For the Bush Haters. . .

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
UKantCMe said:
so what if they have them. we have them.
ya, and so what if some1 pulls another 9-11 but instead of using planes they instead use Chemical/Biological weapons in one of our major cities and kills off 100's of thousands of Americans!

do you still think it is OK if they have them because we have them??
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
UKantCMe said:
and if he is such a threat, i think being personally attacked and invaded would be a good reason to let them bad boys loose. don't you?
We strengthened the threat. That's why they are still hunting Saddam; because if we don't kill him, then he is going to seek revenge, there is no doubt in my mind. We crossed the line by killing his family, now we are going to have to take what's coming to us. I agree with taking action on this country, but they went about the wrong way.
 
Apr 11, 2003
1,575
0
0
gooeygraphics.com
Mcleanhatch said:
ya, and so what if some1 pulls another 9-11 but instead of using planes they instead use Chemical/Biological weapons in one of our major cities and kills off 100's of thousands of Americans!

do you still think it is OK if they have them because we have them??

what you fail to realize is that if someone wants to pull another 9/11 on us they will. BOTTOM LINE. YOU CAN'T STOP IT. you can take over IRAQ, but you won't take over the extremists spirits. iraq is conquered, minus sadam is still living, right? yet US soldiers are still getting killed daily.

so you are saying we should take over the rest of the world and force our views on everyone else, and we should be the ONLY ones wit enough weapons to fuck up everybody else? that's the only way you can prevent something like that happening.

that's why we're in this position, cuz nosy ass neighbors like you want to control everything.

PLUS, 9/11 was done by a group not a country and that group is still active. so the US hasn't really accomplished anything. say sadam does get murdered, you think his people will like us after that, or will they want to seek revenge even more?


Furthermore, the US is responsible for gettin Sadam started wit this biological technology. And on top of that who do you think put Sadam in power??? And when/if sadam does get peeled, who do you think is gonna put someone NEW in power???


your whole thought is irrelevant. anyone can attack us and taking over more countries is only gonna make the possiblity of another attack greater. and by using a "chemical/biological" threat as justification only proves you watch too much tv and don't think logically enough about the bigger picture. you've been brainwashed.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
UKantCMe said:
what you fail to realize is that if someone wants to pull another 9/11 on us they will. BOTTOM LINE. YOU CAN'T STOP IT.
so we shouldnt try. we should just let them come and get us because they are going to get us anyway.

UKantCMe said:
so you are saying we should take over the rest of the world and force our views on everyone else,

and we should be the ONLY ones wit enough weapons to fuck up everybody else?
1st question-- NO we shouldnt and we arent.

2nd question--- no we shouldnt be the only ones with WMD's but i do think that the others that do have them should be responsible countryies, i mean i have no problem with great brittian, france, russia, and/or israel because they are responsible countries whose sole purpose of having these weapons is the same as our PROTECTION. we cannot allow a rogue state especially one thats wants to see us destroyed proliferate these weapons at will just because we have them.

UKantCMe said:
that's why we're in this position, cuz nosy ass neighbors like you want to control everything.
nosey ass neighbors like me dont want to see our friends and family destroyed in mass numbers because we refused to fight some1 is out to destroy us.

what if we felt the same way and left Hitler alone, and he got the bomb, do you know what our country would look like right now???

UKantCMe said:
PLUS, 9/11 was done by a group not a country and that group is still active. so the US hasn't really accomplished anything.
i would disagree to a certain extent. and this is why, i feel that for Osama to pull off something that big he needed the help of some kind of government agency like
Iraq: look up Salman Pak on google
Saudi Arabia: how many of the 9-11 hijackers were from SA

and we have accomplished alote as we have either captured/killed two thirds of AllQaeda senior members.

UKantCMe said:
so the US hasn't really accomplished anything. say sadam does get murdered, you think his people will like us after that, or will they want to seek revenge even more?
are you trying to tell me the people of Iraq loved Sadam Hussein??

did you see the lfirst Zogby poll out of Iraq in which Iraqies were polled and 67% of them said them were glad that sadam was gone and that they thought their country was going to get altoe getter.

UKantCMe said:
Furthermore, the US is responsible for gettin Sadam started wit this biological technology.
ok, i think every1 can agree with that.

UKantCMe said:
And on top of that who do you think put Sadam in power???
i know we didnt. he rose to power within the Bathe Party same way hitler did in the Nazi party

UKantCMe said:
And when/if sadam does get peeled, who do you think is gonna put someone NEW in power???
the people of Iraq have you not heard in the news about what the US appointed Iraq National Congress is doing right now??? they are drafting up a constiution by which the country will follow, where the Iraqi people will be in change of their own destiny.
 
Apr 11, 2003
1,575
0
0
gooeygraphics.com
so we shouldnt try. we should just let them come and get us because they are going to get us anyway.
no, but we should respect them. we have no right to go in there and take over. we've already punished them by all the sanctions that have been put on them. plus all the oil they supply the world with i think they deserve a little more than that.


no we shouldnt be the only ones with WMD's but i do think that the others that do have them should be responsible countryies, i mean i have no problem with great brittian, france, russia, and/or israel because they are responsible countries whose sole purpose of having these weapons is the same as our PROTECTION. we cannot allow a rogue state especially one thats wants to see us destroyed proliferate these weapons at will just because we have them.
who died and made you the "who-is-and-isn't-responsible" decision maker? so all mighty decision maker, when do you expect us to take over N.Korea?


in response to me asking if we should take over the rest of the world and force our views on everyone else, you said:

NO we shouldnt and we arent.
but you just contradicted that wit the previous quote, be saying IRAQ isn't a responsible country. the UN didn't feel that way, but good ol' bush decided to take it upon himself and go to war anyway.


nosey ass neighbors like me dont want to see our friends and family destroyed in mass numbers because we refused to fight some1 is out to destroy us.
so. we destroyed the friends and families of others not only by the sanctions placed on iraq but by the last war. or did you think only military personnel was affected by the war in iraq?


what if we felt the same way and left Hitler alone, and he got the bomb, do you know what our country would look like right now???
it would look like how our country looks and operates today, just a little more obvious.


i would disagree to a certain extent. and this is why, i feel that for Osama to pull off something that big he needed the help of some kind of government agency...
you're right. some gov. agency like the CIA. there is no way 4 planes could've been hijacked and crashed within hours in this day and age especially wit technology that has been around since the 70's where commercial planes can be controlled from the ground and override cockpit controls. i totally agree wit you here.


and we have accomplished alote as we have either captured/killed two thirds of AllQaeda senior members.
you watch too much tv if you think you can stop alqeada. yeah a lot of people have been captured. so what. do you know how many new kids/guys are being constantly trained/recruited since you even heard about alqeada? plus since 9/11 i'm sure that number has improved.


are you trying to tell me the people of Iraq loved Sadam Hussein??
i'm sure not all do, but he does have supporters. sounds crazy huh? just think maybe everything our gov tells us isn't true. did you know just about every war in history has been won by propaganda? so just hypothetically speaking, if this war had any propaganda, what do you think it would be? just hypothetically speaking....


i know we didnt. he rose to power within the Bathe Party same way hitler did in the Nazi party
yeah he did. in the 80's though, the US supplied him with military technology and intelligence. so we basically trained him, which is funny why we can't find him now. we also supplied him with biological weapons, AND supported his regime. we made him who he his. jus like we did wit Bin Laden. isn't that something?


the people of Iraq have you not heard in the news about what the US appointed Iraq National Congress is doing right now??? they are drafting up a constiution by which the country will follow, where the Iraqi people will be in change of their own destiny.
no, i haven't heard this. so you mean to tell me we're just gonna let them control themselves wit no leader?
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
Mcleanhatch said:
i would disagree to a certain extent. and this is why, i feel that for Osama to pull off something that big he needed the help of some kind of government agency like
Iraq: look up Salman Pak on google
Saudi Arabia: how many of the 9-11 hijackers were from SA

you and salma Pak, you following what the Exile said, and the same person Bush followed to wage war on iraq without any intelligents.

the only reason u say that is to defend the fact that you support the war, WITHOUT ANY EVIDENTS that IRAQ was INVOLVED.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
UKantCMe said:


and if he is such a threat, i think being personally attacked and invaded would be a good reason to let them bad boys loose. don't you?
Like I said before, he had an air force with fighter jets that he did not use but instead buried under dirt hoping we wouldn't find them. We did find them a couple months after the invasion. So why didn't he use his jets? Because he buried them and did not use them does not mean he did not have them. The chemical weapons are probably buried somewhere.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
UKantCMe said:
no, but we should respect them.
ya, respect al-qaeda. gimmi a break

UKantCMe said:
but you just contradicted that wit the previous quote, be saying IRAQ isn't a responsible country. the UN didn't feel that way, but good ol' bush decided to take it upon himself and go to war anyway.
the UN would have OK'ed it, France and Germany threatened a veto. it could have been 14-2 but with 2 vetos it cant pass.

bush didnt take it upon himself. a coalition of about 20 countries supported us.

