Marquez Foot stopper against Pacman III

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
naner12

naner12

Sicc OG
#61
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#61
8FIVE8 said:
yeah thats cool, i dont know much about boxing. whatever. i saw the fight. do u think marquez won?
Click to expand...
I thought he won slightly as I said in the other thread. I thought it was extremely close, especially certain rounds and have no problem with any outcome of the fight. I don't think it was a robbery just a good, close fight like the other two.

I don't really care if people think Pacquiao won the fight that's on them if you think Pacquiao won more power to you, but he didn't win because he landed a measly 3 more punches a round.
 
naner12

naner12

Sicc OG
#62
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#62
corinthian said:
pacman landed more power punches too though.
Click to expand...
Power punches are counted as anything not a jab. If someone lands an arm punch left hook that has no power it's going to be counted as a power punch just like a crushing right hand that wobbles someone. That's exactly why you can't just look at this numbers especially in a tight fight and say ok he won because he landed 3 more a round.
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#63
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#63
naner12 said:
I thought he won slightly as I said in the other thread. I thought it was extremely close, especially certain rounds and have no problem with any outcome of the fight. I don't think it was a robbery just a good, close fight like the other two.

I don't really care if people think Pacquiao won the fight that's on them if you think Pacquiao won more power to you, but he didn't win because he landed a measly 3 more punches a round.
Click to expand...
^^Period!

I thought Marquez won a close fight too but I don't think it was a "robbery" though, too close of a fight to be called a "robbery".

Controversial? Yes, because a lot of people scored it a draw or had Marquez winning.
Robbery? No, it was too close of a fight.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#64
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#64
Compubox is literally two guys with a clicker attached to a laptop who count the punches in real time (see picture below). It's something we should always take with a grain of salt, especially when there are flurries of punches thrown it's nearly impossible in real time to see exactly which ones land which ones miss.

A good example is Calzaghe vs Hopkins. Compubox had Calzaghe landing something like 208 punches total. I've seen a slow motion replay of the entire fight someone made with all the punches counted and Calzaghe landed something like a total of 40-60 punches or some bullshit like that. It's amazing how inaccurate compubox can be.

Now, that isn't to say pacquiao didn't land/throw more against Marquez, just saying.

If compubox really wants to have credibility they should have a live unofficial punch count during the fight, then within the next couple days they should re-watch the fight, with the luxury of watching on a TV and the ability to slow it down if need be, then release official numbers.

Compubox
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#65
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#65
Lol, there was no way Calzaghe landed 200 punches against Bernard....

He only landed like one "effective" punch the whole fight. I still remember, it was a good left hand I think, straight down the middle, other than that, I don't remember him landing that many punches. What a joke.... 200 punches landed against Bernard Hopkins? Yeahhhh right....
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#66
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#66
yeah the HBO crew kept talking about how Calzaghe landed more punches on bernard than anyone in history who fought him I was thinking, "you've got to be kidding me!!"

They probably counted 8 landed punches in this exchange when in reality NONE landed!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom