LONG LIVE SADDAM!
- Thread starter HERESY
- Start date
Innocent civilians I might add. If we're talking about humans in general Qusay ordered thousands of prisoners to a hanging hall just in a matter of days. The number 10,000 is being extremely generous. You hit it on the head with this type of information being over everyone's head.
Not I, nor has anyone I have ever seen on this message board even hinted that Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. Why are we so happy? Because one of the biggest mass murderers to ever live has finally been captured. Did you know he executed children and family members of criminals?
There are mass grave sites and torture chambers that contain more proof then will ever be needed.
Not I, nor has anyone I have ever seen on this message board even hinted that Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. Why are we so happy? Because one of the biggest mass murderers to ever live has finally been captured. Did you know he executed children and family members of criminals?
There are mass grave sites and torture chambers that contain more proof then will ever be needed.
Now it seems your the one following me.
I cannot be a "Heresy wannabe" because we differ on way too many things. However, I have talked with Heresy before, and I can say I do have respect for the man. Mainly because he doesn't let bullshit outside factors control his thoughts, unlike little bitches like you who believe everything Fox news spews out. You can keep running around on the siccness saying the same bullshit, talking shit...knowing damn well you wouldn't say any of this shit to someone’s face. Stay in your wonderful dreamland, comrade.
I cannot be a "Heresy wannabe" because we differ on way too many things. However, I have talked with Heresy before, and I can say I do have respect for the man. Mainly because he doesn't let bullshit outside factors control his thoughts, unlike little bitches like you who believe everything Fox news spews out. You can keep running around on the siccness saying the same bullshit, talking shit...knowing damn well you wouldn't say any of this shit to someone’s face. Stay in your wonderful dreamland, comrade.
What I can't figure out is you seem to be so strongly and passionately opposed to America and hate it so much, yet you are still here. If you really felt that strongly in your convictions, why stay here?
(And this is not a "If you don't like it, get the fuck out" comment).
If you seriously hate something so much, why stay?
(And this is not a "If you don't like it, get the fuck out" comment).
If you seriously hate something so much, why stay?
That question will never get a real answer (to anyone you ask), because cop-outs such as "because my family is here" are too easily said. What I want to know is, for the people who hate America so much because of it's evil ways, why hasn't anything been said about Saddam and Iraq, which has proven to be far more evil and cold blooded. It's ok to acknowledge and indulge in topics where Saddam's atrocious leadership is at question, you can still hate America!
Got bias?
If a man carrying the burden of his previous leaders orders the capture of a mass murderer without a search warrant, why are you going to cry about it?
The Anti-American posts are depleting.
The Bush approval rating jumped from 52% to 58% in 24 hours.
Got bias?
If a man carrying the burden of his previous leaders orders the capture of a mass murderer without a search warrant, why are you going to cry about it?
The Anti-American posts are depleting.
The Bush approval rating jumped from 52% to 58% in 24 hours.
WHY IS IT THAT A*** NEW*** IRAQI TRIBUNAL WAS CREATED JUST ***DAYS*** BEFORE THE CAPTURE OF "SADDAM"?????
FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW THE TRIBUNAL WAS SET UP TO TRY WAR CRIMES AND WAR CRIMINALS.
THE PLOTS/STORYLINES FROM W.W.E ARE MORE REALISTIC...
BTW TADOU 206 ISN'T A CLONE. HE IS A FREE THINKER. HE AND I DISAGREE ON SEVERAL ISSUES BUT I DO RESPECT HIS OPINIONS. UNLIKE OTHERS ON THE BOARD HE TAKES TIME TO RESEARCH. HE COULD BE AN IDIOT (LIKE MOST HERE) AND BELIEVE EVERYTHING PLACED ON THE TABLE BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS.
SO NOW I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS:
1.WHY IS IT THAT PRO WAR ADVOCATES FAIL TO DISCUSS THE CFR AND TLC?
2.WHY WAS A NEW TRIBUNAL CREATED JUST DAYS BEFORE THE CAPTURE OF "SADDAM"?
@EVERYONE ELSE I WILL BE LEAVING AMERICA. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THAT.
HGK
FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW THE TRIBUNAL WAS SET UP TO TRY WAR CRIMES AND WAR CRIMINALS.
THE PLOTS/STORYLINES FROM W.W.E ARE MORE REALISTIC...
BTW TADOU 206 ISN'T A CLONE. HE IS A FREE THINKER. HE AND I DISAGREE ON SEVERAL ISSUES BUT I DO RESPECT HIS OPINIONS. UNLIKE OTHERS ON THE BOARD HE TAKES TIME TO RESEARCH. HE COULD BE AN IDIOT (LIKE MOST HERE) AND BELIEVE EVERYTHING PLACED ON THE TABLE BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS.
SO NOW I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS:
1.WHY IS IT THAT PRO WAR ADVOCATES FAIL TO DISCUSS THE CFR AND TLC?
2.WHY WAS A NEW TRIBUNAL CREATED JUST DAYS BEFORE THE CAPTURE OF "SADDAM"?
@EVERYONE ELSE I WILL BE LEAVING AMERICA. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THAT.
HGK
TLC-- trilateral commision
http://www.trilateral.org/about.htm
About the Organization
The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. Originally established for three years, our work has been renewed for successive triennia (three-year periods), most recently for a triennium to be completed in 2006.
When the first triennium of the Trilateral Commission was launched in 1973, the most immediate purpose was to draw together—at a time of considerable friction among governments—the highest level unofficial group possible to look together at the key common problems facing our three areas. At a deeper level, there was a sense that the United States was no longer in such a singular leadership position as it had been in earlier post-World War II years, and that a more shared form of leadership—including Europe and Japan in particular—would be needed for the international system to navigate successfully the major challenges of the coming years.
Two strong convictions guide our thinking for the 2004-2006 triennium. First, the Trilateral Commission remains as important as ever in helping our countries fulfill their shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system and, second, its framework needs to be widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, and Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.
The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s is deepening into “globalization.” The need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) remain the primary anchors of the wider international system, has not diminished but, if anything, intensified. At the same time, their leadership must change to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system. As relations with other countries become more mature—and power more diffuse—the leadership tasks of the original Trilateral countries need to be carried out with others to an increasing extent.
The members of the Trilateral Commission are about 350 distinguished leaders in business, media, academia, public service (excluding current national Cabinet Ministers), labor unions, and other non-governmental organizations from the three regions. The regional Chairmen, Deputy Chairmen, and Directors constitute the leadership of the Trilateral Commission, along with an Executive Committee including about 40 other members.
The annual meeting of Trilateral Commission members rotates among the three regions. It was held in Seoul in 2003, Washington, D.C. in 2002 and London in 2001. The 2004 annual meeting will be held in Warsaw. The agendas for these meetings have addressed a wide range of issues, an indication of how broadly we see the partnership among our countries. A publication on the annual meeting (Trialogue) draws together each year’s presentations.
The project work of the Trilateral Commission generally involves teams of authors from our three regions working together for a year or so on draft reports which are discussed in draft form in the annual meeting and then published. The authors typically consult with many others in the course of their work. The task force reports (Triangle Papers) to the Trilateral Commission have covered a wide range of topics.
The regional groups within the Trilateral Commission carry on some activities of their own. The European Group, with its secretariat based in Paris, has an annual weekend meeting each fall. The North American Group, with its secretariat based in Washington D.C. began North American regional meetings in 2002 and occasionally gathers with a special speaker for a dinner or luncheon event. The new Pacific Asian Group, with its secretariat based in Tokyo, began regional meetings in 2000. Each region carries on its own fund-raising to provide the financial support needed for the Trilateral Commission’s work.
CFR---council of foreign relations-- as a matter a fact Hillary Clinton just gave a speech before the CFR a yesterday
http://www.trilateral.org/about.htm
About the Organization
The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. Originally established for three years, our work has been renewed for successive triennia (three-year periods), most recently for a triennium to be completed in 2006.
When the first triennium of the Trilateral Commission was launched in 1973, the most immediate purpose was to draw together—at a time of considerable friction among governments—the highest level unofficial group possible to look together at the key common problems facing our three areas. At a deeper level, there was a sense that the United States was no longer in such a singular leadership position as it had been in earlier post-World War II years, and that a more shared form of leadership—including Europe and Japan in particular—would be needed for the international system to navigate successfully the major challenges of the coming years.
Two strong convictions guide our thinking for the 2004-2006 triennium. First, the Trilateral Commission remains as important as ever in helping our countries fulfill their shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system and, second, its framework needs to be widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, and Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.
The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s is deepening into “globalization.” The need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) remain the primary anchors of the wider international system, has not diminished but, if anything, intensified. At the same time, their leadership must change to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system. As relations with other countries become more mature—and power more diffuse—the leadership tasks of the original Trilateral countries need to be carried out with others to an increasing extent.
The members of the Trilateral Commission are about 350 distinguished leaders in business, media, academia, public service (excluding current national Cabinet Ministers), labor unions, and other non-governmental organizations from the three regions. The regional Chairmen, Deputy Chairmen, and Directors constitute the leadership of the Trilateral Commission, along with an Executive Committee including about 40 other members.
The annual meeting of Trilateral Commission members rotates among the three regions. It was held in Seoul in 2003, Washington, D.C. in 2002 and London in 2001. The 2004 annual meeting will be held in Warsaw. The agendas for these meetings have addressed a wide range of issues, an indication of how broadly we see the partnership among our countries. A publication on the annual meeting (Trialogue) draws together each year’s presentations.
The project work of the Trilateral Commission generally involves teams of authors from our three regions working together for a year or so on draft reports which are discussed in draft form in the annual meeting and then published. The authors typically consult with many others in the course of their work. The task force reports (Triangle Papers) to the Trilateral Commission have covered a wide range of topics.
The regional groups within the Trilateral Commission carry on some activities of their own. The European Group, with its secretariat based in Paris, has an annual weekend meeting each fall. The North American Group, with its secretariat based in Washington D.C. began North American regional meetings in 2002 and occasionally gathers with a special speaker for a dinner or luncheon event. The new Pacific Asian Group, with its secretariat based in Tokyo, began regional meetings in 2000. Each region carries on its own fund-raising to provide the financial support needed for the Trilateral Commission’s work.
CFR---council of foreign relations-- as a matter a fact Hillary Clinton just gave a speech before the CFR a yesterday
http://www.cfr.org/about/mission.php
Mission
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Council History
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments. The Council, which is headquartered in New York with an office in Washington, DC, does this by:
Convening meetings in New York, Washington and in other select American cities where senior government officials, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to debate and discuss the major issues of our time;
Conducting a wide-ranging studies program where Council fellows produce articles and books that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations;
Publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal covering international affairs and U.S. foreign policy;
Maintaining a diverse membership, including special programs to foster interest and expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders;
Sponsoring independent task forces whose reports help set the public foreign policy agenda; and
Providing up-to-date information about the world and U.S. foreign policy on the Council's website, www.cfr.org.
Mission
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Council History
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments. The Council, which is headquartered in New York with an office in Washington, DC, does this by:
Convening meetings in New York, Washington and in other select American cities where senior government officials, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to debate and discuss the major issues of our time;
Conducting a wide-ranging studies program where Council fellows produce articles and books that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations;
Publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal covering international affairs and U.S. foreign policy;
Maintaining a diverse membership, including special programs to foster interest and expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders;
Sponsoring independent task forces whose reports help set the public foreign policy agenda; and
Providing up-to-date information about the world and U.S. foreign policy on the Council's website, www.cfr.org.
"they are world government agencies that promote world peace and prosperity"
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Next you'll tell the board the CFR and TLC were not funded by Rothschilds.
Mcleanhatch do you care to elaborate on what the CFR and TLC does in Africa? You know all those prosperity things they promote in Africa? You do know what I'm talking about right? How the CFR and TLC (with the help of the world conservation bank) RAPE resources and land from poverty stricken countries? How they LOAN countries money but OWN all mineral rights etc etc etc? Next you'll tell the board the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM isn't privately owned.
Tadou I don't mind you asking questions, I encourage them. However I won't entertain your stupidity. Why? Well look at HOW you asked your question. You show a "I dont give a fuck" attitude so why bother? Topics dealing with foreign policy, the american government and funding are topics YOU should not participate in. Why? How can you elaborate/discuss world policy when you know nothing about the CFR? Thats like trying to drive a car when you've never heard of gas.....
If you're a free thinker research the council and commision on your own time.
"The most powerful cliques in these elitist groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States."-Former COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS member Chester Ward.
"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship."-Congressman John R. Rarick
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Next you'll tell the board the CFR and TLC were not funded by Rothschilds.
Mcleanhatch do you care to elaborate on what the CFR and TLC does in Africa? You know all those prosperity things they promote in Africa? You do know what I'm talking about right? How the CFR and TLC (with the help of the world conservation bank) RAPE resources and land from poverty stricken countries? How they LOAN countries money but OWN all mineral rights etc etc etc? Next you'll tell the board the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM isn't privately owned.
Tadou I don't mind you asking questions, I encourage them. However I won't entertain your stupidity. Why? Well look at HOW you asked your question. You show a "I dont give a fuck" attitude so why bother? Topics dealing with foreign policy, the american government and funding are topics YOU should not participate in. Why? How can you elaborate/discuss world policy when you know nothing about the CFR? Thats like trying to drive a car when you've never heard of gas.....
If you're a free thinker research the council and commision on your own time.
"The most powerful cliques in these elitist groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States."-Former COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS member Chester Ward.
"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship."-Congressman John R. Rarick