SADDAM CAPTURED...MUG SHOT
- Thread starter WiCkEd
- Start date
Because most of them are dead.
1. Saddam was not a tryant, war criminal, or a butcher when he was put into power. In fact, I have posted an article where he was commended for his good education system during his early years in office. Whether we put him into power or not, he was not a criminal.
2. "WE" did not put him into office, "THEY" put him in office. I didn't know Bush was president in 1980, this is news to me. Can we still hold germany accountable for Hitler's actions? No, thats unfair, but anything the U.S. did in the past is completely relevant in our present day issues, right?
3. When trying to find where things went wrong, and after looking over your statement about him not wanting to be our puppet anymore, I have come to the conclusion it was either that, or the: Children he killed; Women he raped; Thousands of murders that have been commited under his command; Stripping of a human free will and speech; Invasion of other countries based on oil (with full admittance); Severe torture; just to name a very small amount.
Read up on this for more information:
http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82158
1. Saddam was not a tryant, war criminal, or a butcher when he was put into power. In fact, I have posted an article where he was commended for his good education system during his early years in office. Whether we put him into power or not, he was not a criminal.
2. "WE" did not put him into office, "THEY" put him in office. I didn't know Bush was president in 1980, this is news to me. Can we still hold germany accountable for Hitler's actions? No, thats unfair, but anything the U.S. did in the past is completely relevant in our present day issues, right?
3. When trying to find where things went wrong, and after looking over your statement about him not wanting to be our puppet anymore, I have come to the conclusion it was either that, or the: Children he killed; Women he raped; Thousands of murders that have been commited under his command; Stripping of a human free will and speech; Invasion of other countries based on oil (with full admittance); Severe torture; just to name a very small amount.
Read up on this for more information:
http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82158
Re: Where are all the commie bashers?
thats what I notice too, the only large crowds that were celebratings were the communist party of IRaq.
ColdBlooded said:
Interesting that in all of Iraq the only people the U.S. news could find to show on TV celebrating Sadam's capture were commies.
Big rally with lots of red flags.
Damn commies.
sources:
ABC news, CNN, AP
Big rally with lots of red flags.
Damn commies.
sources:
ABC news, CNN, AP
thats what I notice too, the only large crowds that were celebratings were the communist party of IRaq.
money. thats why. but that doesnt mean im going to let my country go down smoking. is that what you want? or feel should happen?
REGARDLESS OF OUR GOVERNMENT AND HOW CORRUPT THEY ARE THIS IS STILL OUR COUNTRY. CAPITALISM AND FREEDOM GO HAND IN HAND WITH THE WORD AMERICA. GET RID OF THOSE AND YOU MIGHT AS WELL RENAME THE COUNTRY.
REGARDLESS OF OUR GOVERNMENT AND HOW CORRUPT THEY ARE THIS IS STILL OUR COUNTRY. CAPITALISM AND FREEDOM GO HAND IN HAND WITH THE WORD AMERICA. GET RID OF THOSE AND YOU MIGHT AS WELL RENAME THE COUNTRY.
Would you like an example of a basic difference between Democrats and Republicans? Try this. Common sense and a third-grade intelligence level will tell you that some country out there is going to be the dominant military and political power in the world. This will be true until that sad day arrives when international sovereignty is a thing of the past and we are truly under the thumb of a one-world government. Someone is going to dominate. Some country is going to call the shots when the chips are down. Republicans (and some libertarians like myself) want that country to be the United States. Democrats don't. It's that simple.
this is from neal boortz. if this doesnt get it through your head nothing will.
you can interchange democrat with liberal, lefty, bootlicker, commie, panty waist tree hugger, race warlord, whatever you want. its all the same.
WHAT COUNTRY WOULD YOU PREFER TO DOMINATE BESIDES THE US??????
this is from neal boortz. if this doesnt get it through your head nothing will.
you can interchange democrat with liberal, lefty, bootlicker, commie, panty waist tree hugger, race warlord, whatever you want. its all the same.
WHAT COUNTRY WOULD YOU PREFER TO DOMINATE BESIDES THE US??????
I wasn't saying the communist party in Iraq is dead. I was saying that the people that would normally be celebrating--other than communists-- have parished.
Then why have you yet to address any ill feelings towards this man or his regime. You don't support America and you show plenty of dislike in these threads, why so one sided?
He didn't support Saddam's atrocities. He might have supported him for other reasons, but one must be a fool to believe that any U.S. president has ever supported the cold blooded killing of any Iraqi civilian the way Saddam did. Bush Senior is not president anymore, so we don't have to worry about that.
Then why have you yet to address any ill feelings towards this man or his regime. You don't support America and you show plenty of dislike in these threads, why so one sided?
He didn't support Saddam's atrocities. He might have supported him for other reasons, but one must be a fool to believe that any U.S. president has ever supported the cold blooded killing of any Iraqi civilian the way Saddam did. Bush Senior is not president anymore, so we don't have to worry about that.