1. because flu has been around for much longer than the science needed to create it has existed, and this has been experimentally confirmed by digging up frozen dead bodies from 1918 form the permafrost in Alaska and recreating the virus from the RNA fragments present in them.
You keep replying without reading. We are not talking about "flu", as we know "flu" has veen around. What we are talking about is THIS form of flu. How do we know THIS form of flu was NOT manmade? This form of flu, has NOT existed since 1918 as they are saying this is a never before seen strain. You just said they recreated the virus from RNA fragments present in the 1918 strain, so why is any of this far-fetched?
because there are flu viruses infecting all sorts of animals and most of them are specific to these species. If flu was man-made, we would have to conclude that all those viruses are man-made too, which is highly unlikely.
Again,
NO ONE,
HERE IN THIS THREAD, has suggested "flu" is man made. However, people are suggesting
THIS strain of flu in particular is man made. Please, start R-E-A-D-I-N-G for once. If you don't understand or need clarification just ask. However, none should be needed as it should be painfully obvious that when someone says, "this flu", or "No, I would say that one wasn't." they do not think or suggest all flu viruses are man made.
because if flu has been around for so long, there had been similar and much worse pandemics long before recombinant DNA technologies were developed, and it exists in the wild and we have plenty of evidence that different flu strains can mix together and create new ones, there is no reason to invoke a conspiracy to explain the one today.
Again, you have people saying for this strain to occur in the wild, there would have to be too many hoops to jump through. And with madness like the following link, we don't really know what's going on. Sorry, but you lab coats dropped the ball once again.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-resulted-in-pandemic/articleshow/4230882.cms
That's a hypothesis consistent with the evidence. However, it is not the simplest hypothesis explaining it.
Your opinion, you are entitled to it.
Why not? It happens all the time, it is just that we don't notice it because it rarely results in lethal strains
I already addressed this.
If you don't understand the biology behind the discussion, why are you trying to argue? I know that the common folks of the street have this distrust towards scientists and think that we are some evil secret society that plots the destruction of the world, but believe me, this is an absurd idea.
No, I understand the biology behind the discussion. However, a disagreement with your view does not mean I don't understand the biology behind it. Moreover, I'm not "the common folks of the street", and generally don't have a distrust of scientist. In the past, I've said our education system needs to improve in the areas of science, math and technology, and have said african americans can benefit greatly from embracing science. However, I do not consider
you a scientist as none of your claims of being a scientist have been verified by anyone here.
I don't think all scientists are part of some evil secret society, and this belief has never been stated or implied by me (I can't speak for anyone else.) However, when you have/had "secret societies" or groups bent on world domination (The Nazi's for example), the american government and a billion dollar industry that is expected to be just under a trillion in a couple of years, you can't sweep it under the rug and blindly believe all scientist have good intentions.
well, you were stating a hypothesis: and I told you why it is not a good one
No you didn't. This is what you said:
And if someone decided to reduce population with a virus, it won't be one that kills less than 10% of the infected
Let me break it down for you because you still don't understand.
Heresy in response to others:
The reason they could possibly be doing this is to make money and to control the border issues.
Fhag in response to Heresy:
If you want to reduce population with a virus this isn't the one.
Read that a couple of times and tell me if you and I are talking about the same thing, or if what you've suggested has been remotely related to my suggestion that this was possibly created to make money or to tighten the borders without complaint.