Floyd Mayweather vs Miguel Cotto, May 5th [MGM Las Vegas]

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

who takes it?


  • Total voters
    51
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#61
Cotto looked much better with his new trainer. I like his improved foot movement and head movement.
I wish some of you guys would appreciate the fighter rather than just trash them all the time.
At least we have a fight now...

If you don't think Cotto is one of the best in the world then I don't know what to tell you.
Go visit a boxing gym. Go study the art of fighting. Go throw some gloves on. You'll realize it soon enough...
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#62
why you making shit up? I just said "cotto is the best fight out there for floyd besides say martinez". what do you think that means dumb ass?

this is where you & I differ. I don't have to nuthug to the point where it blinds me. I can say Cotto is a very good fighter and at the same time say Floyd is going to destroy him. What does that say about my opinion of floyd? That he IS a great fighter obviously. I've always said floyd is an amazing fighter, hes one of the best fighters I've ever seen in my life. You on the otherhand have to discredit every single fighter and call them shot, old, etc., just like you said Cotto was shot for years.

Again, genius, my entire point is calling you out on your hypocrisy. You called Cotto shot, said Manny shouldn't get any credit. Now floyd is fighting Cotto and you couldn't be happier to see Floyd "destroy" Cotto. That is hypocritical.
Do you not understand how fucking dumb you sound. You are calling me a hypocrite because I want to see Cotto a fighter that I call overrated and damaged goods get beat up by a fighter that I actually like in Mayweather. Dude really you need to learn the meaning of a hypicrite dumbass. Please find and post one statement that I have praised Cotto or said that Cotto is a threat to beat Mayweather?? When you can find them statements you can call me a hyocrite DUMBFUCK. And you want to talk about making shit up. lol..
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#63
Let's talk about the fighter I have called damaged goods.

Cotto after Margarito and Clottley = Damaged Goods
Margarito after Cotto and Mosley = Damaged Goods
Paul Williams after Margarito and Martinez 1= Damaged Goods

It's funny how a lot of people were talking shit about me for calling them damaged fighters, but the fact of the matter is I was right on all accounts. Paul Williams, Margarito, and Cotto are not the same fighter they once were after those fights. Now tell me I'm lie Mr. Double Talk.
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#68
I'm pretty sure he's calling you a hypocrite because you slammed the Cotto fight when he fought Pacquiao but you love Mayweather fighting him. Because it seems to be perfectly fine for Mayweather to fight "damaged goods" but not Pacquiao. He's not calling you a hypocrite because you think Cotto's an amazing fighter, he's calling you a hypocrite because shit talking a fighter for fighting a man you consider to be less worthy and then praising a man for fighting that same fighter, whatever your reasons are .. is being a hypocrite.
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
41
#69
Let's talk about the fighter I have called damaged goods.

Cotto after Margarito and Clottley = Damaged Goods
Margarito after Cotto and Mosley = Damaged Goods
Paul Williams after Margarito and Martinez 1= Damaged Goods

It's funny how a lot of people were talking shit about me for calling them damaged fighters, but the fact of the matter is I was right on all accounts. Paul Williams, Margarito, and Cotto are not the same fighter they once were after those fights. Now tell me I'm lie Mr. Double Talk.

What's funny is that while your idol was on vacation, all of these guys were in there (including Pacquiao) beating the living shit out of each other. They all stayed in the game and took on the best (each other). How convenient of Floyd to come back after they've all "damaged" (in your words) each other.
 

BUTCHER 206

FREE BUTCHER206
Aug 22, 2003
12,316
109,201
113
Seattle, WA
#70
The same goes for if Pac loses to Bradley which is likely then Floyd will laugh at his ass. Got Em!!
Again ditto if Pac loses to Bradley so u aint sayin shit! Got Em!!
but like youve been saying in the other thread, "pac isnt on the same level as mayweather", so it wouldnt hold as much weight, since mayweather is "the bigger fighter". a mayweather loss, to a fighter deemed as "manny leftovers", isnt comparable to a "lesser boxer" losing to another "lesser boxer". it would be much more embarassing and hold more gravity in the boxing world, according to mayweather fan opinion



for the record i dont have a strong inclination toward supporting either floyd or manny; i think they need to leave their egos at home and bring the boxing world the fight theyve been craving for years
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#71
I'm pretty sure he's calling you a hypocrite because you slammed the Cotto fight when he fought Pacquiao but you love Mayweather fighting him. Because it seems to be perfectly fine for Mayweather to fight "damaged goods" but not Pacquiao. He's not calling you a hypocrite because you think Cotto's an amazing fighter, he's calling you a hypocrite because shit talking a fighter for fighting a man you consider to be less worthy and then praising a man for fighting that same fighter, whatever your reasons are .. is being a hypocrite.
Actually I would be a hypocrite if I hype up Mayweather win over Cotto again get your facts right before calling someone a hyocrite. All I have stated was that I will enjoy watching Cotto get beat-up by Mayweather nothing more nothing less. You and 206 are reaching with the hypocrite bullshit. But I understand you guys don't want to see Cotto get his ass kicked again. you both were just fighting with me talking about how Cotto is still a great fighter. Now it's time for Cotto to put up or shut up.

Please show me a comment where I praise Mayweather for fighting Cotto other then me saying I want to see Cotto get beat-up. If you can't show the comment I would like and Mr. double talk to shut the FUCK up about me being a hypocrite. I will be waiting for you guys to show a comment. lol
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#73
What's funny is that while your idol was on vacation, all of these guys were in there (including Pacquiao) beating the living shit out of each other. They all stayed in the game and took on the best (each other). How convenient of Floyd to come back after they've all "damaged" (in your words) each other.
That's fine and great those guys where not retired so they should've fought eachother right they are fighters? Look at it this way Mayweather fought ODLH and Hatton made the most money in his career about $60 - $70 million, so he took time off to enjoy himself with his friends, and family. But I forgot after Mayweather left Arum to go on to make the most money in his life, he was ducking the two Top Rank guys (Margarito, Cotto) right. LOL
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#74
so who isnt damaged goods?
That's a very easy question to answer a boxer that after a brutal battle in the ring comes back and fights at the same level in there next fight. Marquez vs. Manny for example they had a brutal war in the ring, both guys recovered and went on to fight at the same level. Now let's talk about Taylor vs. B-Hop they had a war in the ring, B-Hop went on to fight at the same level, but Taylor has never been the same again and can't fight at a high level anymore, so Taylor is damaged goods now. If a fighter is not fighting at the same level you fought at before, because of a beat they took inside the ring = damaged goods.
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#75
but like youve been saying in the other thread, "pac isnt on the same level as mayweather", so it wouldnt hold as much weight, since mayweather is "the bigger fighter". a mayweather loss, to a fighter deemed as "manny leftovers", isnt comparable to a "lesser boxer" losing to another "lesser boxer". it would be much more embarassing and hold more gravity in the boxing world, according to mayweather fan opinion

for the record i dont have a strong inclination toward supporting either floyd or manny; i think they need to leave their egos at home and bring the boxing world the fight theyve been craving for years
You are a 100% right. If Mayweather loses this fight he will never be able to live it down, being beat by a Manny leftover and I will be the 1st to clown him.
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#76
This is everything you hate in a Pacquiao fight. This guy is a "Pacquiao leftover" he's "damaged goods", they is clearly nothing good about this fight in everything you say about Pacquiao. The fact that you aren't petitioning in every thread that exists in this forum repeating the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over about how terrible this fight is, makes you a hypocrite. Deal with it man, it is what it is.

I'm not gonna get into a silly back and forth about it because I really don't care that much I was just stating the reason he'd be calling you a hypocrite.
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
41
#77
That's fine and great those guys where not retired so they should've fought eachother right they are fighters? Look at it this way Mayweather fought ODLH and Hatton made the most money in his career about $60 - $70 million, so he took time off to enjoy himself with his friends, and family. But I forgot after Mayweather left Arum to go on to make the most money in his life, he was ducking the two Top Rank guys (Margarito, Cotto) right. LOL

Why do your responses always involve money? What does it matter to you? You're not on the payroll.


My point is that you're saying that all these fighters are damaged and shot. Well, the reason is they did what they were SUPPOSED to do as fighters, and that was take on the best fighters in their division. Floyd left, for whatever reasons, and conveniently came back after all of these guys had went to war with each other.


Funny coincidence.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#78
Now let's talk about Taylor vs. B-Hop they had a war in the ring, B-Hop went on to fight at the same level, but Taylor has never been the same again and can't fight at a high level anymore, so Taylor is damaged goods now. If a fighter is not fighting at the same level you fought at before, because of a beat they took inside the ring = damaged goods.
I wouldn't really call Taylor damaged goods. He just isn't as good. More or less he was over hyped and got exposed by top caliber opponents. He's still a very very good fighter.

You have to think about it logically. Have you ever had your ass beat? Does that mean the next time you fight someone, if you get beat up again you're "damaged goods"? If you win does that mean that last beating you took didn't have an effect on you? It's a fight. Someone is going to lose. These are professional fighters.

Damaged goods is when you have an actual injury. Margarito's eye, Yuri Foreman's knee, Jeff Lacy's shoulder, etc.

You think Cotto is even thinking about his loss against Manny? He is far from damaged and as long as he is 100% healthy, he's just as good as he ever was if not better.
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#79
This is everything you hate in a Pacquiao fight. This guy is a "Pacquiao leftover" he's "damaged goods", they is clearly nothing good about this fight in everything you say about Pacquiao. The fact that you aren't petitioning in every thread that exists in this forum repeating the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over about how terrible this fight is, makes you a hypocrite. Deal with it man, it is what it is.

I'm not gonna get into a silly back and forth about it because I really don't care that much I was just stating the reason he'd be calling you a hypocrite.
So in other words you can't find a post of mines to support your bullshit hypocrite calms. If you didn't want to go back and forward then maybe you should've shut your fucking mouth in the 1st place my friend. You just tried to justify Mr. Double Talk and you got proved wrong don't get mad at me be mad at yourself for opening your trap.
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#80
Why do your responses always involve money? What does it matter to you? You're not on the payroll.


My point is that you're saying that all these fighters are damaged and shot. Well, the reason is they did what they were SUPPOSED to do as fighters, and that was take on the best fighters in their division. Floyd left, for whatever reasons, and conveniently came back after all of these guys had went to war with each other.


Funny coincidence.
So is it a coincidence that Manny only fought the losers of the wars? Margarito vs Cotto, Margarito vs Mosley, Mosley vs Mayweather is that a coincidence to that Manny fights the loser of the big fight. Lol too easy