As opposed to you co-signing for him 99.9% of the time and looking just as foolish as he does? His shenanigans have kept this thread OFF TOPIC, and of course I would expect you to find bottle spinning "interesting"....whatever the fuck that is.
Fail again.
I would be willing to bet that I co-sign with ThaG no where near 99.9% of the time.
I have disagreed with ThaG many times, particularity in discussions relating to economics, psychology, evolutionary psychology, sociology, and our respective understandings of human nature. Just because I have agreed with him in this particular thread, and in some other recent discussions, is not evidence that I agree with him 99.9% of the time.
As much as you seem to take issue with perceptions purported as facts, I am surprised you would allow yourself to commit such a fallacy as assuming I co-sign with ThaG 99.9% of the time and suggesting that I look at foolish as he does.
Do you find it at all ironic or worthy of introspection that you are seemingly upset with, and accusing ThaG of something that is similar to what other people have suggested you have done as well?