NBA Finals: Celtics vs. Lakers

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Boston Celtics vs. LA Lakers


  • Total voters
    100

caff

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
17,965
259
83
48
#45
The Celtics did not have to go through the road that the Lakers had to go through. The Lakers beat thee 50+ win teams in pretty good fashion. I think there more than ready for the Celtics. The Celtics dont have that Killer in them like Kobe does. Fisher handled Iverson, J-Wills, and Tony Parker, so Rondo should be like going on vacation.
 

caff

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
17,965
259
83
48
#46
LOL @ niggas thinking this gonna be a series.

Kobe ain't gonna let scrubs like Paul Pierce and Ray Allen get in the way of his destiny. The boy is focused.

Lakers in 6.
 
Apr 14, 2003
6,415
154
63
38
#48
The thing about the Celtics is that they play solid team defense. We all know that they say about defense. But I don't know if that's gonna work out in this case.
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#49
How come you Laker fans keep forgetting that Boston owned the West this entire season, what makes you so sure the championship series is going to be any different?

Caff?

calling Pierce and Allen some scrubs is just ridiculous now, get serious man....lol
 
Jun 15, 2005
4,591
14
0
#51
This is the playoffs, the regular season is a different story.

case in point 1) Bos had the best road record in the NBA during the regular season, but how about their road record in the playoffs.

case in point 2) Bos owned Atlanta 3 out of 3 times during the regular season, then went to a game 7 in the first round.

Playoff are a different story, we're a different team then the last time they saw us.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#52
oh well, after the hawks series, the celts werent gonna beat the cavs. after the cavs series the celts definitely werent beating the pistons. all year its been about what the celtics wont be able to do. i aint sweatin. whats gonna be the excuse when boston wins the series? the eastern conference is easier? they had an easier road to get there? thats what some people were sayin. theyve done what theyve had to do all season. theyve done what people said they couldnt, including UTTER DOMINATION of the western conference. regular season or not the pessimist similarities are the same. ill take boston in 6 or 7.

i am worried about the 2 3 2 format though, it heavily favors l.a.
 
Jun 15, 2005
4,591
14
0
#54
does it sound like "i'm making excuses" or something?

I am merely responding to those of you who feel your accomplishments over LA or the West Conf during the regular season somehow dictate exactly what's going to happen.

Do I think the Lake show is just gonna run right over the Clets? NO. Do I think both teams have a genuine shot at winning this? YES.

There isn't gonna be any excuse from me if we lose this- you can bet on that.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#55
does it sound like "i'm making excuses" or something?

I am merely responding to those of you who feel your accomplishments over LA or the West Conf during the regular season somehow dictate exactly what's going to happen.

Do I think the Lake show is just gonna run right over the Clets? NO. Do I think both teams have a genuine shot at winning this? YES.

There isn't gonna be any excuse from me if we lose this- you can bet on that.
did someone say it sounded like you were making excuses? no.
 
Jun 15, 2005
4,591
14
0
#57
those tickets would cost an arm and a leg for real.

I went to a playoff game against the kings in like 2000 and it was $200 a pop to sit in the fucking nosebleed.
 
Jun 18, 2005
2,398
44
0
#58
CAN'T WAIT TILL THUR$.! LAKER$ IN 6 GAME$ I C BO$TON TAKING ONE IN L.A.! BUT LIKE IN THE $PUR$ $ERIE$ MY LAKER$ PROVED ME WRONG LET IT B $O AGAIN! GOIN BACK 2 THAT RIVALRY GOING 2 B OFF THE HOOK, THO!