THE ROMAN LEADERS AT THAT TIME DID *NOT* GO EASY ON THE PEOPLE. YOU WOULDN'T BE COMMITED FOR SAYING YOU WERE MASCHIACH OR GODS SON. YOU WOULD BE STONED OR CRUCIFIED FOR BLASPHEMY.
WAS JIM JONES COMMITED? WAS DAVID KORESH COMMITED? IS THE MULTI MILLIONAIRE REV.MOON COMMITED? NOPE. YOU SEE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE CLAIMING TO BE THE "MESSIAH" FOR A REASON. YOU HAVE MORE PEOPLE IN *THIS* AGE CLAIMING TO BE THE MESSIAH THAN IN *ANY* TIME PERIOD KNOWN TO MAN. WALK THE STREETS OF FRISCO OR BERKELY AND IM SURE YOU'RE BOUND TO RUN ACROSS A PERSON WHO SAYS THEY ARE JESUS (LOL) OR THAT JESUS IS SOMEWHERE ON EARTH.
"Christians worship Jesus, but that's not what Jesus supposedly wanted because his message was to worship GOD not him....Christians distorted the religion beyond belief...It's pathetic to me"
NO THE EARLY CATHOLIC CHURCH DISTORTED THE DOCTRINE/SPIRITUAL PATH BEYOND BELIEF. THE EARLY CHRISTIANS (FOLLOWERS OF THE WAY) WERE HUNTED DOWN AND EXECUTED. DO NOT CONFUSE THE TWO. CONCERNING JESUS BEING WORSHIPPED I SUGGEST YOU READ A BIBLE. NOT *ONCE* DID HE FORBID THE WORSHIP OF HIMSELF.
HAVE NICE ONE AND SERIOUSLY BRO DON'T TRY TO QUOTE ME TO MAKE YOUR POSTS VALID.
NOT GOOD NOT GOOD...
:HGK:
lol....i'm not even gonna post in thsi shit no more....people are takin what i say to heart like it's the final answer to all things.....
miggidy, i didn't answer your questions cause i didn't read them....sorry about that....i ain't tryina bash the religion, i just think it's a load of shit.....
@heresy, that's not what i was trying to do....i was just commenting on what you said, and then put my own opinion in it...i think you read to far into the situation.....
@2-0-sixx.....i dunno about reading the bible, that's a waste of my time....but i'm down to eat some shrooms! lol.....
@mizeryU....you're just a straight faggot....nothing you EVER say is relevant.....square..
miggidy, i didn't answer your questions cause i didn't read them....sorry about that....i ain't tryina bash the religion, i just think it's a load of shit.....
@heresy, that's not what i was trying to do....i was just commenting on what you said, and then put my own opinion in it...i think you read to far into the situation.....
@2-0-sixx.....i dunno about reading the bible, that's a waste of my time....but i'm down to eat some shrooms! lol.....
@mizeryU....you're just a straight faggot....nothing you EVER say is relevant.....square..
HERESY,
YOU STRESSED, "
@EDJ YOU AND I ALREADY WENT OVER THIS AND I DESTROYED YOUR J.W. DOCTRINE/DOGMA ALREADY."
PER YOUR PERCEPTION. YOU DIDN'T DESTROY A MUTHA-FUCCIN' THANg. YOU DIDN'T WANT TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION BAK THEN AND NOW YOU HAVE OFFICIALLY LIED. AND MY SHIT AIN'T A JEHOVAH'S WITNESS DOCTRINE. IT'S MY OWN PERSONAL BELIEF BASED ON ALL THE THANgS PRESENTED TO ME.
THEN YOU STRESSED, " IT'S USELESS TO BRING UP THE SAME ARGUMENTS BECAUSE THEY ARE FLAWED."
PER YOUR PERCEPTION ONCE AgAIN. YOU HAVEN'T SHOWED ME THE FLAWS IN THE ARgUMENTS OTHA THAN THE FACT YOU JUDgIN' MEN AND NOT LOOKIN' INTO THE POINT AND ARgUMENT.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "YOU ARE PUTTING EMPHASIS ON WHICH SCRIPTURES ARE ACCURATE/NOT ACCURATE BUT THE BOOK YOU ADHERE TO WAS WRITTEN BY PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T KNOW *ANY* HEBREW, GREEK, LATIN OR ARAMAIC."
WHAT BOOK DO YOU FIgURE I ADHERE TO? I LOOK AT ALL THE SCRIPTURE THRU DIFFERENT SOURCES. I EVEN LOOK UP THE ORIgINAL LANgUAgES AND WHAT WORDS WERE USED. IF YOU HAVE INSIgHT, SHARE IT, DON'T JUST COME BEIN' BLASPHEMOUS WITH BIASES.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "THAT'S LIKE A PERSON WRITING A BOOK ON NEVE CONSOLES WHEN THEY HAVE *NEVER* RECORDED A SONG, BEEN TO A STUDIO OR HEARD MUSIC RECORDED ON A NEVE. YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY TAKE PEOPLE LIKE THAT SERIOUSLY."
JUST LIKE SOME OF THE DISCIPLES WERE TAX COLLECTORS AND SO ON AND DIDN'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT THE WORD, HUH? BUT gREEK, ARAMAIC, AND HEBREW WORDS, PHRASES, AND THE LANgUAgES AS A WHOLE CAN BE LEARNED AND RESEARCHED.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "CONCERNING HELL AND ITS CORRECT MEANING YOU ARE INCORRECT IN SEVERAL AREAS. IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YOU HAVE NO REASON FOR A MESSIAH/SAVIOUR."
EXACTLY. HELL IS A LITERAL PLACE. IT'S YOUR gRAVE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "EVEN THE JEWS BELIEVE IN A LITERAL HELL BUT IT'S A TAD DIFFERENT FROM THE "CHRISTIAN" VERSION. 1 YEAR VS ETERNITY. PURGING VS TORMENT."
SCRIPTURE PLEASE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IF HELL IS THE GRAVE THAT MEANS ANGELS CAN DIE...LOL! 2 Peter 2:4"
THAT'S THE THANg HERESY, YOU CONFUSIN' HELL (SHEOL), WITH TARTARUS, WHICH IS A PLACE FOR DISOBEDIENT ANgELS, BUT RENDERED CORRECTLY TARTARUS DESCRIBED IN 2 PETER 2:4 IS AN ABASED CONDITION. COMPARE EPHESIANS 6:10-12 AND RE. 20:1-3
THEN YOU STRESSED, ""THE CORRECT TERM FOR GRAVE IS QUBER OR QIBRAH."
HOW YOU FIgURE? SHOW ME.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YESHUA/JESUS WAS THE GREATEST LUNATIC AND LIAR TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH."
YEAH, IT'S THE gRAVE, AND THAT'S A LITERAL PLACE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "AN EXAMPLE (WHICH YOU HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER) IS FOUND IN MATT 13:24-43. IN VERSE 24-30 YOU HAVE YESHUA/JESUS GIVING A PARABLE ABOUT WHEAT AND TARES. IN VERSE 36 THE *DISCIPLES* ASK FOR HIM TO EXPLAIN THE PARABLES OF TARES. FROM 37 ON AN EXPLANATION IS GIVEN."
MAN, I TOLD YOU I WOULD gET BAK AT THIS AND WHEN I WAS READY, YOU DIDN'T WANT TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "1.IF HELL IS NOT REAL/LITERAL WHY DID YESHUA/JESUS MENTION A PLACE OF TORMENT, FIRE, WEEPING AND GNASHING IN HIS *EXPLANATION*?"
CAUSE THAT MEANS DESTRUCTION, THE XCOND DEATH. COMPARE PSALM 37:12; 112:10, MATHEW 8:12; 22:13; 24:51; 25:30, AND LUKE 13:28. ALL THOSE TEXTS MENTION EYES WEEPIN' AND gNASHIN' TEETH TO SOMEBODY THAT HAS BEEN "CUT OFF", ALIENATED. AND THE XCOND DEATH IS THAT. YOU gETTIN' BOOTED. KICCED TO THE CURB.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "2.IF HIS EXPLANATION WAS NOT LITERAL THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE DID *NOT* EXPLAIN THE PARABLE TO THE DISCIPLES BUT GAVE THEM ANOTHER PARABLE. WHAT WOULD BE THE USE OF EXPLAINING A PARABLE WITH A PARABLE?"
51ST OF ALL,
I WAS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE XCOND DEATH, ETERNAL DAMNATION.
NOT ANOTHA PARABLE.
XCONDLY,
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE XCOND DEATH IS?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "I GUARANTEE THAT EDJ WILL:
A. AVOID THESE QUESTIONS
OR
B.SAY HE WILL LOOK INTO THEM BUT NEVER ADDRESS THEM (ALMOST THE SAME AS A.)"
TAKE THAT gUARANTEE AND SHOVE IT WHERE YOUR BLASHEMY AND LIES ARE COMIN' FROM. I HAVE FACED YOU SATAN.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "YESHUA/JESUS GAVE MORE SERMONS ABOUT HELL THAN HEAVEN. THAT'S A FACT."
AND? WHAT'S YOUR POINT?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "YESHUA BEING "CREATED" IS ONE OF THE MOST RETARDED DOGMAS/DOCTRINES A PERSON CAN ACCEPT. "FIRST BORN" AND "ONLY BEGOTTEN" ARE TITLES AND IN THE CASE OF YESHUA/JESUS (AND OTHERS) DO NOT REFER TO CHRONOLOGY."
HOW YOU FIgURE? WHY USE THAT TERM IF IT AIN'T THAT? WHAT YOU MAKE OUT OF COLOSSIANS 1:15-17
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IF YESHUA WAS MICHAEL (MICHA'EL) THE ARCH ANGEL THAT WOULD MAKE HIM A RATHER LOW RANKING ANGEL. NO SCRIPTURE EXISTS THAT STATES MICHAEL AND JESUS ARE THE SAME. NO IDEA OR HINT AT THAT IS EVEN GIVEN IN THE BIBLE. I COULD SEE IF A PERSON SAID JESUS WAS A SON OF FIRE (SERAPHIM WHO STAND NEAR THE THRONE OF HA-SHEM) BUT THE J.W. HAVE REDUCED HIM TO AN ARCH ANGEL. ARCH ANGELS ARE RANKED NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE ANGELIC LIST.
NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS WHATSOEVER."
LOW RANKIN'? WHAT YOU MAKE OUT OF DANIEL 10:13 WHERE MICHAEL IS CALLED ONE OF THE FOREMOST PRINCES? OR HOW ABOUT DANIEL 12:1 WHERE MICHAEL IS CALLED "THE gREAT PRINCE? IN JUDE 9 HE IS MENTIONED AS THE ARCHANgEL. THE NAME MICHAEL MEANS "WHO IS LIKE (gOD)". THE NAME EVIDENTLY DESIgNATES MICHAEL AS THE ONE WHO TAKES THE LEAD IN UPHOLDIN YHWH'S SOVEREIgNITY AND DESTROYIN' (gOD)'S ENEMIES.
AT THESSALONIANS 4:16, THE COMMAND OF JESUS CHRIST FOR THE RESURRECTION TO BEgIN IS DESCRIBED AS "THE ARCHANgEL'S CALL" AND JUDE 9 SAYS THAT THE ARCHANgEL IS MICHAEL. SO REASONABLY, THE ARCHANgEL MICHAEL IS JESUS. WHAT'S INTERESTIN' IS THAT THE EXPRESSION "ARCHANgEL IS NEVA FOUND IN PLURAL FORM IN THE SCRIPTURES, THUS IMPLYIN' THERE IS ONLY ONE.
REVELATION 12:7-12 SAYS THAT MICHAEL AND HIS ANgELS WOULD WAR AgAINST SATAN AND HURL HIM AND HIS WICCED ANgELS OUT OF HEAVEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONFERRIN' OF KINgLY AUTHORITY ON CHRIST. JESUS IS LATER DEPICTED AS LEADIN' THE ARMIES OF HEAVEN IN WAR AgAINST THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD(REV. 19:11-16) SO DON'T IT MAKE LOgICAL AND REASONABLE SENSE THAT JESUS WOULD ALSO BE THE ONE TO TAKE ACTION AgAINST THE ONE HE DESCRIBED AS "RULER OF THE WORLD", SATAN THE DEVIL?(JOHN 12:31)
AND IN DANIEL 12:1, IT ASSOCIATES THE "STANDIN' UP OF MICHAEL" TO ACT WITH AUTHORITY WITH "A TIME OF TROUBLE, SUCH AS NEVER HAS BEEN SINCE THERE WAS A NATION TILL THAT TIME". THAT WOULD CERTAINLY FIT THE EXPERIENCE OF THE NATIONS WHEN CHRIST AS HEAVENLY EXECUTIONER TAKES ACTION AgAINST THEM. SO THE EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT THE SON OF (gOD) WAS KNOWN AS MICHAEL BEFORE HE CAME TO EARTH AND IS KNOWN ALSO BY THAT NAME SINCE HIS RETURN TO HEAVEN WHERE HE RESIDES AS THE gLORIFIED SPIRIT SON OF (gOD). THERE gOES YOUR SCRIPTURAL BASIS. AND WHERE DID YOU gET YOUR ANgELIC LIST FROM?
CONTINUED...
YOU STRESSED, "
@EDJ YOU AND I ALREADY WENT OVER THIS AND I DESTROYED YOUR J.W. DOCTRINE/DOGMA ALREADY."
PER YOUR PERCEPTION. YOU DIDN'T DESTROY A MUTHA-FUCCIN' THANg. YOU DIDN'T WANT TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION BAK THEN AND NOW YOU HAVE OFFICIALLY LIED. AND MY SHIT AIN'T A JEHOVAH'S WITNESS DOCTRINE. IT'S MY OWN PERSONAL BELIEF BASED ON ALL THE THANgS PRESENTED TO ME.
THEN YOU STRESSED, " IT'S USELESS TO BRING UP THE SAME ARGUMENTS BECAUSE THEY ARE FLAWED."
PER YOUR PERCEPTION ONCE AgAIN. YOU HAVEN'T SHOWED ME THE FLAWS IN THE ARgUMENTS OTHA THAN THE FACT YOU JUDgIN' MEN AND NOT LOOKIN' INTO THE POINT AND ARgUMENT.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "YOU ARE PUTTING EMPHASIS ON WHICH SCRIPTURES ARE ACCURATE/NOT ACCURATE BUT THE BOOK YOU ADHERE TO WAS WRITTEN BY PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T KNOW *ANY* HEBREW, GREEK, LATIN OR ARAMAIC."
WHAT BOOK DO YOU FIgURE I ADHERE TO? I LOOK AT ALL THE SCRIPTURE THRU DIFFERENT SOURCES. I EVEN LOOK UP THE ORIgINAL LANgUAgES AND WHAT WORDS WERE USED. IF YOU HAVE INSIgHT, SHARE IT, DON'T JUST COME BEIN' BLASPHEMOUS WITH BIASES.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "THAT'S LIKE A PERSON WRITING A BOOK ON NEVE CONSOLES WHEN THEY HAVE *NEVER* RECORDED A SONG, BEEN TO A STUDIO OR HEARD MUSIC RECORDED ON A NEVE. YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY TAKE PEOPLE LIKE THAT SERIOUSLY."
JUST LIKE SOME OF THE DISCIPLES WERE TAX COLLECTORS AND SO ON AND DIDN'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT THE WORD, HUH? BUT gREEK, ARAMAIC, AND HEBREW WORDS, PHRASES, AND THE LANgUAgES AS A WHOLE CAN BE LEARNED AND RESEARCHED.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "CONCERNING HELL AND ITS CORRECT MEANING YOU ARE INCORRECT IN SEVERAL AREAS. IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YOU HAVE NO REASON FOR A MESSIAH/SAVIOUR."
EXACTLY. HELL IS A LITERAL PLACE. IT'S YOUR gRAVE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "EVEN THE JEWS BELIEVE IN A LITERAL HELL BUT IT'S A TAD DIFFERENT FROM THE "CHRISTIAN" VERSION. 1 YEAR VS ETERNITY. PURGING VS TORMENT."
SCRIPTURE PLEASE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IF HELL IS THE GRAVE THAT MEANS ANGELS CAN DIE...LOL! 2 Peter 2:4"
THAT'S THE THANg HERESY, YOU CONFUSIN' HELL (SHEOL), WITH TARTARUS, WHICH IS A PLACE FOR DISOBEDIENT ANgELS, BUT RENDERED CORRECTLY TARTARUS DESCRIBED IN 2 PETER 2:4 IS AN ABASED CONDITION. COMPARE EPHESIANS 6:10-12 AND RE. 20:1-3
THEN YOU STRESSED, ""THE CORRECT TERM FOR GRAVE IS QUBER OR QIBRAH."
HOW YOU FIgURE? SHOW ME.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IF HELL IS NOT A LITERAL PLACE YESHUA/JESUS WAS THE GREATEST LUNATIC AND LIAR TO EVER WALK THE FACE OF THE EARTH."
YEAH, IT'S THE gRAVE, AND THAT'S A LITERAL PLACE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "AN EXAMPLE (WHICH YOU HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER) IS FOUND IN MATT 13:24-43. IN VERSE 24-30 YOU HAVE YESHUA/JESUS GIVING A PARABLE ABOUT WHEAT AND TARES. IN VERSE 36 THE *DISCIPLES* ASK FOR HIM TO EXPLAIN THE PARABLES OF TARES. FROM 37 ON AN EXPLANATION IS GIVEN."
MAN, I TOLD YOU I WOULD gET BAK AT THIS AND WHEN I WAS READY, YOU DIDN'T WANT TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "1.IF HELL IS NOT REAL/LITERAL WHY DID YESHUA/JESUS MENTION A PLACE OF TORMENT, FIRE, WEEPING AND GNASHING IN HIS *EXPLANATION*?"
CAUSE THAT MEANS DESTRUCTION, THE XCOND DEATH. COMPARE PSALM 37:12; 112:10, MATHEW 8:12; 22:13; 24:51; 25:30, AND LUKE 13:28. ALL THOSE TEXTS MENTION EYES WEEPIN' AND gNASHIN' TEETH TO SOMEBODY THAT HAS BEEN "CUT OFF", ALIENATED. AND THE XCOND DEATH IS THAT. YOU gETTIN' BOOTED. KICCED TO THE CURB.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "2.IF HIS EXPLANATION WAS NOT LITERAL THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE DID *NOT* EXPLAIN THE PARABLE TO THE DISCIPLES BUT GAVE THEM ANOTHER PARABLE. WHAT WOULD BE THE USE OF EXPLAINING A PARABLE WITH A PARABLE?"
51ST OF ALL,
I WAS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE XCOND DEATH, ETERNAL DAMNATION.
NOT ANOTHA PARABLE.
XCONDLY,
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE XCOND DEATH IS?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "I GUARANTEE THAT EDJ WILL:
A. AVOID THESE QUESTIONS
OR
B.SAY HE WILL LOOK INTO THEM BUT NEVER ADDRESS THEM (ALMOST THE SAME AS A.)"
TAKE THAT gUARANTEE AND SHOVE IT WHERE YOUR BLASHEMY AND LIES ARE COMIN' FROM. I HAVE FACED YOU SATAN.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "YESHUA/JESUS GAVE MORE SERMONS ABOUT HELL THAN HEAVEN. THAT'S A FACT."
AND? WHAT'S YOUR POINT?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "YESHUA BEING "CREATED" IS ONE OF THE MOST RETARDED DOGMAS/DOCTRINES A PERSON CAN ACCEPT. "FIRST BORN" AND "ONLY BEGOTTEN" ARE TITLES AND IN THE CASE OF YESHUA/JESUS (AND OTHERS) DO NOT REFER TO CHRONOLOGY."
HOW YOU FIgURE? WHY USE THAT TERM IF IT AIN'T THAT? WHAT YOU MAKE OUT OF COLOSSIANS 1:15-17
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IF YESHUA WAS MICHAEL (MICHA'EL) THE ARCH ANGEL THAT WOULD MAKE HIM A RATHER LOW RANKING ANGEL. NO SCRIPTURE EXISTS THAT STATES MICHAEL AND JESUS ARE THE SAME. NO IDEA OR HINT AT THAT IS EVEN GIVEN IN THE BIBLE. I COULD SEE IF A PERSON SAID JESUS WAS A SON OF FIRE (SERAPHIM WHO STAND NEAR THE THRONE OF HA-SHEM) BUT THE J.W. HAVE REDUCED HIM TO AN ARCH ANGEL. ARCH ANGELS ARE RANKED NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE ANGELIC LIST.
NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS WHATSOEVER."
LOW RANKIN'? WHAT YOU MAKE OUT OF DANIEL 10:13 WHERE MICHAEL IS CALLED ONE OF THE FOREMOST PRINCES? OR HOW ABOUT DANIEL 12:1 WHERE MICHAEL IS CALLED "THE gREAT PRINCE? IN JUDE 9 HE IS MENTIONED AS THE ARCHANgEL. THE NAME MICHAEL MEANS "WHO IS LIKE (gOD)". THE NAME EVIDENTLY DESIgNATES MICHAEL AS THE ONE WHO TAKES THE LEAD IN UPHOLDIN YHWH'S SOVEREIgNITY AND DESTROYIN' (gOD)'S ENEMIES.
AT THESSALONIANS 4:16, THE COMMAND OF JESUS CHRIST FOR THE RESURRECTION TO BEgIN IS DESCRIBED AS "THE ARCHANgEL'S CALL" AND JUDE 9 SAYS THAT THE ARCHANgEL IS MICHAEL. SO REASONABLY, THE ARCHANgEL MICHAEL IS JESUS. WHAT'S INTERESTIN' IS THAT THE EXPRESSION "ARCHANgEL IS NEVA FOUND IN PLURAL FORM IN THE SCRIPTURES, THUS IMPLYIN' THERE IS ONLY ONE.
REVELATION 12:7-12 SAYS THAT MICHAEL AND HIS ANgELS WOULD WAR AgAINST SATAN AND HURL HIM AND HIS WICCED ANgELS OUT OF HEAVEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONFERRIN' OF KINgLY AUTHORITY ON CHRIST. JESUS IS LATER DEPICTED AS LEADIN' THE ARMIES OF HEAVEN IN WAR AgAINST THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD(REV. 19:11-16) SO DON'T IT MAKE LOgICAL AND REASONABLE SENSE THAT JESUS WOULD ALSO BE THE ONE TO TAKE ACTION AgAINST THE ONE HE DESCRIBED AS "RULER OF THE WORLD", SATAN THE DEVIL?(JOHN 12:31)
AND IN DANIEL 12:1, IT ASSOCIATES THE "STANDIN' UP OF MICHAEL" TO ACT WITH AUTHORITY WITH "A TIME OF TROUBLE, SUCH AS NEVER HAS BEEN SINCE THERE WAS A NATION TILL THAT TIME". THAT WOULD CERTAINLY FIT THE EXPERIENCE OF THE NATIONS WHEN CHRIST AS HEAVENLY EXECUTIONER TAKES ACTION AgAINST THEM. SO THE EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT THE SON OF (gOD) WAS KNOWN AS MICHAEL BEFORE HE CAME TO EARTH AND IS KNOWN ALSO BY THAT NAME SINCE HIS RETURN TO HEAVEN WHERE HE RESIDES AS THE gLORIFIED SPIRIT SON OF (gOD). THERE gOES YOUR SCRIPTURAL BASIS. AND WHERE DID YOU gET YOUR ANgELIC LIST FROM?
CONTINUED...