You can't post the article because it has figures in it? LMAO! You're used to posting images, so why don't you do a Ctrl + PrtScn to post it? Also, your summary is lacking and most likely doesn't cover what may actually be presented in the article, so I'll wait for you to post the images, thanks.
You're very uncharasmatic, do not understand sarcasm, and sound like a robot. He quoted me and my percentage, talked about co-signing and I explained what that percentage actually represents, "It isn't a fallacy when
I'm making light of your claims that others are co-signing." Get your reading skills up to snuff next time.
There is
NO SUCH THING as "the Asian religion", and since everyone here besides you knows this to be a
FACT, I agree with your claim that "the Asian religion" doesn't impose any form of birth control. :dead:
In this thread, and other threads, your main concern has been with religion and how you think religion has played a role in this. Yet when issues directly linked to a certain group of people are raised, you ignore this. Refer to pages 2 and 3 for proof of your antics.
This is your
opinion. I am fine with you passing it off as your opinion, you have a right to your opinion, but don't try to pass it off as
fact because it isn't. The same way you say we need to get rid of religion, someone else can say get rid of whites and Europeans, because they have caused the most destruction on the planet. Would getting rid of them be the right thing to do?
First off, not all religions promote the view that we are a special creation or important. Secondly, you are a prime example of the Dunning-Kruger Syndrome, especially when it comes to the thing you despise most--religion. Finally,
WHITE PRIVILEGE, has caused more problems within our last century than religion, but how come you never mention this?
And?
Yes, it says "be fruitful and multiply", but how is this any different from your own body sending signals to do the same thing?
Moreover, it also says don't have children out of wedlock, and if you didn't know, this is a contributor to population growth. It also says to keep the family together, and if you didn't know, studies show teens who have a connection with their parents or grew up with both parents in their home are less likely to experience teen pregnancy.
It matters when you make blanket statements and sweeping generalizations.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/27/catholics-to-pope-lift-bi_n_115185.html
And of course you can refer to the links in other threads where I showed you many "christians" endorse birth control.
What does logistic growth suggest? You're talking about growth, loss of resources, "K", etc, yet you don't even consider logistic growth and how the curve may change due to other factors.
Fail again. :dead:
What fallacy? Please stop using words out of context.
Your little model does not take into account logistic growth which actually considers environmental factors. Moreover, what your little model does not take into account is that in third world countries where
EDUCATION and
EMPLOYMENT are
GROWING, fertility rates are actually
DECREASING.
Science has had it's hand in fucking up the planet, and to deny this is pure foolishness. Me spending my time explaining it to you is laughable, so I ask that you read the comments provided by Ethereal (another thread.)