UKantCMe said:
i'm sure not all do, but he does have supporters. sounds crazy huh?
no it doesnt sound crazy, i believe he does have supporters, there are alote of loyal supporters that happen to be bathists that know there is no place for them in a new and free iraq, just as the few powerful Nazi that were alive after WWII knew there was no future for them in Germany

UKantCMe said:
yeah he did. in the 80's though, the US supplied him with military technology and intelligence.
in our opposition to Iraq ya we did support the lesser of 2 evils

UKantCMe said:
we made him who he his. jus like we did wit Bin Laden. isn't that something?
we never supported Bin Laden, just because he was a small part of a resistance movement against the communist Soviets doesnt mean we supported him. ya we supported the mujahadeen, but not Bin Laden

UKantCMe said:
no, i haven't heard this. so you mean to tell me we're just gonna let them control themselves wit no leader?
right now the Iraqi National Congress is in control but within 6 months they will ahve a constitution ready at which time they will step down to whoever is voted in by the people of Iraq
 
Apr 11, 2003
1,575
0
0
gooeygraphics.com
look what i found...

PoeticChocolate said:
These are some interesting facts that my homeboys sent me...maybe it will enlighten some of you....
1. Q: What percentage of the world's population does the U.S. have?
A: 6%

2. Q: What percentage of the world's wealth does the U.S. have?
A: 50%

3. Q: Which country has the largest oil reserves?
A: Saudi Arabia

4. Q: Which country has the second largest oil reserves?
A: Iraq

5. Q: How much is spent on military budgets a year worldwide?
A: $900+ billion

6. Q: How much of this is spent by the U.S.?
A: 50%

7. Q: What percent of US military spending would ensure the essentials of life to everyone in the world, according the UN?
A: 10% (that's about $40 billion, the amount of funding initially requested to fund our retaliatory attack on Afghanistan).

8. Q: How many people have died in wars since World War II?
A: 86 million

9. Q: How long has Iraq had chemical and biological weapons?
A: Since the early 1980's.

10. Q: Did Iraq develop these chemical & biological weapons on their own?
A: No, the materials and technology were supplied by the US government, along with Britain and private corporations.

11. Q: Did the US government condemn the Iraqi use of gas warfare against Iran?
A: No

12. Q: How many people did Saddam Hussein kill using gas in the Kurdish town of Halabja in 1988?
A: 5,000

13. Q: How many western countries condemned this action at the time?
A: 0

14. Q: How many gallons of agent Orange did America use in Vietnam?
A: 17 million.

15. Q: Are there any proven links between Iraq and September 11th terrorist attack?
A: No

16. Q: What is the estimated number of civilian casualties in the Gulf War?
A: 35,000

17. Q: How many casualties did the Iraqi military inflict on the western forces during the Gulf War ?
A: 0

18. Q: How many retreating Iraqi soldiers were buried alive by U.S. tanks with ploughs mounted on the front?
A: 6,000

19. Q: How many tons of depleted uranium were left in Iraq and Kuwait after the Gulf War?
A: 40 tons

20. Q: What according to the UN was the increase in cancer rates in Iraq between 1991 and 1994?
A: 700%

21. Q: How much of Iraq's military capacity did America claim it had destroyed in 1991?
A: 80%

22. Q: Is there any proof that Iraq plans to use its weapons for anything other than deterrence and self defense?
A: No

23. Q: Does Iraq present more of a threat to world peace now than 10 years ago?
A: No

24. Q: How many civilian deaths has the Pentagon predicted in the event of an attack on Iraq in 2002/3?
A: 10,000

25. Q: What percentage of these will be children?
A: Over 50%

26. Q: How many years has the U.S. engaged in air strikes on Iraq?
A: 11 years

27. Q: Was the U.S and the UK at war with Iraq between December 1998 and September 1999?
A: No

28. Q: How many pounds of explosives were dropped on Iraq between December 1998 and September 1999?
A: 20 million

29. Q: How many years ago was UN Resolution 661 introduced, imposing strict sanctions on Iraq's imports and exports?
A: 12 years

