Wkileaks

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
MrDiamondFDC

MrDiamondFDC

#REVOLUTION
#81
Apr 30, 2008
3,505
176
63
41
hatemachine.us
#81
iaoish said:
If these annunaki created us, that pretty much contradicts the Hebrew bible.
Or you don't agree?
Click to expand...
Yes, but I don't believe it.

Jim_beam said:
Don't let the haters get you down MrDiamond, governments always tells the truth, they want us all to live long and prosper, they will take care of everything so that you don't have to think for yourself... Everything will be fine
Click to expand...
I got no problem with whistle blowers if the info serves a public good. The way Assange is doing it is all wrong.
 
MrDiamondFDC

MrDiamondFDC

#REVOLUTION
#86
Apr 30, 2008
3,505
176
63
41
hatemachine.us
#86
He would have been given asylum and protected under the WBC to release anything that wasn't treasonous to America or in direct conflict of national security.

Now give me conspiracy shit about how he would end up dead. That's the risk of fighting the power.
 
KillaKali

KillaKali

\|/
#87
Apr 18, 2005
2,608
29
0
#87
I'm skeptical, just as I would about anything that arises within the mainstream media. I've learned by observation & experience that there's nothing that gets past the airwaves if there hasnt been enough fabrications to help mold the conflict with plenty of twists & turns to completely throw off the masses of people following. Thuogh they may be toying with the idea of "leaking" truths that we all know need to unravel, this seems to be like another play in the making. It's more of a conflict that further gets juicier within time about how the owner of wikileaks is in jail,etc. I do agree this will have interesting effects that we do not see with this situation alone. Looks like they will tie this into "extremists" that are "anti government" in the long future.
 
M

Miro

Sicc OG
#88
Sep 20, 2006
195
4
0
74
#88
HERESY said:
Does anyone see this leading to more severe forms of internet regulation?
Click to expand...

the DNS company that provided "wikileaks.org" has stated that if they keep wikileaks.org online it would will result in affecting the rest of its customers becuase of the attacks, and this is against their policy, so it drop that domain from resolving. Also i believe wikileaks hosting company dropped them for the same reason they could not handle the attacks.

Amazon, paypal, visa, mastercard have stated something along the lines of illegal activities, again against there policy. So amazon doesnt host wikileaks, and the paypal visa mastercard have stopped their services to wikileaks.

Now why are all these companies behaving this way? is it US gov pressure? or do these companies have legit concerns? are these the type of "internet regulations" you are talking about it? becuase if it is, it's already there.

NOw on the bright side, we still have the ability to connect online and connect to whatever servers and get whatever information we want, be it websites, file sharing, media streaming, etc. This ability is currently being fought for in the US, and the FCC is going to be setting up the rules for this very soon. I really do hope it heavily is based on "net neutrality" becuase without it we're really screwed in regards to freedom of speech. http://www.savetheinternet.com/net-neutrality-101

oh and also this ability currently also leans more to corporate control, than gov. Comcast has won in court earlier this year that they have the right to regulate traffic their internet traffic on their network. So far Comcast only slows file sharing traffic but if the net neutrality rules aren't set by the gov who knows what else they'll do.
 
Lordbyron

Lordbyron

Sicc OG
#89
Oct 6, 2005
1,497
4
0
44
#89
HERESY said:
Does anyone see this leading to more severe forms of internet regulation?
Click to expand...
That's a good question... Law makers will prolly try to force some bullsh*t regulations... But honestly they seem to outta touch to fully understand the internets... Kinda like how the record industry tried its hardest to shut down Napster... They won... But were to stupid to understand the future of music was headed in that direction... The result... I can download any album I want in 5 mins, for free...
 
NAMO

NAMO

Sicc OG
#91
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
44
#91
HERESY said:
Does anyone see this leading to more severe forms of internet regulation?
Click to expand...
Lordbyron said:
That's a good question... Law makers will prolly try to force some bullsh*t regulations... But honestly they seem to outta touch to fully understand the internets... Kinda like how the record industry tried its hardest to shut down Napster... They won... But were to stupid to understand the future of music was headed in that direction... The result... I can download any album I want in 5 mins, for free...
Click to expand...
This is their final frontier, the only thing they cannot control. It really doesn't suprise me if this is the case.
 
MrDiamondFDC

MrDiamondFDC

#REVOLUTION
#92
Apr 30, 2008
3,505
176
63
41
hatemachine.us
#92
SteadyMobbin said:
I dont really care about the owner of wikileaks at this point. What exactly is in those documents?
Click to expand...
All kinds of shit. Some stuff that can set off a bad chain reaction in the Middle East and that's what I worry about. Like Saudi Arabia supporting an American attack on Iran and shit that involves Saudi and Egyptian money. There is also stuff that could lead to a confrontation between Pakistan and India, both being nuclear powers. The list goes on and on.
 
Roz

Roz

Sicc OG
#93
Jul 22, 2009
2,874
116
0
39
www.facebook.com
#93
OutcastedOutlaw said:
This is their final frontier, the only thing they cannot control. It really doesn't suprise me if this is the case.
Click to expand...

I've thought this for about a week now, and the pieces have slowly come together. I've have been laughed at by friends and people online for even mentioning it. I really hope it's not the case.
 
B

BENNY_BLANCO1

Sicc OG
#94
Aug 19, 2004
391
77
0
#94
Unknown Poet said:
I think we need more hackers like him out there doing good.

It was the work of hackers that exposed the whole global warming scam...
and prevented the new world order from gaining more power.
Not all hackers are bad.. just the destructive ones who destroy websites..
Click to expand...
How would you feel if it were your emails being hacked, or similar situations involving invasion of privacy?
 
NAMO

NAMO

Sicc OG
#95
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
44
#95
Roz said:
I've thought this for about a week now, and the pieces have slowly come together. I've have been laughed at by friends and people online for even mentioning it. I really hope it's not the case.
Click to expand...
we will see how it all pans out, might be too late by then though.
 
M

Miro

Sicc OG
#96
Sep 20, 2006
195
4
0
74
#96
Dear friends,


The chilling intimidation campaign against WikiLeaks (when they have broken no laws) is an attack on freedom of the press and democracy. We urgently need a massive public outcry to stop the crackdown -- let's get to 1 million voices and take out full page ads in US newspapers this week!

Sign the petition


The massive campaign of intimidation against WikiLeaks is sending a chill through free press advocates everywhere.

Legal experts say WikiLeaks has likely broken no laws. Yet top US politicians have called it a terrorist group and commentators have urged assassination of its staff. The organization has come under massive government and corporate attack, but WikiLeaks is only publishing information provided by a whistleblower. And it has partnered with the world's leading newspapers (NYT, Guardian, Spiegel etc) to carefully vet the information it publishes.

The massive extra-judicial intimidation of WikiLeaks is an attack on democracy. We urgently need a public outcry for freedom of the press and expression. Sign the petition to stop the crackdown and forward this email to everyone -- let's get to 1 million voices and take out full page ads in US newspapers this week!

http://www.avaaz.org/en/wikileaks_petition/?vl

WikiLeaks isn't acting alone -- it's partnered with the top newspapers in the world (New York Times, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, etc) to carefully review 250,000 US diplomatic cables and remove any information that it is irresponsible to publish. Only 800 cables have been published so far. Past WikiLeaks publications have exposed government-backed torture, the murder of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, and corporate corruption.

The US government is currently pursuing all legal avenues to stop WikiLeaks from publishing more cables, but the laws of democracies protect freedom of the press. The US and other governments may not like the laws that protect our freedom of expression, but that's exactly why it's so important that we have them, and why only a democratic process can change them.

Reasonable people can disagree on whether WikiLeaks and the leading newspapers it's partnered with are releasing more information than the public should see. Whether the releases undermine diplomatic confidentiality and whether that's a good thing. Whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has the personal character of a hero or a villain. But none of this justifies a vicious campaign of intimidation to silence a legal media outlet by governments and corporations. Click below to join the call to stop the crackdown:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/wikileaks_petition/?vl

Ever wonder why the media so rarely gives the full story of what happens behind the scenes? This is why - because when they do, governments can be vicious in their response. And when that happens, it's up to the public to stand up for our democratic rights to a free press and freedom of expression. Never has there been a more vital time for us to do so.

With hope,
Ricken, Emma, Alex, Alice, Maria Paz and the rest of the Avaaz team.

SOURCES:

Law experts say WikiLeaks in the clear (ABC)
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s3086781.htm

WikiLeaks are a bunch of terrorists, says leading U.S. congressman (Mail Online)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-says-leading-US-congressman-Peter-King.html

Cyber guerrillas can help US (Financial Times)
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d3dd7c40-ff15-11df-956b-00144feab49a.html#axzz17QvQ4Ht5

Amazon drops WikiLeaks under political pressure (Yahoo)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101201/tc_afp/usdiplomacyinternetwikileakscongressamazon

"WikiLeaks avenged by hacktivists" (PC World):
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscent...payback_wikileaks_avenged_by_hacktivists.html

US Gov shows true control over Internet with WikiLeaks containment (Tippett.org)
http://www.tippett.org/2010/12/us-gov-shows-true-control-over-internet-with-wikileaks-containment/

US embassy cables culprit should be executed, says Mike Huckabee (The Guardian)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/01/us-embassy-cables-executed-mike-huckabee

WikiLeaks ditched by MasterCard, Visa. Who's next? (The Christian Science Monitor)
http://www.csmonitor.com/Innovation...iLeaks-ditched-by-MasterCard-Visa.-Who-s-next

Assange's Interpol Warrant Is for Having Sex Without a Condom (The Slatest)
http://slatest.slate.com/id/2276690/


Support the Avaaz community! We're entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way -- donate here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom