David Carr chooses Carolina

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#21
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#21
Lamberto Quintero said:
No!

And the Raiders are stupid that they didnt get David Carr. And they're going to be stupid if they don't draft CJ. Just my opinion...
Click to expand...
CJ is deep but I am thinking that Adrian Peterson could end up being better. He's just as fast and he's a power running back. He's got the speed to run away from people and the power to run over cats.
 
Lamberto Quintero

Lamberto Quintero

Sicc OG
#22
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
#22
Tony said:
CJ is deep but I am thinking that Adrian Peterson could end up being better. He's just as fast and he's a power running back. He's got the speed to run away from people and the power to run over cats.
Click to expand...
I like AP too. I rather have AP or CJ over Russell right now. It just sucks that they passed up on Carr, they needed him on their team. Now they will probably end up getting your boy, which could be good or could be bad. It's a huge risk and if it fails, say hello to another 5 years of mediocre football coming out of oakland. :mad:
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#23
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#23
Lamberto Quintero said:
I like AP too. I rather have AP or CJ over Russell right now. It just sucks that they passed up on Carr, they needed him on their team. Now they will probably end up getting your boy, which could be good or could be bad. It's a huge risk and if it fails, say hello to another 5 years of mediocre football coming out of oakland. :mad:
Click to expand...
The Raiders still could select CJ. I think someone within the Raiders rated him an 11 out of 10. I think he visited this past Wednesday.
 
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#25
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#25
THEY DONT NEED PETERSON RIGHT NOW, THEY HAVE TO MANY RUNNING BACKS ALREADY. CJ WOULD BE DEFINITELY GOOD BUT WE HAVE TO GET RID OF MOSS FIRST. RUSSELL IS STILL THE BEST CHOICE TO ME CUZ HES THE BEST QB COMING OUT THE DRAFT IN A WHILE.
 
M

MooreBlock530

Sicc OG
#27
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#27
T-Rip said:
THEY DONT NEED PETERSON RIGHT NOW, THEY HAVE TO MANY RUNNING BACKS ALREADY. CJ WOULD BE DEFINITELY GOOD BUT WE HAVE TO GET RID OF MOSS FIRST. RUSSELL IS STILL THE BEST CHOICE TO ME CUZ HES THE BEST QB COMING OUT THE DRAFT IN A WHILE.
Click to expand...

what do you mean in a while? dude is not better then any of the top 3 QB picks last year......VY...MATT OR JAY....



well hes not prospected as better......time will tell if he actually plays better..



dont let his big arm fool you....
 
Solitary 1

Solitary 1

Moderator
#28
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
#28
T-Rip said:
THEY DONT NEED PETERSON RIGHT NOW, THEY HAVE TO MANY RUNNING BACKS ALREADY. CJ WOULD BE DEFINITELY GOOD BUT WE HAVE TO GET RID OF MOSS FIRST. RUSSELL IS STILL THE BEST CHOICE TO ME CUZ HES THE BEST QB COMING OUT THE DRAFT IN A WHILE.
Click to expand...

YOU CAN NEVER HAVE ENOUGH RUNNINGBACKS..
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#30
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#30
T-Rip said:
THEY DONT NEED PETERSON RIGHT NOW, THEY HAVE TOO MANY RUNNING BACKS ALREADY. CJ WOULD BE DEFINITELY GOOD BUT WE HAVE TO GET RID OF MOSS FIRST. RUSSELL IS STILL THE BEST CHOICE TO ME CUZ HES THE BEST QB COMING OUT THE DRAFT IN A WHILE.
Click to expand...
I agree with this. Our Qb situation is not good right now because all we have on our roster is Walter and Booty. I think we're ok in regards to running backs (with the recent signing of Dominic Rhodes) and receivers (since Moss is supposedly staying).... so in my opinion we gotta address the most important position on the field and that's Qb.
 
Lamberto Quintero

Lamberto Quintero

Sicc OG
#31
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
#31
Tony said:
I agree with this. Our Qb situation is not good right now because all we have on our roster is Walter and Booty. I think we're ok in regards to running backs (with the recent signing of Dominic Rhodes) and receivers (since Moss is supposedly staying).... so in my opinion we gotta address the most important position on the field and that's Qb.
Click to expand...
You're right, that's why I thought they should have signed Carr that way QB is taken care of and they could still get CJ. Now they NEED a QB, their options aren't as open to other team needs as they could have been.
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#32
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#32
^True dat... I think they should/could/would have went after Schaub but maybe Atlanta's asking price was too high.

I see what you're saying... they should have taken care of their qb situation before the draft so they wouldn't have to draft a qb with the first pick right?
 
thascary1

thascary1

Sicc OG
#38
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#38
MooreBlock530 said:
they didnt even bring carr in......thats what its kinda confussing....i guess they have some sort of "plan"
Click to expand...
the plan is to draft russell and all the worries of the world will go away!

Teams will not put pressure on the qb because the nfl will have a no blitx rule, and there will be no changing defenses at the line of scrimmage this way he doesn't get confused.
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#40
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#40
MooreBlock530 said:
they didnt even bring carr in......thats what its kinda confussing....i guess they have some sort of "plan"
Click to expand...
I could be wrong... but I think they didn't bring him in because he was satisfied with just holding a clipboard as opposed to challenging for a starting position. I think David wanted to be a back up regardless... The Raiders may have been looking for a starter or someone that could challenge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom