Merged Thread: Uday and Qusay Hussein

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 19, 2003
63
0
0
#41
2-0-Sixx said:


Would you like to explain why you think this or should I assume you are to brainless to do so?
LOL... well for one reason Mr. Dumbfuck look at your signature!

"They are the same old ones who wanted to have Muhammad Ali locked up for refusing to kill GOOKS. They speak for all that is cruel and stupid and vicious in the American character. They are the racists and hate mongers among us-they are the Ku Klux Klan. I piss down the throats of these Nazis.

HAHAHA

they are racists and hate mongers???? Who is the one calling Vietnamese people "GOOKS"??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

your an idiot.. accept it ( shakes head the rest of the night)




:eek:
 
Jul 10, 2003
27
0
0
#43
I personally don't see a problem with having Hunter Thompson in one's "signature" - any reason why some folks disagree with it? (Perhaps it's just some personal "beef" amongst people on this message board).

Also, it would be interesting to see where that quote came from...(Google, anyone?).
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#44
Nice articles you posted. Oh, you posted them in another forum too.

DOUBLEDOWN said:
"LOL... well for one reason Mr. Dumbfuck look at your signature!they are racists and hate mongers???? Who is the one calling Vietnamese people "GOOKS"??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????"

Nice try. Do you know who the man is I quoted?

The short quote is actually from a recent article the man wrote, which more then a PAGE is not shown in my sig. If you werent such a pea brain you would do some research before you make such comments.
Anywayz, just for the record, he uses the word "gook" after he explains that the word was commen for americans to call asians that term. The writer never called anyone "gook".
 
Jul 10, 2003
27
0
0
#46
Assassination (for political ends or otherwise) is technically illegal, according to Executive Order 1233 - which has been in effect since the Ford administration (I believe). However, like a few others mentioned, coalition (US) troops were “officially” under fire – easily justifying lethal force.

Was a crime committed against Iraq? You mean the country that is currently under US/UK joint administration? It would be interesting to see any court take up that case.

And, if you are interested, the chances of G.W. Bush (or anyone in the Bush administration) being charged with “war crimes” in this whole Iraq fiasco are nil - considering war crimes against Bush the Elder (the infamous “Highway of Death”, etc.) are still pending from what I have heard (and Ramsey Clark doesn’t seem to be proceeding that quickly, or effectively).

War Crimes against Bush the Elder – Ramsey Clark
http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htm
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#47
anathematics said:
Assassination (for political ends or otherwise) is technically illegal, according to Executive Order 1233 - which has been in effect since the Ford administration (I believe). However, like a few others mentioned, coalition (US) troops were “officially” under fire – easily justifying lethal force.

Was a crime committed against Iraq? You mean the country that is currently under US/UK joint administration? It would be interesting to see any court take up that case.

And, if you are interested, the chances of G.W. Bush (or anyone in the Bush administration) being charged with “war crimes” in this whole Iraq fiasco are nil - considering war crimes against Bush the Elder (the infamous “Highway of Death”, etc.) are still pending from what I have heard (and Ramsey Clark doesn’t seem to be proceeding that quickly, or effectively).

War Crimes against Bush the Elder – Ramsey Clark
http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htm
Good info and link.

Gruesome picture.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#48
nefar559 said:
enough said.
u damn right. amongst all that babbling, it turnz out you know nothing. wut i wuz saying iz you people BITCH and BITCH about tha government and go out of your way to find thingz to complain about on here.... BUT YOUR NOT CHANGING ANYTHING. you're juzt making foolz of yourselvez.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#49
2-0-Sixx said:
Yeah, who gives a fuck what are government is doing. Who gives a fuck that the government kills innocent people? Who cares? Obviously not uneducated Americans like yourself.
So anyone who complains about our government is “anti-american” and needs to move out of the country? What is this a police state???
you're a soft-hearted pussy. end of that story.

If I could go to Iraq and have conversation with U.S troops I’m sure most of them would tell me that the war is bullshit and they want to go home. Don’t believe me? Read some articles on the internet. The troops don’t want to be there.
i know many troopz who are there, they say otherwize.

I would comment on this, but I see nefar properly put you in your place.
riiiiiiight buddy. nice try.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#51
anathematics said:
Assassination (for political ends or otherwise) is technically illegal, according to Executive Order 1233 - which has been in effect since the Ford administration (I believe). However, like a few others mentioned, coalition (US) troops were “officially” under fire – easily justifying lethal force.

Was a crime committed against Iraq? You mean the country that is currently under US/UK joint administration? It would be interesting to see any court take up that case.

And, if you are interested, the chances of G.W. Bush (or anyone in the Bush administration) being charged with “war crimes” in this whole Iraq fiasco are nil - considering war crimes against Bush the Elder (the infamous “Highway of Death”, etc.) are still pending from what I have heard (and Ramsey Clark doesn’t seem to be proceeding that quickly, or effectively).

War Crimes against Bush the Elder – Ramsey Clark
http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htm
Thanks for the info. It's very helpful. :)
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#52
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:


u damn right. amongst all that babbling, it turnz out you know nothing. wut i wuz saying iz you people BITCH and BITCH about tha government and go out of your way to find thingz to complain about on here.... BUT YOUR NOT CHANGING ANYTHING. you're juzt making foolz of yourselvez.
The only people who are making fools out of themselves are the ones who let their government get over on them and believe the lies it tells them..........
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
42
#53
HERESY said:
BTW I WANNA ADD THIS. WHY IS IT THAT SADDAMS SONS ARE ALL OF A SUDDEN "KILLED"? JUST WHEN BUSH WAS UNDER SCRUTINY FOR NOT FINDING WMD....

NOW YOUR ATTENTION IS DIVERTED...


LMAO

:h:
ITS A CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!
 
Jul 10, 2003
27
0
0
#54
HERESY said:
BTW I WANNA ADD THIS. WHY IS IT THAT SADDAMS SONS ARE ALL OF A SUDDEN "KILLED"? JUST WHEN BUSH WAS UNDER SCRUTINY FOR NOT FINDING WMD....

NOW YOUR ATTENTION IS DIVERTED...


LMAO

:h:
Definitely an interesting point - one I pondered myself...why now? Bush is awfully lucky though - especially with Clinton recently (I think within the last few days *7-23-03*) stating that Bush's statement (the infamous "16 words") in the State of the Union address was (quotations paraphrased) "inappropriate" but he (Bush) "didn't lie" per se - a defeat to the indefatigable attacks from the Left - one would think.

Oh well, I am just ecstatic the deaths of Saddam's boys happened on the day that Jessica Lynch came home - it silenced the media from glorifying "the day POW Lynch came home".
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#55
anathematics said:
Oh well, I am just ecstatic the deaths of Saddam's boys happened on the day that Jessica Lynch came home - it silenced the media from glorifying "the day POW Lynch came home".
Somewhat, but not completely.......
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#57
America's Uday and Qusay Conjuring Trick

First I want to say that Bush and team are fuckin hypocrits for critisizing Arab media for showing dead americans on T.V.


If the latest story about the adventurous American 101st Airborne Division was true, Saddam Hussein's two sons, his grandson and their solitary bodyguard, would have to go down in history as some of the world’s greatest and bravest fighters. According to the media these four heroic individuals, including one cripple and one child, managed to fight off 200 heavily armed and highly aggressive members of the 101st Airborne for six long hours, before finally perishing in a hail of Hellfire missiles launched by helicopter gunships.
The only way four lonely defenders could stay alive more than five minutes under these circumstances, would be if they were inside a heavily reinforced underground bunker, protected James Bond-style by automatic or remote controlled heavy weapons. But no, the gang of four were allegedly quietly sipping mint tea in the kitchen of a completely vulnerable Mosul villa, which had earlier been used by members of the 101st Airborne as requisitioned accommodation.
Time to leave the Washington world of media spin for a moment here, and briefly touch base with reality. Uday and Qusay do not get along at the best of times, and in any event, for security reasons travel independently with separate highly-trained teams of special forces bodyguards front and rear.
Uday and Qusay always have “back doors” through which to exit from any given location or locations, and would be insane to even consider hiding in a house in Mosul, a northern Iraqi city surrounded on all sides by murderous Kurdish terrorists, each and every one of whom would murder either or both brothers for ten cents. Both brothers are flamboyant and perhaps even eccentric, but neither is insane. Now let us discard reality completely, and catch up with the latest absurd White House propaganda.
"Individuals of very high interest to the coalition forces were hiding out in the building," Lieutenant Colonel William Bishop of the 101st Airborne Division told Reuters, which of course begs the question of why these “Individuals of very high interest” were not simply surrounded, and then slowly starved out of the photogenic villa in a blaze of media publicity. Nor am I alone in wondering about this obvious beneficial alternative course of action.
Fox News military analyst Colonel Bill Cowan said he hoped Saddam's sons had been captured and not killed. "I think in this case, it'd be great to have them alive," he said. "I think for the [Iraqi] population to see these two guys. shackled, incarcerated and really given harsh treatment, will have a most profound and long-term psychological advantage."
Alas, this was not to be, because the 200 members of the brave 101st apparently found the two men, one cripple and one boy in the photogenic villa much too much hard to handle. An anonymous soldier “involved” in the operation allegedly told Steve Centanni of Fox News that containment was not an option. "We received direct fire from the building multiple times. We used a scaled escalation of force, and had to use bigger caliber weapons to render the building safe" The 101st Airborne allegedly used all the weapons in its arsenal, including grenade launchers, missiles and helicopters.
It was around this point in time that the four dead “Individuals of very high interest” were converted into “three Husseins and a single bodyguard”, primarily because a US official told Fox News "they were shot up so much that it is difficult to make a positive identification of the bodies”. Decoded, this of course meant that the White House could go ahead with its master propaganda ploy to demoralize the Iraqi people, by claiming Saddam’s two sons were dead.
Certainly it was time to kill someone other than poor old Saddam, who has allegedly been killed so often by American forces that nowadays no-one, including American servicemen, believes this pathetic rubbish. So the staged deaths of “hated” Uday and Qusay Hussein were a new version of the old Saddam theme, designed not only to demoralize the Iraqi people, but also to bolster American military morale, which recently reached non-existent level in Iraq.
In their rush to “verify” the new propaganda and make it stick, American officials have unwittingly uncovered a more profound level of Administration untruth, going to the very heart of how many “wanted” Iraqis on the famous “Deck of Cards” have actually been captured, or are still at large. In what may yet prove to be a terminal error of judgement, a White House official told CNN yesterday that the bodies of Uday and Qusay had been visually “positively identified” by none other than Lieutenant General Abid Hamid Mahmud al Tikriti, Saddam’s closest aide, and the Ace of Diamonds in the pack. You may remember that the American Administration claimed to have captured Lieutenant General al Tikriti on June 17, 2003, but for reasons that will soon become obvious, failed to parade him shackled and shamed in front of the world media, just as Colonel Bill Cowan of Fox News wanted to do with Uday and Qusay Hussein.

Rest of article below.

http://www.joevialls.co.uk/transpositions/hussein.html

 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#59
It’s fascinating to me that these two men, along with a crippled man, and a 14year old boy, [no bodyguards] held off 200 troops, 2 helicopters, tanks, and grenade launchers for six hours!!!

Either these two men were the fiercest combat warriors the world has ever seen or the "official" story really isn’t that official.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,108
17
0
45
#60
whuts the happs was it a bomb or bullets?

question for the witnesses.

does this make the hardcore iraqi's ride harder or does it discourage them?