Merged Thread: Uday and Qusay Hussein
- Thread starter Mcleanhatch
- Start date
Re: Re: HAS AMERICA COMMITED A CRIME AGAINST IRAQ?
what do you mean nobody is talking about this it has been all over the news since tuesday.
if they went in there raiding the house and shots were being fired then it was not assasination. assasination would only apply if they were caught and could have been safely brought to justice but werent.
i think it was first signed in by Nixon or Johnson.
Clinton was not the first.
he just kept it intact just like Bush41, Bush43, Reagan, Carter, Ford, and Nixon did
what do you mean nobody is talking about this it has been all over the news since tuesday.
if they went in there raiding the house and shots were being fired then it was not assasination. assasination would only apply if they were caught and could have been safely brought to justice but werent.
i think it was first signed in by Nixon or Johnson.
Clinton was not the first.
he just kept it intact just like Bush41, Bush43, Reagan, Carter, Ford, and Nixon did
^^^^
No what I meant is that no one's mentioned the fact that killing Sa'Dumbs kids was illegal.
My personal opinion?
Don't expect anyone to moarn for your ass when you die if you were a dick....
About the ban on political assissination, didn't Clinton put a hit on Osama Bin Laden? Or was it Sa'Dumb?
No what I meant is that no one's mentioned the fact that killing Sa'Dumbs kids was illegal.
My personal opinion?
Don't expect anyone to moarn for your ass when you die if you were a dick....
About the ban on political assissination, didn't Clinton put a hit on Osama Bin Laden? Or was it Sa'Dumb?
why was it illegal??? and ya they were sadams sons but the werent kids. they got intel that high ranking officials were hiding out there and they acted on it like they have several other times in the past couple of months.
they raided the home in Mosul and encounted resistance and engaged the enemy in a gun battle and came out on top. obviously they later found out that 2 of the men were uday and qusay
they raided the home in Mosul and encounted resistance and engaged the enemy in a gun battle and came out on top. obviously they later found out that 2 of the men were uday and qusay
@idiot logic if you throw a stone expect to get hit with a rock. ok junior?
@anathematics when I said his sons were innocent I did it for a reason. I wanted to see if logic, mcleanhatch or any other pro war patriots would comment. Well mcleanhatch did.
Anyway when IRAQ showed pictures of the americans it was said that they violated international law. I dont know if america has violated (any laws) by showing pictures of dead people.
@mclean...naw forget it.
im going to sit on this one for a minute.
@anathematics when I said his sons were innocent I did it for a reason. I wanted to see if logic, mcleanhatch or any other pro war patriots would comment. Well mcleanhatch did.
Anyway when IRAQ showed pictures of the americans it was said that they violated international law. I dont know if america has violated (any laws) by showing pictures of dead people.
@mclean...naw forget it.
im going to sit on this one for a minute.
NEW VIDEO OF SADDAMS SONS
IM PRETTY CONVINCED ITS THEM...WASNT TO SURE BEFORE, BUT AFTER SHAVED THE BEARDS AND CLEANED EM UP IT DOES APPEAR TO BE THEM....
ANYONE DISAGREE AND THINK THAT THE BROTHERS ARE PROBABLY SOMEWHERE, SIPPIN DRINKS UNDER PALM TREES WITH SOME FINE BITCHES POLISHING THEIR KNOBS? LOL
HOPEFULLY THEYRE DEAD....
IM PRETTY CONVINCED ITS THEM...WASNT TO SURE BEFORE, BUT AFTER SHAVED THE BEARDS AND CLEANED EM UP IT DOES APPEAR TO BE THEM....
ANYONE DISAGREE AND THINK THAT THE BROTHERS ARE PROBABLY SOMEWHERE, SIPPIN DRINKS UNDER PALM TREES WITH SOME FINE BITCHES POLISHING THEIR KNOBS? LOL
HOPEFULLY THEYRE DEAD....
LOL@using constitution. Our constitution requires a declaration of war that is voted on by the Congress. A president CANNOT make a declaration of war. Last time I checked, the congress never voted to declar war on Iraq, so acording to our constitution, we had no legal grounds to invade Iraq...................
@Heresy
That’s great, re: “innocent remark”, baiting is always an enjoyable game.
And yes, I believe there were grounds for accusing the Iraqi regime – at least the few that did it – for showing pictures of American soldiers on their media outfits. However, the Geneva Conventions only apply to treatment of POWs, and such…journalists snapping pictures aren’t subjected to such draconian laws of war.
The deaths of Uday and Qusay considered assassination? Not likely.
No legal grounds to be in Iraq? That’s an interesting argument.
Murders? Hmm, at least you are consistent.
That’s great, re: “innocent remark”, baiting is always an enjoyable game.
And yes, I believe there were grounds for accusing the Iraqi regime – at least the few that did it – for showing pictures of American soldiers on their media outfits. However, the Geneva Conventions only apply to treatment of POWs, and such…journalists snapping pictures aren’t subjected to such draconian laws of war.
The deaths of Uday and Qusay considered assassination? Not likely.
No legal grounds to be in Iraq? That’s an interesting argument.
Murders? Hmm, at least you are consistent.
@ snubnoze,
Congress authorized action in Iraq MONTHS before we engaged Iraq.
Where have you been?
http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa101102a.htm
Congress authorized action in Iraq MONTHS before we engaged Iraq.
Where have you been?
http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa101102a.htm