The 2006 Siccness NBA MVP Voting Ballot

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who is your 2006 MVP?

  • Total voters
    61
F

Fucky McFuckerson

Sicc OG
#81
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#81
Tony said:
I never said they have 5 stars on their team... I said Nash is surrounded by talented 3 point shooters which makes his job easier. You're giving Nash way too much credit talking about Nash makes them better. Nash can ball don't get me wrong. He does get them open looks... but stop taking away the fact that these cats can shoot. He's surrounded like I said!
Click to expand...
You still dont get it...and im sorry for that...

Nash MADE the Suns....who were the Suns before Nash got their the SECOND TIME AROUND???Nobodies....EXACTLY....

Oh wow...i just WON this arguement....thanks FOR PLAYING!!!
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#82
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#82
Naaaaa you didn't win my friend. If Nash is so good then why is Dallas still contending without him?

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060414

Question No. 3: If you replaced every MVP candidate with a decent player at their position for the entire season, what would be the effect on their teams' records?

Answer: If you replaced Kobe with a decent 2-guard (someone like Jamal Crawford) for the entire 2005-06 Lakers season, they would have won between 15 and 20 games. I can say that in complete confidence. Terrible team. When Smush Parker and Kwame Brown are your third- and fourth-best players, you shouldn't even be allowed to watch the playoffs on TV. Throw Kobe in the mix and they're headed for 45 wins. So he's been worth 25 victories for them. Minimum.

Steve Nash
Kudos to him for increasing his scoring and seamlessly integrating seven new teammates into Phoenix's offense; in many ways, he was better than last season. He's the only current player whose unselfishness seems to transfer (almost by osmosis) to everyone else on his team. On the flip side, he's even worse defensively than last season; just in the past two months, I watched Shaun Livingston, Delonte West and Kidd completely outplay him in separate games, capped off by Billups simply CREMATING him in Detroit two Sundays ago. Would an MVP ever get decimated like that by someone who plays the same position? Please.

Put it this way: Nash was a cute choice last season, mainly because none of the other candidates stood out, and I could see why someone would have been swayed. (It was like ordering one of those fancy foreign beers at a bar, the ones in the heavy green bottles with the 13-letter name that you can't pronounce, only someone else is drinking it, so you say to yourself, "Ah, screw it, I'm tired of the beer I always drink, lemme try one of those.") But this year? I'm not saying he should be ignored, but if you actually end up picking him, either you're not watching enough basketball or you just want to see a white guy win back-to-back MVP's.

LOL... just read the atricle. It's all true. You lose!!
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#85
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#85
herm96 said:
mavs are even better without nash
Click to expand...
2001-02 (with Nash) 57-25
2002-03 (with Nash) 60-22
2003-04 (with Nash) 52-30
2004-05 (1st seaon without Nash) 58-24
Now they're currently 59-21 (without Nash)....
 
L

LaKeRzz8

Banned
#86
May 27, 2002
2,804
0
0
www.google.com
#86
Oh Coy!Ocerto said:
You still dont get it...and im sorry for that...

Nash MADE the Suns....who were the Suns before Nash got their the SECOND TIME AROUND???Nobodies....EXACTLY....

Oh wow...i just WON this arguement....thanks FOR PLAYING!!!
Click to expand...
Look at it this way. For most of the season Kwame Brown couldn't even catch the basketball, so if he was on the Suns instead of the Lakers, and Nash would have passed to him and Kwame would have bobbled it and lost it that wouldn't count as an assist. If he caught it wide open from 10 feet away, no guarentee he would make ths shot. Now, not taking anything from Nash, but like Tony kept saying, the players hit their shots and thats what leads to the assists. So good job for Nash to find them, more important for the players to sink them. Something the Lakers players have trouble doing.
 
W

WestRumble

Sicc OG
#87
Mar 2, 2004
801
0
0
#87
who is raja bell??

raja bell was scoring double digits with utah before he came over to phoenix and was playing less minutes. raja bell been solid. nash will probably get credited for that as well lol..
 
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#88
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#88
ANYBODY WHO THINKS KOBE DOESNT DESERVE IT JUST DONT LIKE HIM AND ARE BIASED, WHEN ANYONE PERFORMS LIKE HE HAS ITS AN AUTOMATIC MVP, NO SHAQ SO THERES REALLY NO EXCUSE FOR HIM NOT TO GET IT, THINK OF IT THIS WAY I SEE EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT NASH AND WHAT ARE THE SUNS WITHOUT HIM, WHAT ARE THE LAKERZ WITHOUT KOBE???
 
eff suckaz

eff suckaz

Sicc OG
#93
Nov 6, 2004
2,539
1
0
44
#93
BAMMER said:
He blew his MVP shot by missing a couple games?lol
Click to expand...
exactly.

he should win for the fact that he carried the team w/o their 2nd best player (larry hughes) damn near all year and they are around 15 games over .500. and they didnt even make the playoffs last year. he is averaging 31.6 pts, 7.1 rebounds and 6.6 assists per game. he deserves the MVP no question.
 
eff suckaz

eff suckaz

Sicc OG
#94
Nov 6, 2004
2,539
1
0
44
#94
here is a few more of his stats this year:

Ranks #3 in the NBA in Points Per Game(31.6)
Ranks #12 in the NBA in Assists Per Game(6.6)
Ranks #16 in the NBA in Steals Per Game(1.56)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Minutes Per Game(42.7)
Ranks #1 in the NBA in Minutes Played(3331.0)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Field Goals Made(867.0)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Field Goal Attempts(1807.0)
Ranks #16 in the NBA in Three-Point Field Goal Attempts(379.0)
Ranks #6 in the NBA in Free Throws(600.0)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Free Throw Attempts(812.0)
Ranks #19 in the NBA in Defensive Rebounds(476.0)
Ranks #10 in the NBA in Assists(517.0)
Ranks #14 in the NBA in Steals(122.0)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Points(2461.0)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Triple-doubles(5.0)
Ranks #3 in the NBA in Field Goals Per 48 Minutes(12.49)
Ranks #3 in the NBA in Field-Goal Attempts Per 48 Minutes(26.04)
Ranks #7 in the NBA in Free Throws Per 48 Minutes(8.65)
Ranks #6 in the NBA in Free Throw Attempts Per 48 Minutes(11.7)
Ranks #3 in the NBA in Points Per 48 Minutes(35.5)
Ranks #6 in the NBA in Total Turnovers(257.0)
Ranks #1 in the NBA in Total Efficiency Points(2307.0)
Ranks #2 in the NBA in Efficiency Ranking(29.58)
Ranks #7 in the NBA in Efficiency Ranking Per 48 Minutes(33.24)
Ranks #6 in the NBA in Turnovers Per Game(3.29)
Ranks #18 in the NBA in Turnovers Per 48 Minutes(3.7)
 
I. Cold

I. Cold

Sicc OG
#98
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
42
#98
whoever said nash is worse defensively this year than last has no idea what they're talkin about. nash has stepped up his D ten fold this season. ask somebody
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom