Come on now Heresy, they (both Mosley and Mayweather) agreed to "RANDOM" testing up until the day of without a cutoff date.
So when did "RANDOM" mean to stop almost three weeks before the fight? And you're missing the point Tony, Mosley is a KNOWN ped user, so there should have been a number of random tests all the way until the fight, not random tests then a three week gap.
Mayweather nor Mosley never knew when they were going to stop testing.
You still don't get it do you? Mosley is a KNOWN ped user, and because he is a known ped user, it should have been stipulated that there be no breaks in the testing or that he specifically have a number of tests in the last two weeks before the fight. Seriously, if you're going to say you're "cleaning up the sport", go all out but make it fair and equitable for all parties involved. Don't say guy A can do X but guy B has to do Y when there is no evidence to support he should do Y.
It's up to the agency in regards to when they're going to stop testing.
Now we're back to this agency shit, Tony? Listen, if you can include stipulations, rules and tests that the SANCTIONING BODIES of professional boxing do NOT require, you can tell the agency when you want the tests, when they are going to stop, etc. Cut the bullshit, Tony.
If they want to stop testing 5 days before the fight or 10 days it's up to them. Random means that they could have been tested anytime, without notice.
So test ANYTIME and WITHOUT notice up until the day of the fight. Don't stop almost three weeks before the fight when one of the guys has a history of using peds.
Pacquiao wasn't cool with that, he needed notice and a date when they would stop testing.
One of the users here said you don't understand logic and reason, and I want to give you the benefit of the doubt but you're making it hard. There is nothing wrong with him needing a date when they stopped testing because he has never been connected with peds. It would be unreasonable to not need a notice and a date of when they would stop.
During the real negotiations for Mayweather vs Pacquiao, Mayweather came down from random to 14 days and was willing to give Pacquiao a cut off date of two weeks. So Mosley never got a cut off date.
Tony, what do you call no tests 19 days before the fight? Regardless of how you slice it that is a cut off date. BTW, they stopped testing BOTH fighters at around the same time so why can't Floyd agree to a 24 day cut off when they stopped testing him at around 18/19 days?
BTW, I can shoot you a link to the actual drug test results (for both fighters) if you want.
What you and the rest of the "Froid" fans are forgetting is that Pac also agreed to being tested
immediately after the fight.
Pacquiao would've had one, so actually Floyd was tougher on Shane. Once he got Shane to agree to RANDOM without a cut off date, he now feels that he should be able to get Pacquiao to agree to RANDOM without a cut off date too....
Listen, Shane has admitted to taking peds. Shane should have been tested up until the day of the fight not given a pass. Aside from Floyd, no other fighter has called for Pac to be tested in this fashion. So why does he need to agree to a RANDOM without a cut off date? Because he had stipulations of weight? Because he had stipulations of glove size? To you and everyone else, those things are all acceptable and fall within the rules and confines of the sanctioning bodies. What Floyd is requesting falls outside the scope of the sanctioning bodies. Do you understand now?
And here is the big question:
How come Mosley isn't asking for Pac to be tested?