30. Q: What was the child death rate in Iraq in 1989 (per 1,000 births)?
A: 38

31. Q: What was the estimated child death rate in Iraq in 1999 (per 1,000 births)?
A: 131 (that's an increase of 345%)

32. Q: How many Iraqis are estimated to have died by October 1999 as a result of UN sanctions?
A: 1.5 million

33. Q: How many Iraqi children are estimated to have died due to sanctions since 1997?
A: 750,000

34. Q: Did Saddam order the inspectors out of Iraq?
A: No

35. Q: How many inspections were there in November and December 1998?
A: 300

36. Q: How many of these inspections had problems?
A: 5

37. Q: Were the weapons inspectors allowed entry to the Ba'ath Party HQ?
A: Yes

38. Q: Who said that by December 1998, "Iraq had in fact, been disarmed to a level unprecedented in modern history."
A: Scott Ritter, UNSCOM chief.

39. Q: In 1998 how much of Iraq's post 1991 capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction did the UN weapons inspectors claim to have discovered and dismantled?
A: 90%

40. Q: Is Iraq willing to allow the weapons inspectors back in?
A: Yes

41. Q: How many UN resolutions did Israel violate by 1992?
A: Over 65

42. Q: How many UN resolutions on Israel did America veto between 1972 and 1990?
A: 30+

44. Q: How many countries are known to have nuclear weapons?
A: 8

45. Q: How many nuclear warheads has Iraq got?
A: 0

46. Q: How many nuclear warheads has US got?
A: over 10,000

47. Q: Which is the only country to use nuclear weapons?
A: the US

48. Q: How many nuclear warheads does Israel have?
A: Over 400

50. Q: Who said, "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"?
A: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
poetic chocolate said:
7. Q: What percent of US military spending would ensure the essentials of life to everyone in the world, according the UN?
A: 10% (that's about $40 billion, the amount of funding initially requested to fund our retaliatory attack on Afghanistan).
we cant even do that for our own population with a 7 trillion dollar budget, how can you seriously believe that the UN can do it for the entire world with 40 billion??

UKantCMe said:
so based on your whole "threat" thing... if these Q's & A's are true, than we are just as guilty...
about half of those are bullshit
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
Re: ukantcme

grav said:
so what are you trying to say? What are your thoughts on all these facts? You double checked all these facts right, since your accussing the US of being "just as guilty".

US is the leading terrorist state
 
May 16, 2002
454
2
0
40
MrFedEx503 said:
fuck all u bush haters i cant stnad yall mothat fuckers u hate but yall know u woulndt want to live anywhere else cuz the US is the tightest and we have fucking freedom, u dont like what were doing go live in a country in the middle east. then we will see how ya like living?
IT'S NOT A LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT, IT'S A CHANGE IT OR LOSE IT

America has still got the god damn death penalty goddamnit, please give me the name of a civilized country that sentence people to death and tell me there's nothing exceptionally fucked up in this land of the free.

Countries which retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes

AFGHANISTAN, ALGERIA, ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA, BAHAMAS, BAHRAIN, BANGLADESH, BARBADOS, BELARUS, BELIZE, BENIN, BOTSWANA, BURUNDI, CAMEROON, CHAD, CHINA, COMOROS, CONGO (Democratic Republic), CUBA, DOMINICA, EGYPT, EQUATORIAL GUINEA, ERITREA, ETHIOPIA, GABON, GHANA, GUATEMALA, GUINEA, GUYANA, INDIA, INDONESIA, IRAN, IRAQ, JAMAICA, JAPAN, JORDAN, KAZAKSTAN, KENYA, KOREA (North), KOREA (South), KUWAIT, KYRGYZSTAN, LAOS, LEBANON, LESOTHO, LIBERIA, LIBYA, MALAWI, MALAYSIA, MAURITANIA, MONGOLIA, MOROCCO, MYANMAR, NIGERIA, OMAN, PAKISTAN, PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, PHILIPPINES, QATAR, RWANDA, SAINT CHRISTOPHER & NEVIS, SAINT LUCIA, SAINT VINCENT & GRENADINES, SAUDI ARABIA, SIERRA LEONE, SINGAPORE, SOMALIA, SUDAN, SWAZILAND, SYRIA, TAIWAN, TAJIKISTAN, TANZANIA, THAILAND, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, TUNISIA, UGANDA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UZBEKISTAN, VIET NAM, YEMEN, ZAMBIA, ZIMBABWE