how many of y'all actually care if we go to war with iraq?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#82
because of the Iran-Iraq war in the 80's... LOL, you wanna know how ironic this shit is, the US helped place the Shah of Iran in power after WWII removing democratic president (operation ajax) then the Shah ended up turning on us, then we help Saddam fight Iran and even fund a chemical weapon program for him (we know what he did with those chemicals later) then he ends up turning on us. Then when Afgahnistan is fighting Russia, we train Osama Bin Laden and supply their country with weapons (which leads to the rise of the taliban) and then bin laden turns on us. Hey I got an idea.... STOP INSTIGATING!!!!!!!!!
 
Jul 9, 2002
1,369
0
36
44
#85
I dont know if anyone's mentioned this but that Golf War syndrome shit will be back when our people get back and guess what the Govt will do to help them NOTHING!
I wont fight in any war this country starts.
 
Apr 26, 2002
1,110
0
0
#86
Nobody'z Biz...

How the fuck are you gonna compare cesar chavez with a gang...a gang started by prison inmates on top of that, a gang that KILLS THEIR OWN PEOPLE.


Oh yeah and please, spare me the fucking novel with all the "sophisticated words", I swear your just like the East Co Co version of Tadou.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#87
Snubnoze said:
Then when Afgahnistan is fighting Russia, we train Osama Bin Laden and supply their country with weapons (which leads to the rise of the taliban) and then bin laden turns on us. Hey I got an idea.... STOP INSTIGATING!!!!!!!!!
let me get somthing strainght because you are spoinning the truth. we (USA) supported the Muhajadeen ( SP) in their attempt to expel the SOVIETS not the Russians from spreading COMMUNISM. now just because Bin Laden happened to be one of the Fighters for the Northern Alliance/Mujahadeen doesnt mean that we supported HIM we supported the opposing force to the SOVIET UNION AND COMMUNISM
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#88
Snubnoze said:
here, I'll make a conservative arguement against the war.... Do I think Sadam is a threat to our nation? No. Do I think he's a threat to his own people? Yes. Its the people of Iraq's problem to revolt against their ruler, not ours.
my answers to the wuestions that you posted

1. yes he is a danger to us.

2. yes he is a danger to his own people.

hers somemore questions to ask.

Q. is he a danger to Israel (one of our closest Allies)

A. yes, he is a danger to them, he destabalizes the region and is a terrorist himself becuse he encourages suicide bombers in Palisinian territories and pais them for their killing of innocent lives.

Q. Is he a threat to the rest of the Region by invading his neighbors?

A. yes, he has Invaded Kuwait and iran. and has threatened to invade Saudi Arabia

Q. so all in all does he have to disapear???

A. yes and the sooner the better wheather it be peacefuly or by force!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#90
CHRISHOGG14 said:
i don't understand why people are sticking up for saddam???? he needs to die. i hate to say it, but i love saying it at the same time.
its because alote of people are of the mind-set of Sheryl Crow the singer in that they believe that "war is ALWAYS bad" and that "we should try our hardest to have no emenies".

its just typical liberals living in La-La land who think that war is never the answer.
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#91
let me get somthing strainght because you are spoinning the truth. we (USA) supported the Muhajadeen ( SP) in their attempt to expel the SOVIETS not the Russians from spreading COMMUNISM. now just because Bin Laden happened to be one of the Fighters for the Northern Alliance/Mujahadeen doesnt mean that we supported HIM we supported the opposing force to the SOVIET UNION AND COMMUNISM
Ya.... and? Were we or were we not supporting him in order to maintain containment? The answer is simple, yes. If there is any "spinning" going on its what I just read from you...

1. yes he is a danger to us.

2. yes he is a danger to his own people.

hers somemore questions to ask.

Q. is he a danger to Israel (one of our closest Allies)

A. yes, he is a danger to them, he destabalizes the region and is a terrorist himself becuse he encourages suicide bombers in Palisinian territories and pais them for their killing of innocent lives.

Q. Is he a threat to the rest of the Region by invading his neighbors?

A. yes, he has Invaded Kuwait and iran. and has threatened to invade Saudi Arabia

Q. so all in all does he have to disapear???

A. yes and the sooner the better wheather it be peacefuly or by force!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1. You can find anyone in the world and make an arguement that their a danger to us, when in reality its not likely...

2. We concur...

Q1. wtf cares if he is a danger to isreal? Again, you can make a claim that every muslim nation is a danger to isreal, that ain't no excuse to go to war...

Q2. Saddam may be a nut but he's not stupid, he knows if he even attempts to invade a country he's GONE in a sec... BTW, who was helping him in the whole Iran ordeal?

Q3. I'm no fan of Saddam, I'd love to see him disapear, but the fact is thats not our responsibility. The whole idea of "regime change" is rediculous... next thing you know we're gonna be running around everywhere replacing people we don't like...

its because alote of people are of the mind-set of Sheryl Crow the singer in that they believe that "war is ALWAYS bad" and that "we should try our hardest to have no emenies".

its just typical liberals living in La-La land who think that war is never the answer.
Gross generalization, I'm far from a pacifist, however, pointless wars are POINTLESS...
 
Jul 21, 2002
8,158
665
0
42
Oklahoma
www.youtube.com
#92
like i said before, the people of afghanistan where shit on when the taliban regime came into power. they had to give up alot of possessions such as their televisions, because the taliban didn't want them to see what's going on in the outside world. when we got rid of the Taliban, those people could actually live a little bit of life again. if you think getting rid of the taliban didn't make the people happy that don't support terrorism in their own country again, you are crazy.

whenever they show interview with local from other countries, of course they only show the ones who support whichever regime happens to be in power. the people of Iraq don't like saddam either and they wish he were gone.

i don't like war as much as anyone, but this shit needs to happen. surrounding countries, mostly arab countries actually, have been the ones to step up and say they will be the ones to take saddam out of IRAQ.

it is our problem, it is a problem of the world. while most countries hate us now for what is going on, i think it will come around later on when the see what is hopefully the progress that has been made to have peace among countries.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#93
Mcleanhatch said:


its because alote of people are of the mind-set of Sheryl Crow the singer in that they believe that "war is ALWAYS bad" and that "we should try our hardest to have no emenies".

its just typical liberals living in La-La land who think that war is never the answer.
ok i don't fucken get you, just cuase someone opposes an iraqwar
they are liberals a pacifists!?!


some one with there own minds, are "liberals" to you.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#94
nefar559 said:
some one with there own minds, are "liberals" to you.
no, there are people considered conservatives that have their own minds, there are people called liberatarians that have thier own minds, independants, ect............ the ones that i consider liberals are people with ideas of big government and people that come at you from the left