JOSH MCCOWN OF THE OAKLAND RAIDERS

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

lErK

Sicc OG
Nov 7, 2004
737
0
0
#61
Solitary 1 said:
THE NINERS WERE STILL GOOD BACK THEN. BUT SAME POSITION? NO. THE NINERS HAVEN'T BEEN DIVISION CHAMPS SINCE 94. RAIDERS WERE IN 02.
Wrong homie. Niners were division champs in 02. Thats the last time we won the division. Last time we won a super bowl was 94 ill give you that but we havent sucked for that many years.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#62
lErK said:
Niners were division champs in 02. Thats the last time we won the division.
Exactly. It was also the last time the Niners and raiders were any good. And like I said, they played eachother that year and the Niners won it.

Unless he's talking about Conference champs.. Which is a different story completely because that was before the AFC became dominate. The Niners lost to the Buccs, who would end up spanking and embarrassing the raiders in the SuperBowl. Neither team could handle the Buccs that year, so again I would say both teams were about the same.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
#63
lErK said:
Wrong homie. Niners were division champs in 02. Thats the last time we won the division. Last time we won a super bowl was 94 ill give you that but we havent sucked for that many years.

MY BAD. I MEANT CONFERANCE CHAMPS.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
#64
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:

Unless he's talking about Conference champs.. Which is a different story completely because that was before the AFC became dominate. .
ACTUALLY THE AFC HAD ALLREADY STARTED TO BECOME DOMINANT. BALTIMORE WON IN 2000 AND THE PATS WON IN 2001. WE HAD TO MAKE IT PAST BOTH OF THOSE TEAMS IN 2002.

THE 2002 BUCS WERE AN ANOMALY. NOT ONE NFC TEAM HAS WON THE SUPERBOWL SINCE.
 

lErK

Sicc OG
Nov 7, 2004
737
0
0
#66
Solitary 1 said:
MY BAD. I MEANT CONFERANCE CHAMPS.
Yeah well if your conferance champs that pretty much means thats the last time you went to the superbowl. You guys got us on that ill give you that. Personally though I hope the raiders do good. I wanna see a battle of the bay in the superbowl. That would be the shit but realisticly I dont think the raiders are gonna be that good this year. They will be better then last year thats for sure but I say at the most they win 6 games.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#67
Solitary 1 said:
ACTUALLY THE AFC HAD ALLREADY STARTED TO BECOME DOMINANT. BALTIMORE WON IN 2000 AND THE PATS WON IN 2001. WE HAD TO MAKE IT PAST BOTH OF THOSE TEAMS IN 2002.

THE 2002 BUCS WERE AN ANOMALY. NOT ONE NFC TEAM HAS WON THE SUPERBOWL SINCE.

true statement, and don't forget who won in 98 & 99
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#72
Solitary 1 said:
ACTUALLY THE AFC HAD ALLREADY STARTED TO BECOME DOMINANT. BALTIMORE WON IN 2000 AND THE PATS WON IN 2001.
And before that it was just Denver.. The NFC had won 14 of 16 SuperBowls.. That's dominant. Having a team win it in 2 out of 4 years is not dominant.

Solitary 1 said:
THE 2002 BUCS WERE AN ANOMALY. NOT ONE NFC TEAM HAS WON THE SUPERBOWL SINCE.
No, the AFC just sucked that year. The Niners were equipped to beat every AFC team in 2002.. They beat the AFC Champs to prove it.. And they were clearly not the best team in the NFC.

The whole point is you were saying that Niner fans always dog your raiders, even in 02 when they were conference champs.. All I'm trying to say is that Niner fans were in position to do so. It's not like we were 2-14 the year you guys made it to the Bowl and we were still clownin. Both teams were good and the Niners proved to be the better team, so of course they're gonna have some harsh shit to say about the raiders. Why not?
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#73
Solitary 1 said:
OH SHIT.. MY BAD.. THAT'S 4 YEARS IN A ROW.. THAT FATAL, IS DOMINATION.
4 years in a row? What?

The current streak is 4 years for the AFC.. The year the Buccs won it the AFC was on a whopping 2 year streak. Are you forgetting the Rams in 2000?

But like I said.. 14 out of 16 Bowls.. 13 in a row.. THAT is DOMINATION.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
#74
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
4 years in a row? What?

The current streak is 4 years for the AFC.. The year the Buccs won it the AFC was on a whopping 2 year streak. Are you forgetting the Rams in 2000?

But like I said.. 14 out of 16 Bowls.. 13 in a row.. THAT is DOMINATION.
YEAH YOU'RE RIGHT..RAMS WON IN 99. I FORGOT.

IT WAS 97 AND 98 SB WINS FOR DENVER.. 00 AND 01 RAVENS AND THE PATS.. SO THAT'S 3 TO 2 IN THAT 5 YEAR SPAN FROM 97-2002..THE AFC HAS WON 8 OUT OF THE LAST 10 YEARS..ONLY STL AND TAMPA HAS WON FOR THE NFC IN THE LAST DECADE. 2 OUT OF 10 YEARS..

DOMINATION..
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#75
I would say starting from the 70's... it was the AFC dominating.
In the 80's and 90's it was the NFC dominating.
Now it's looking like in the 2000's the AFC is dominating.
 
Feb 28, 2007
923
0
0
39
#77
Solitary 1 said:
UNLESS YOU GOT SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS SUBJECT EVERY BODY GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY THREAD.
LOL! Your a funny dude. Fuck your thread and your fuckin couch.

Shit ill talk about Barack Obama in this bitch if I want... " get the fuck out " bitch you get the fuck out dont act like you didnt know this shit was goin to happen. Especially in a raider thread. I swear yall crack me up with post like these. Please Mr. Solitary dont come out of the computer and slap me...lol.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
#79
BrOwn_BoY said:
LOL! Your a funny dude. Fuck your thread and your fuckin couch.

Shit ill talk about Barack Obama in this bitch if I want... " get the fuck out " bitch you get the fuck out dont act like you didnt know this shit was goin to happen. Especially in a raider thread. I swear yall crack me up with post like these. Please Mr. Solitary dont come out of the computer and slap me...lol.


THAT POST WASN'T DIRECTED AT YOU. BUT SINCE YOU WANNA TALK ALL GREASY LIKE YOU'RE INSECURE OR SOMETHING I JUST THOUGHT I'D LET YOU KNOW YOU KNOW YOU'RE ONE OF THE "RAIDER FANS" ON THIS FORUM THAT MAKES US ALL LOOK BAD.

:dead: