U.S. most dangerous cities(It's all bad)

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#26
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#26
you know its all bad in the bay when richmond and oakland are in the top 10 and Richmond is a smaller version of Oakland pretty much
 
Young Lou

Young Lou

Sicc OG
#27
Apr 25, 2002
5,638
1,615
113
45
#27
TM1 said:
Why is this posted here?
Click to expand...
It's relevant because when we talk about music (bay, l.a., det. ny, etc...) and reasons why sales are down, hating is high, and attitudes are sh*tty then you can see statistics (maybe a little skewed) to back up these reasons why it's getting harder and harder in this music business.
 
K

king of the O

Sicc OG
#30
Feb 27, 2006
294
1
0
40
#30
Wow this makes no sense.if this was even because there are 50 states each state should produce the average of 7 cities each. But its crazy that California has produced 50 of the nations 371 most dangerous cities and about 1s are in the bay alone! What the fuck is wrong with cali!!!!!
 
W

WHITE DEVIL

Sicc OG
#33
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#33
king of the O said:
Wow this makes no sense.if this was even because there are 50 states each state should produce the average of 7 cities each. But its crazy that California has produced 50 of the nations 371 most dangerous cities and about 1s are in the bay alone! What the fuck is wrong with cali!!!!!
Click to expand...
Step your logic game up

Different states have varying (not even) population numbers and the number of large 75k+ population cities is also not even

In addition,
California pop = 36 mil
USA pop = 301 mil

CA = 12% of the US population
At 50/378, CA accounts for 13.2% of the 371 US cities with populations exceeding 75k people

Assuming the '50' figure is right (I didnt count)...

Not very significant at all
 
ArGenTin3

ArGenTin3

Sicc OG
#36
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#36
the midwest has 10 of the top 25 worst cities...

and only 4 of the safest cities in the top 25.

7 cities in Ohio alone are in the worst top 50...thats crazy....Ohio is a pretty small state.
 
Nonstop

Nonstop

Sicc OG
#37
May 6, 2002
2,969
1,111
113
42
nonstop.bandcamp.com
#37
i got a spot in st louis and atlanta.. but honestly i dont see any difference city to city.. theres good parts and bad parts to erry city. all this shit is done per capita, so if you got a city with 100,000 people and 11 murders, it will be ranked worse then a city with 1,000,000 people and 100 murders.. these stats are generally misleading
 
drewski.kalonji

drewski.kalonji

Shark Finning & Grinning
#38
May 17, 2002
5,083
344
0
38
Murky Bay Waters, CA
#38
WHITE DEVIL said:
Step your logic game up

Different states have varying (not even) population numbers and the number of large 75k+ population cities is also not even

In addition,
California pop = 36 mil
USA pop = 301 mil

CA = 12% of the US population
At 50/378, CA accounts for 13.2% of the 371 US cities with populations exceeding 75k people

Assuming the '50' figure is right (I didnt count)...

Not very significant at all
Click to expand...
HAHAHA good shit some people need to use simple logic a little more.

On another tip my girlfriend is from Detroit so I know how the D gets. Nathen but love for Detroit though. But off top midwestern towns like Gary, Flint, St. Louis, chicago and many more got too many problems. I grew up around Michigan and seen what the sad ish is like.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom