Rodney Harrison speaks out re: Seymour trade and how Seymour feels about it.

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#81
the 9ers are already the laughing stock. remember their coach pulling his pants down in front of everyone LOL
Most of the league jocks our coach. Only someone looking for a reason to talk shit about the team would bring up that shit.

That laughingstock of a team >>>>> the Seattle Seahawks. What does that make you guys?
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#82
If that were the case he wouldn't have a problem going to Oakland. Everyone knows Al Davis dumps money all over the place when a big name comes to town. I don't think it has anything to do with the contract. He just doesn't want to play for Oakland.

I'm not gonna sit here and talk shit even though most of you raider fans have been running your mouths about the Crabtree situation for a while now. It's basically the same shit. If Crabtree doesn't sign, we basically threw our 1st rounder in the garbage can. If Seymour doesn't report, you guys basically did the same with your 2011 first rounder. It's unfortunate on both ends.
everyone knows Al Davis spends. but seymour just wants to secure the contract. He was already in negotiations with the pats prior to the trade. he didnt see the trade coming at all. we can trade seymour worst case scenario. if we suspend him he still has to honor the one year left on his contract. once again, dont believe the media hype. raiders are public enemy #1.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#83
seriously who the fuck are the seahawks! they aint shit! i may give the raiders shit because theyre rivals but i know they have history and the nfl would feel it if for some reason they got rid of the raiders. But if today they got rid of the seahawks no one would give a fuck outside of seattle. The seahakws are like the sonics no one gives a fuck about you guys! ZERO fucken championships!!!!! go hang up some NFC west titles because thats all you chumps will ever get.
It's true, the Seahawks are just another team. They haven't done anything and will not do anything in the near future. I really don't think anyone outside of Seattle would give a shit if they disappeared and were replaced in the NFL.

What I don't understand is why their fans take every opportunity to hate on the Niners. They are NOT real rivals. The only thing that makes them remotely close to being a rival is the fact they are in our division and we play them twice a year. To me, our only true rivals are the Dallas Cowboys because of the many battles for supremacy. The raiders are only rivals because of proximity. But the Seahawks? Does anyone really care about them?


looks like i struck another nerve today lol
This must be the default response for every time you get put back in your place.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#84
Seymour is not playing for the Raiders, I am pretty sure Al has already offered to hook him up with a fat contract. We can forget about Seymour. I can't believe we screwed off a pick like that. And what's up Tom Cable and his lies? I'm beginning to dislike Cable.
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#85
If that were the case he wouldn't have a problem going to Oakland. Everyone knows Al Davis dumps money all over the place when a big name comes to town. I don't think it has anything to do with the contract. He just doesn't want to play for Oakland.

I'm not gonna sit here and talk shit even though most of you raider fans have been running your mouths about the Crabtree situation for a while now. It's basically the same shit. If Crabtree doesn't sign, we basically threw our 1st rounder in the garbage can. If Seymour doesn't report, you guys basically did the same with your 2011 first rounder. It's unfortunate on both ends.
I agree
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#86
Seymour is not playing for the Raiders, I am pretty sure Al has already offered to hook him up with a fat contract. We can forget about Seymour. I can't believe we screwed off a pick like that. And what's up Tom Cable and his lies? I'm beginning to dislike Cable.
wait, i could have swore you said he was qualified?
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#89
The New England Patriots are crooks man, they flat out robbed us. They gave us a 4th round pick for Moss and we give them a 1st round pick for Seymour and this mf didn't even show up. Now they won't even take him back...
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#90
The New England Patriots are crooks man, they flat out robbed us. They gave us a 4th round pick for Moss and we give them a 1st round pick for Seymour and this mf didn't even show up. Now they won't even take him back...

????? WTF!


hahaha

davis-um yeah hey kraft, this is Al, so umm can you give us that pick back?

kraft-what pick?

davis- you know the one for Seymour

kraft-buyer beware yo!

davis- but my coach said eveything was fine and that this was a smart trade

kraft-sorry man

davis pretty please!!!



ahahaha come on tony WHY WOULD OR SHOULD THEY TAKE HIM BACK???

I have been telling yo ufor years that the raiders problem is the powner and you have always denied it. others like 3vid3nc3 and sol have agreed with me but you always denied it....believe me now?
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#91
They should take him back because this mf never showed up! But I guess it depends on how the trade between the two teams went down and if we could send him back. He hasn't reported to take the physical and I would think you have to pass the physical before the trade becomes "final".
 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
#92
Damn, I'm really really REALLY enjoying this. Just goes to show you what the rest of the league thinks of the Raiders organization
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#93
^^^ Who gives a fuck what the rest of the league thinks, we got a prime time game on the first week of the season. Shows how big the Raiders fanbase is. Go ahead and enjoy it the only one thats really gonna hurt is Seymour although he is already a millionaire and this situation is definitely is not as bad as the Crabtree situation cuz we have the rights to Seymour.
 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
#94
What good is prime time if you guys are gonna get your asses handed to you again like all the other times? And like Chree said in another thread, the crabtree situation is about money, seymour just doesnt wanna be a part of the raiders AT ALL lmao
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
#95
^^^ Who gives a fuck what the rest of the league thinks, we got a prime time game on the first week of the season. Shows how big the Raiders fanbase is. Go ahead and enjoy it the only one thats really gonna hurt is Seymour although he is already a millionaire and this situation is definitely is not as bad as the Crabtree situation cuz we have the rights to Seymour.
oh wow you have the rights to seymour. so far all that has got you is losing a first round pick, a guy that show report to practice and most likely will be gone after this season. go and enjoy your rights to seymour! HA!
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#96
ummm we can trade him still, not that we'll get anything worth a first round pick. When we win more games then the Niners just dont say anything dumb shits unless of course yall wanna look even more like dipshits.
 

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
#98
ummm we can trade him still, not that we'll get anything worth a first round pick. When we win more games then the Niners just dont say anything dumb shits unless of course yall wanna look even more like dipshits.
If, by Tuesday, Seymour is still not in Oakland, the team could place him on a suspended list without pay at any time. That would prohibit him from playing for any team this season and roll over his contract for another year.

While you do have the rights to him, so do the 49ers with Crabtree. The 49ers can`t trade his rights until March, or just let him re-enter the draft if he doesn`t sign.

If the Raiders place Seymour on the suspended list, they might be able to trade his rights during the year, but he still can not play. They would have to, more than likely, have to wait until the off season to try to work out a trade. Because if I were an opposing team, I would not offer anything substantial to Oakland during the year for a player I could not utilize.

This has got to be giving Eugene Parker a headache with these two players. How ironic that both bay area teams are having a difficult time with clients of his.

And I`ll just leave your comment about the better records alone. Your team has only done it about a handful of times over the past 2 decades, so I wouldn`t bet on that if I were you. But you do have that team spirit though!
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#99
lol @ thinking the raiders are gonna win more than the niners...


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
mothafucka, whose yall qb again lol. CNI thanks for pointing that out, you actually provide info, these other niners fans talk out there ass and always end up looking stupid
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,862
113
39
mothafucka, whose yall qb again lol. CNI thanks for pointing that out, you actually provide info, these other niners fans talk out there ass and always end up looking stupid

a guy with a winning record, and a record better than JRs