For the Bush Haters. . .

proppa · Sep 23, 2003

who cares about weapons or iraq.

i want my money!!!!!!!!!!!!! stop taking from those who have ambition and goals!!!!!!!!!! and work hard to make them happen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

miggidy · Sep 23, 2003

For the Bush Haters. . .

And your point is????
Fuck Bush and Clinton,
they're both puppets to the same master....

MC_PM$ · Sep 23, 2003

Keep in mind that the CIA and president officials know a lot of shit that is going on there that we don't. There's a reason the government does not leak shit out, there are probably iraqi sleeper agents in the US that would use the information that the US government gives to the public against them!

nefar559 · Sep 23, 2003

Pimperoni said:

I challange anyone that doesn't like President Bush to read all of these quotes and post an intellegent response.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to Develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line?"
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has .... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Sadism continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
Dec, 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep.
- Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to Miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES???

HUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.............................

shit, clinton supported the sacntions on iraq, iraq also bombed iraq nuclear weapon sites, which UN inspector left, and later in the media said it was becuase Saddam kicked them out.

sanction alone killed 2 millions ppl in iraq, (women innocnet children)

clinton also supported the bombing of a Sudan pharmaceutical plant, which he accused of manufactoring bio weapons, which later turned out to be false. that bombing alone not only killed the ppl in there, but all the other ppl who were getting cheap medicine from the plant, some estimate that 250,000 died becuase they couldn't get the medicine.

saddam posed no threat to the US

so fuck bush and clinton

TrEmEnDo InDo · Sep 24, 2003

it seems....

all the Bush supporters are at a loss of words.........

The fucked up thing is, America did not vote this man into office

nefar559 · Sep 24, 2003

Re: it seems....

TrEmEnDo InDo said:

even amoung them self they are starting to loose support for bush, Bush's popularity is at his all time low.

Ethereal · Sep 24, 2003

Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

nefar559 said:

Do you honestly believe that?

MizeryU · Sep 24, 2003

if he did pose a threat to us then he should proly still hold the same threat right so whats your point

nefar559 · Sep 24, 2003

Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

Nitro the Guru said:

CIA: Seven Months Before 9/11, the Agency Said Iraq Posed No Threat to the US
http://www.counterpunch.org/leopold06272003.html

C.I.A. Director Suggests Iraq May Not Strike Unless Provoked
http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/10.10B.cia.iraq.htm

Ethereal · Sep 24, 2003

Im asking for your opinion, not alledged facts.

Do YOU?

nefar559 · Sep 24, 2003

Nitro the Guru said:

listen smart guy,

my opinion has been stated, which was then followed by:

Nitro the Guru said:

and for comfirmation, becuase that was the point of question (not for my opinion again) i stated:

nefar559 said:

28g w/o the bag · Sep 24, 2003

Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

Nitro the Guru said:

i do

UKantCMe · Sep 26, 2003

Pimperoni said:

don't you see thats the mentality that has put us in this position today. you and a lot of these people in office feel we need to step in and play king everwhere in the fuckin world.

fact is, we put Saddam in power. We also helped Osama and look what happened. and ofcourse we're gonna put someone else in office in Iraq again real soon... if they ever find saddam...

do you think the majority of the world would despise americans today if we minded our own business.

Pimperoni · Sep 26, 2003

Minding your own business is one thing
Not paying attention to a snowball rolling down a cliff can fuck up your village though

I hope that I don't have to elaborate on how that applies to this situation....

Listen up,
People hate Bush so bad they can't see the good he's done and that's pretty bad. The wars between parties have gone back and forth for years, but it's out of control now. These guys like Al Franken are off the deep end.... he's just pure hatred. It's kinda sad to watch. It's not about issues, it's just about "WE HATE BUSH" and we'll do anything to spread the hatred

UKantCMe · Sep 26, 2003

you don't have to explain but i don't see how that applies to this situation. bottom line is there is no proof of the alleged WMD.

you do know that the US poses more risk to the rest of the world than Iraq does right? so according to your snowball theory... i don't get it...

so far there has been no valid reason to invade iraq other than trying to take over their oil.

if you can understand what bush has done, then you'd understand why so many people are strongly anti-bush. he has broken more laws in his quest to take over iraq than saddam has given reasons to be invaded. you don't see that?

Mcleanhatch · Sep 27, 2003

franknitty said:

maybe because you arent privilaged to top secret information

franknitty said:

and not finding any drugs, but instead finding a couple of bongs, some hyperdermic needles, a couple of cases of ephederine, maybe a couple of kilos of novicaine, but no drugs. no meth, no weed, no cocaine, no heroin. ya your right

franknitty said:

if it prevents another 9-11 to me it is worth it, if it can bring an end to the Israeli/Palistinian conflict it is worth it to me.

Mcleanhatch · Sep 27, 2003

Caput187um said:

why?? do we not fit your steroetype??

Caput187um said:

actually the Republican have a disregard for those who are to lazy to make something of themselves, and who always want to find some1 to blame, while they DO have a strong desire to serve those who have the will to make something of themselves.

Mcleanhatch · Sep 27, 2003

Re: Re: Re: For the Bush Haters. . .

MeloTrauma said:

so who was the president when the WTC was blown up in 1993.

who was the presient when two of our Embassies in Africa were blown to rubble.

so who was our president in 2000 when terrorists almost sunk one of our battle ships (USS Cole) off the coast of Yemen

Mcleanhatch · Sep 27, 2003

BIGTOE said:

Tell me exactly what has been exposed about him???

nefar559 · Sep 27, 2003

Mcleanhatch said:

for starters

Bush's Other Lies
David Corn, The Nation
http://alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=16832

For the Bush Haters. . .

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

politically incorrect

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG