im not gonna get into it. i dont give a shit about any bodies opinion. a bad game plan dont mean bad fight, as far as me sayin greatest fight ever. he won every rd imo with a bad game plan. its not that deep but its obvious it dont make sense to you. it is what it is. im not gonna go back and fourth. you guys are all right. high five. you argue with mental tactic and i dont have time for that. mental gymnastics. if it makes you feel better then take it.
At the end of the day Boxing is about landing punches. That's how a fight is won or lost. So if he's not landing more punches, not landing more significant punches, he's not dodging more punches, then I really don't know what else is left. Him being an 0-0 fighter doesnt give him extra credit. That's not how scoring works. Him being in the ring with "the greatest ever" doesnt give him extra credit. It's always going to boil down to punches.
So I'm extremely interested to understand what you saw in the fight that no one else did.
i know Lomachenko. i do like him. who said i want to see fluid motion. i never brought that into this thread and never said Conor was water in the ring.
I did just look back at one page that I thought was interesting, battle said Conor will gass after three rounds because he won't be used to boxing and you countered by saying he shouldn't because "thats cus in a 3 round mma fight, you only get 2 breaks. and your fighting for 5 minutes. a 15 minute boxing match you get 4 breaks and your fighting for 3 minutes. so i dont doubt anymore than Conor can go 12 boxing. unless he constantly throws punches that dont connect which will drain him. if he's missing that much, then that means Floyd is fucking Conor up and Conor gets stopped.
So I'm curious what you think about the bolded? Recently you were saying Conor was doing things we can't see, slipping all of Floyd's punches, won every round but one before the stoppage, but because of the bold, it would seem perhaps Conor was missing a lot of punches and was getting fucked up. Curious about that. Or was there a different reason?
some say Lomachenko has that foorwork cus of dance lessons. maybe. if so, he brought somethng from the outside to the ring. good for him. i said things about Conor bringin somethin new but you still painted your own picture. you think Lomachenko looked dope (cus he is) cus he looks like a boxer. not sure why you made the comparrison on my behalf. didnt work, but i get it.