For the Bush Haters. . .

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#61
Re: Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

Mcleanhatch said:
so who was the president when the WTC was blown up in 1993.

who was the presient when two of our Embassies in Africa were blown to rubble.

so who was our president in 2000 when terrorists almost sunk one of our battle ships (USS Cole) off the coast of Yemen
i think he was talking about ppl outside our country attacking the US.

also

shit, clinton supported the sacntions on iraq, iraq also bombed iraq nuclear weapon sites, which UN inspector left, and later in the media said it was becuase Saddam kicked them out.

sanction alone killed 2 millions ppl in iraq, (women innocnet children)

clinton also supported the bombing of a Sudan pharmaceutical plant, which he accused of manufactoring bio weapons, which later turned out to be false. that bombing alone not only killed the ppl in there, but all the other ppl who were getting cheap medicine from the plant, some estimate that 250,000 died becuase they couldn't get the medicine.

saddam posed no threat to the US

so fuck bush and clinton
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#62
Mcleanhatch said:
maybe because you arent privilaged to top secret information

what a load of shit, if there was such "top secret information" why haven't we found them? they said they had them.


Mcleanhatch said:
and not finding any drugs, but instead finding a couple of bongs, some hyperdermic needles, a couple of cases of ephederine, maybe a couple of kilos of novicaine, but no drugs. no meth, no weed, no cocaine, no heroin. ya your right
all which were supplied by the US when Saddam was our right hand man.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#63
Mcleanhatch said:
why?? do we not fit your steroetype??
you dont belong here period. serious take you ass to some country forum.

you dont listen to any of the music from these forums, you said it your self a while back..
 
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#65
stupid people have invaded GOM, i hate the fact that bush runs the country, and anyone who supports him is completely ignorant to the shit he does and does not do. everyone who posted in this forum supporting bush really doesnt know what the fuck is going on and how the U.S is being run. then the idiots who say "if you dont like it leave", what the fuck would i wanna do that for? thats like going back to the 60's and tellin civil rights activists that if they dont like it here leave. why leave when we should be changing things?
 

grav

Sicc OG
May 4, 2002
119
36
0
43
www.guiness.com
#66
aright im bout to lace yall on some game

I enjoy giving all my tax dollars to crackheads and bums.
Come on guys George Bush is going to war just for oil. Saddam Husien ios not a terrorist or murderer. come oguys hes a nice man weho loves his people and the US. I mean come on he has never ever threatened or harmed anybody anytime. The wtc bombing was just alquida saddam never supported there cause and he never funded therte organization and he never assisted them when America went over to there country to captyure.

You people who hate on Bush
Fuck YOU
Kryptic flows - What is it that Bush is doing and not doing that we are unaware of
 

grav

Sicc OG
May 4, 2002
119
36
0
43
www.guiness.com
#67
Look through out this post for Pimperoni and Mcleanhatchs posts. Take what they typed and attempt to prove them wrong. Oh wait a minute its hard huh becasuse everythang they typed is true. Look on internet history books. Does anyone here know that Iraq has more working hospitols schools and electricity thanit ever hasd in the city. Most parts of Iraq except bagdhad are improveing. But you wouldnt know this cuz I saw it once on tv. Now i would think they would make a big deal about this but then i remembered that the tv netyworks hate bush so much that they will not tell you this. They love Clinton so much thery dont ever mention the fact we had osahma in ouir grasps three times while he was president but he didnt want his image to look loke he was a war monger. I just spit real facts. So try and prove me wrong BITCH.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,992
81
48
46
#68
Re: aright im bout to lace yall on some game

grav said:
Saddam Husien ios not a terrorist or murderer. come oguys hes a nice man weho loves his people and the US. I mean come on he has never ever threatened or harmed anybody anytime.
Not a murderer? Loves the US? Are you fuckin kidding me? I hope your kidding man. Saddam has publically spoken out on his hate of the US... and he has murdered his people, including his own daughters husbands. You act like the man is Santa Claus or some shit.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#70
grav said:
Does anyone here know that Iraq has more working hospitols schools and electricity thanit ever hasd in the city. Most parts of Iraq except bagdhad are improveing. But you wouldnt know this cuz I saw it once on tv. Now i would think they would make a big deal about this but then i remembered that the tv netyworks hate bush so much that they will not tell you this. They love Clinton so much thery dont ever mention the fact we had osahma in ouir grasps three times while he was president but he didnt want his image to look loke he was a war monger. I just spit real facts. So try and prove me wrong BITCH.
damn, i'm sick and tried of people like you talking about one sided stuff, that doesn't really matter much.

all these bush lovers, always diss clinton, like we fucken loved him or something. they are part of the same agenda!

IRaq was a first world nation, before the first gulf war., so they had all those schools, and hospitals, you talk about. it was the sanctions that fucked them up. How were the suppose to support them with sanctions in placed?

shit, clinton supported the sacntions on iraq, Clinton also bombed iraq nuclear weapon sites, which UN inspector left, and later in the media said it was becuase Saddam kicked them out.

sanction alone killed 2 millions ppl in iraq, (women innocnet children)

Clinton also supported a coup that failed, in iraq.

clinton also supported the bombing of a Sudan pharmaceutical plant, which he accused of manufactoring bio weapons, which later turned out to be false. that bombing alone not only killed the ppl in there, but all the other ppl who were getting cheap medicine from the plant, some estimate that 250,000 died becuase they couldn't get the medicine.

saddam posed no threat to the US

so fuck bush and clinton
 
Sep 3, 2002
2,870
2,679
113
40
#72
InDo's implications

I don't really care about what Bush's actions are because If I were in his position I'm not exactly sure what I'd be doing but Damn can y'all not see Hes A FUCKIN IDIOT!!!!!

George bush Junior gives the Least amount of public speaches and avoids interviews more then any President in History next to Ronald Reagan......

Because he can't process thought or answer questions on the spot like a charismatic President who should have the knoweledge and power within to run our country.

He avoids The spotlight because He'll say some Retarded shit Like "these are the guys who almost killed my daddy" Or "you have blacks in Brazil?'"

or how about when this ignorant muthacka said "BRING IT ON"
I'm sure some of y'all loved that shit but the Fact is BUSH is not the muthafucka whos gonna be on the frontline.........

It doesn't take a Republican or Democrat to see that BUSH is a Handicapped SLow muthafucka.........
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,992
81
48
46
#73
LOL, "Bring it on." You know there was time when American presidents used to lead thier army into battle. You put any of these presidents on the frontline and theyll shit thier pants. People who become president these days is doing it because they lack nutts.
 

grav

Sicc OG
May 4, 2002
119
36
0
43
www.guiness.com
#74
sorry nefer559 - i got caried away
melotrauma - hell yeah im fuckin kidding
tremendoindo - you will never hear his speaches or reagans because of the medias bias opinion. notice how they constantly talk shit about republicans and how they lick the democrats nuts. the media wont play that shit in order to make bushs image look bad. Now those quotes were pretty fuckin hilarious i didnt realize he said "bring it on" but still why are u bitching about fact he said that. I know the fact that Saddam almost killed Bushs father doesnt bother you , but it does bother him. If you were president and youre father was an ex pres who almost got killed by a terrorist id imagine you would be thinking about doing something about that. idon know thas jus my othoughts about that. Maybe were living in a country thats just a bunch of bitches. thats how it seems most of the time.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
#75
KrypticFlowz said:
why leave when we should be changing things?
Fine, then don't leave. YOU change our country. If it's that simple, then do it. I would honestly like to know what you have done to change our country. You just had a big chance to change California.

Anyways, Saddam more than likely had the weapons. He hid them and was waiting until the sanctions were lifted so he could bring them back out. Asking why he did not use them on us when we invaded? The same reason he did not use his air force. He buried the weapons, just like he buried his air force. We only found the jets about two or three months ago. What a great leader. I mean, we're the infidels invading holy land, so why did he not provide the jets and chemical weapons for his men to fight us with? Because he is trying to play psychological games by portraying us as the aggressor and him and his country as the victims.
 
Sep 22, 2003
86
0
0
48
#76
grav said:
you will never hear his [Bush's] speaches or reagans because of the medias bias opinion. notice how they constantly talk shit about republicans and how they lick the democrats nuts. the media wont play that shit in order to make bushs image look bad.
LMAO! I can't believe people are still trying to say there is a liberal media bias. That shit cracks me up. It's especially good when they try and point out how all liberals, including the "liberal media," love Bill Clinton. Shit, the media tried to destroy Bill Clinton. Any hint, not proof just a hint, of a Clinton scandal brought on a total media onslaught. Give me a break, and start taking your news from varied sources, not just fox news, hot talk 560, and Michael Savage.
 

28g w/o the bag

politically incorrect
Jan 18, 2003
21,677
6,953
113
metro's jurisdiction
siccness.net
#77
AdolfOliverBush said:
Anyways, Saddam more than likely had the weapons. He hid them and was waiting until the sanctions were lifted so he could bring them back out. Asking why he did not use them on us when we invaded? The same reason he did not use his air force. He buried the weapons, just like he buried his air force. We only found the jets about two or three months ago. What a great leader. I mean, we're the infidels invading holy land, so why did he not provide the jets and chemical weapons for his men to fight us with? Because he is trying to play psychological games by portraying us as the aggressor and him and his country as the victims.
i'm not buyin this shit at all.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#79
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

Mcleanhatch[/i] [B] so who was the president when the WTC was blown up in 1993. who was the presient when two of our Embassies in Africa were blown to rubble. so who was our president in 2000 when terrorists almost sunk one of our battle ships (USS Cole) off the coast of Yemen[/B][/QUOTE] [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by nefar559 said:
i think he was talking about ppl outside our country attacking the US.
those 3 examples were acts of terror by Islamic radicals against the USA
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#80
nefar559 said:
what a load of shit, if there was such "top secret information" why haven't we found them? they said they had them.

all which were supplied by the US when Saddam was our right hand man.
you guys are funny, first you guys try and make the case that there are no WMD's then go on to say that we gave Sadam the WMD's