Swine Flu Offical Thread
- Thread starter NoxiousN8
- Start date
look at the times, if there's fear from all those things and if a pandemic breaks out there will be people in dark places that will take advantage. im not sayin this virus is man made , im sayin they will see this as an opportunity to seize more power . i wouldnt put it pass them tho if it is man made
really don't see what the hell is so scary , PEOPLE ARE DYING IN MEXICO . the people infected here in america how many of them died ? people die of colds ,flue things that are very curable in many part of mexico everyday
I was actually building an argument over several paragraphs, but you either were reading and answering or quote mining (that favorite creationist tactic)
Who is saying that? Journalists or scientists? I am not suggesting the what answer is, I really don't know. Fact is it happened, and if all you need is simultaneous infection by three viruses, that's not very hard to imagine as it was already pointed out
I've seen this before, so what? Any proof it was a conspiracy?
It's not an opinion, it is an obvious fact
My claims are verified by whoever they have to verified by, you are not in that list.
True, but that still does not warrant jumping to the "It's a conspiracy" conclusion every time, with no evidence. That is some very bad science
I interpret "border issue" as the wave of hungry Mexicans that will sweep through the border in a few years to a couple decades; that's why you got the response you got. Apparently we meant different things
Who is saying that? Journalists or scientists? I am not suggesting the what answer is, I really don't know. Fact is it happened, and if all you need is simultaneous infection by three viruses, that's not very hard to imagine as it was already pointed out
I've seen this before, so what? Any proof it was a conspiracy?
It's not an opinion, it is an obvious fact
My claims are verified by whoever they have to verified by, you are not in that list.
True, but that still does not warrant jumping to the "It's a conspiracy" conclusion every time, with no evidence. That is some very bad science
I interpret "border issue" as the wave of hungry Mexicans that will sweep through the border in a few years to a couple decades; that's why you got the response you got. Apparently we meant different things
2 cases confirmed in Marin; the bay's first confirmed cases. The 20-month old already recovered, her 60 year old grandmother has a "mild" case.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/28/MN8H17AI5O.DTL
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/28/MN8H17AI5O.DTL
I've yet to quote you out of context. However, you can't say the same. Moreover, you have not built an argument over several paragraphs. But I get it now! You conveniently left out the word THIS in each instance you mentioned "flu"!!! Examples?
Again, we are talking about THIS form of flu, not "flu" but leave it up to you to lie again.
From what I've read both. Use your nifty search engine and you'll see this fact.
It's proof that the lab coats create things, fuck up and don't keep track of it.
And you are not a scientist. None of your claims of being such are testable or falsifiable. In fact, I'll probably contribute more to science in my life then you ever will. In fact, I might make it a point to spread my name in the scientific community as a great thinker and philanthropist. You on the other hand? Well, you'll be stuck here, forever complaining about why nucleotides and religion don't mix. But don't worry, I will make it a point to come back and remind you of your utter defeat and miserable life, poor soul.
Opinion, buddy.
Brush up on correlation and causation. Afterwards, refer to the things I previously posted pertaining to dialectic.
I'll now provide you with more evidence showing how you CONSTANTLY fail to read before you respond. But before I do, I will once again tell you that if you need clarification, or do not understand a persons premise, there is NOTHING wrong with saying so. This is how intelligent people discuss things and how a general understanding emerges. We don't result to fallacies (which you introduce in every thread but suck at hiding) and we certainly don't misquote people and take their words/text out of context (something you constantly do and what finally earned you your Fhag name.)
However, running your mouth, like you're doing now, simply makes you look like a one dimensional and delusional "character" on the siccness. Now here you go.
You said, "Apparently we meant different things", but here is what I initially said about the border problem:
Now, my question is, if we apparently meant different things, why are you commenting on what I'm saying? Moreover, why does your so-called interpretation even matter when I stated exactly what I was talking about?
I was quite clear in what I was talking about, yet in your infinite wisdom you somehow missed all of it. But get this, you completely misinterpret the argument and FAIL to acknowledge that what I'm talking about, is NOT what you're talking about. Moreover, you FAIL to adress the other possibility I stated which is, this could have been done for money.
In closing, what you are talking about, is not an accurate, reasonable or remotely logical interpretation or assessment of what I said could be motivating factors if this was indeed man made. Again, I'm not talking about population reduction, why then are you telling me about it?
Again, we are talking about THIS form of flu, not "flu" but leave it up to you to lie again.
From what I've read both. Use your nifty search engine and you'll see this fact.
It's proof that the lab coats create things, fuck up and don't keep track of it.
And you are not a scientist. None of your claims of being such are testable or falsifiable. In fact, I'll probably contribute more to science in my life then you ever will. In fact, I might make it a point to spread my name in the scientific community as a great thinker and philanthropist. You on the other hand? Well, you'll be stuck here, forever complaining about why nucleotides and religion don't mix. But don't worry, I will make it a point to come back and remind you of your utter defeat and miserable life, poor soul.
Opinion, buddy.
Brush up on correlation and causation. Afterwards, refer to the things I previously posted pertaining to dialectic.
I'll now provide you with more evidence showing how you CONSTANTLY fail to read before you respond. But before I do, I will once again tell you that if you need clarification, or do not understand a persons premise, there is NOTHING wrong with saying so. This is how intelligent people discuss things and how a general understanding emerges. We don't result to fallacies (which you introduce in every thread but suck at hiding) and we certainly don't misquote people and take their words/text out of context (something you constantly do and what finally earned you your Fhag name.)
However, running your mouth, like you're doing now, simply makes you look like a one dimensional and delusional "character" on the siccness. Now here you go.
You said, "Apparently we meant different things", but here is what I initially said about the border problem:
Now, my question is, if we apparently meant different things, why are you commenting on what I'm saying? Moreover, why does your so-called interpretation even matter when I stated exactly what I was talking about?
I was quite clear in what I was talking about, yet in your infinite wisdom you somehow missed all of it. But get this, you completely misinterpret the argument and FAIL to acknowledge that what I'm talking about, is NOT what you're talking about. Moreover, you FAIL to adress the other possibility I stated which is, this could have been done for money.
In closing, what you are talking about, is not an accurate, reasonable or remotely logical interpretation or assessment of what I said could be motivating factors if this was indeed man made. Again, I'm not talking about population reduction, why then are you telling me about it?
