For the Bush Haters. . .

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#81
nefar559 said:
you dont listen to any of the music from these forums, you said it your self a while back..
see what i mean by your such a big ass LIAR. i never said that, what i said is that i dont listen to to much rap, but that the little bit of rap that i do listen to is SICCMADE MUZICC (mostly LYNCH), and X-RAIDED.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#82
KrypticFlowz said:
i hate the fact that bush runs the country
thats your freedom to feel that way as it is our freedom to feel that he is the best president since Ronald Reagan

KrypticFlowz said:
and anyone who supports him is completely ignorant to the shit he does and does not do.
but you are so smart and know so much huh??

do you know what he does and doesnt do??

KrypticFlowz said:
everyone who posted in this forum supporting bush really doesnt know what the fuck is going on and how the U.S is being run.
and i think that any1 who posts in this forum opposing bush really doesnt know what the fuck is going on and how the U.S is being run.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#83
Mcleanhatch said:
you guys are funny, first you guys try and make the case that there are no WMD's then go on to say that we gave Sadam the WMD's

damn, i hate explaing this over and over again...do u read the shit that i type? why do you always make you self look stupid?

what was the bombing during Clinton for? what were the UN inspections for?

the bombing destoryed most of the weapons, but what was more effective was the UN inspections in destorying his WMD. WHy do u think Hans Blix agree with it?
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#86
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

Mcleanhatch said:
those 3 examples were acts of terror by Islamic radicals against the USA
you didnt read what i said:

"i think he was talking about ppl outside our country attacking the US. "



btw, what i should have said is:

i think he was talking about ppl outside our country attacking US territory
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#87
nefar559 said:
what was the bombing during Clinton for?
honestly, i think it was just a distraction from his impeachment trial.

nefar559 said:
the bombing destoryed most of the weapons
i dont know that do you know that???

nefar559 said:
WHy do u think Hans Blix agree with it?
because he never wanted to find weapons because if he did it would point out his incompetance because for years he couldnt find any weapons in Iraq.

he even gave south africa a clean bill of health and said that after inspecting that country he came to the conclusion that they had no WMD's only to be made a fool of a couple years later when South Africa announced that they wanted to come clean and give up all their WMD's and invited the UN back in and let them destroy all their weapons
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#89
Mcleanhatch said:
honestly, i think it was just a distraction from his impeachment trial.



i dont know that do you know that???



because he never wanted to find weapons because if he did it would point out his incompetance because for years he couldnt find any weapons in Iraq.

he even gave south africa a clean bill of health and said that after inspecting that country he came to the conclusion that they had no WMD's only to be made a fool of a couple years later when South Africa announced that they wanted to come clean and give up all their WMD's and invited the UN back in and let them destroy all their weapons
bombing were taking place before the impeachment you idiot .. i believe you talking about the Sudan bombing, like it was going to distract the impeachment, you gotta be a fool to believe that.

read a book

JAJAJAAJAJAJ, always alleging some stupid shit

this proves your from the "IDIOT WING"
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#90
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

nefar559 said:
"i think he was talking about ppl outside our country attacking the US. "

btw, what i should have said is:

i think he was talking about ppl outside our country attacking US territory
US embassies in other countries are US territory.

but what you really meant is attacking our mainland.

so what about the first example that i posted World Trade Center in 1993???
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#91
Mcleanhatch said:
ya, the same way you cant prove newsmax is wrong, thats why you always come up with "ultra right wing extremists"
i've alway proven all your shit wrong..when u try to prove my shit wrong, you alway make up stupid allegations, that i've never heard of before.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#92
nefar559 said:
i've alway proven all your shit wrong..
LOL, ok whatever you say. ya with conspiricy theories from websites such as

motherjones.com
guerrillanews.com
fair.org
zmag.com
ect,ect.........

nefar559 said:
when u try to prove my shit wrong, you alway make up stupid allegations, that i've never heard of before.
because you are bainwashed, all you listen to is extreme leftwing/socialist/communist media outlets.

i mean you claim the mainstream media is conservative, and the sad thing is you really believe it, when every1 else out (real people) there really knows it is liberally bias.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#93
Mcleanhatch said:
LOL, ok whatever you say. ya with conspiricy theories from websites such as

motherjones.com
guerrillanews.com
fair.org
zmag.com
ect,ect.........
you been shut down by many ppl, not just me.

i have never posted anything from guerillanews.com.

other than that, none of the have "conspiricy theories" and you can't EVEN prove that.






Mcleanhatch said:
because you are bainwashed, all you listen to is extreme leftwing/socialist/communist media outlets.

i mean you claim the mainstream media is conservative, and the sad thing is you really believe it, when every1 else out (real people) there really knows it is liberally bias.
hey man, the facts have been laid down by me numberous times, if you dont want to believe, who is the one who is brainwashed?
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,992
81
48
46
#94
As a journalism graduate with concentrations in mass media, I would have to say that the media in the US tends to follow the position that our country is currently in. During conserative admistrative years, the media tends to be conservative, and vice versa.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#95
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
#97
SGC~CEO said:
i'm not buyin this shit at all.
Well, that's okay. I don't buy the shit that Iraq is WMD free. Maybe someday I, along with many others, will be proved wrong. I can live with that. I just won't trust the government anymore.

But if you are also disputing the FACT about the air force, you are wrong. He had jets, which he buried under dirt at an abondoned military base which we found I think in July.
 
Apr 11, 2003
1,575
0
0
gooeygraphics.com
#98
bottom line is US KNEW they had WMD.

WMD were never found. Inspectors never found shit and the main piece of INTELLIGENCE was forged.


end of story.


You say Sadam is such a threat but we still haven't invaded N.Korea which is more of a threat. AND we posess the same weapons which makes us just as much a threat to the world as anybody else. so i don't really see how there is even an argument.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
UKantCMe said:
WMD were never found. Inspectors never found shit and the main piece of INTELLIGENCE was forged.
it was a piece not a main piece and it pertained to Nuclear weapons, which we dont know if they have/had.

what we do know they have/had and is a matter of time until we find them is Chemical and Biological WMD's