^^floyd himself said he wasn't doing a 50/50.
and I don't know where you get the "$40 million is 5 times more money" than pac has ever earned, that's BS. I guess Manny hasn't been on the Forbes list of highest paid athletes the past several years in a row.
You're probably going by one of those live gate purses that doesn't include PPV revenue etc. that floyd posted on twitter (why would he post that unless he's trying to justify his case for taking so much more money, right?).
Anyways, I don't know how anyone can try to justify this. It's not just the PPV it's the live gate which the all time record is $19 million, obviously this would shatter that as well, then there is closed circuit and anything else. So taking a flat fee of $40 mil in the richest fight in history is ludicrous.
I think Oscar made the mistake of doing something similar when he fought Trinidad and of course that fight went on to break the PPV record (at that time) and oscar got paid way less than he would have if he had a percentage. This would obviously dwarf that in comparison.
and I don't know where you get the "$40 million is 5 times more money" than pac has ever earned, that's BS. I guess Manny hasn't been on the Forbes list of highest paid athletes the past several years in a row.
You're probably going by one of those live gate purses that doesn't include PPV revenue etc. that floyd posted on twitter (why would he post that unless he's trying to justify his case for taking so much more money, right?).
Anyways, I don't know how anyone can try to justify this. It's not just the PPV it's the live gate which the all time record is $19 million, obviously this would shatter that as well, then there is closed circuit and anything else. So taking a flat fee of $40 mil in the richest fight in history is ludicrous.
I think Oscar made the mistake of doing something similar when he fought Trinidad and of course that fight went on to break the PPV record (at that time) and oscar got paid way less than he would have if he had a percentage. This would obviously dwarf that in comparison.