Psycho Logic said:
I'm saying.. The majority of of Muslims are not violent.
But the majority of violent extremists are Muslim.
But the majority of violent extremists are Muslim.
Well, I don’t know about that. You got the KKK (Christian), The Order (Christian), various right-wing christian extremists in the US (abortion clinic bombings, anti-gay violence (jesushatesfags.com, etc)) and abroad, the Jewish Defense League, Lord's Resistance Army (Christian/Pegan), Kach (Jewish), Combat 18 (British Neo-Nazi's), the Ireland conflict, etc. Plus you also have to consider all of the violent Political organizations like the Tamil Tigers (who have a special squad of elite suicide troops, called the Black Tigers that are responsible for more suicide bombings than any other group and considered to be the most effective unit of its kind in the world) for example, who are religious but aren't fighting because of religion.
Plus, Islamic fundamentalism is a relatively new phenomenon. The original Lebanese and Palestinian terrorists were more into extreme left wing politics than religion.
If there is indeed more terrorist activity coming from Islam, this doesn’t mean it’s because there is a difference with the religion compared to others, it has to do with the different socio economic conditions of the societies that practice these religions. The Middle East is and has been exploited by the west for its oil and other resources. The populations of Arab nations have been exploited by their leaders as well who have maintained vice like grip of control by utilizing Islam as a tool of oppression. Religion is a tool of oppression especially when religious enthusiasm can be directed against an infidel enemy like the West. This was the case with Hitler and the Jews. We have to keep these things in mind when we see people rioting over a cartoon and ask ourselves, “are they really rioting over a cartoon or is it much deeper than that?”