Caylee Anthony is Dead!!!
- Thread starter mocheezkc
- Start date
I watched a lot of this shit too. although the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that this bitch was a stupid lying bitch of a stupid whore, there was nothing that proved she did it. nothing I saw, at least.
but what mother doesn't go bat shit crazy if her child is missing for an hour? so there is some fucked up shit going on, for sure.
but what mother doesn't go bat shit crazy if her child is missing for an hour? so there is some fucked up shit going on, for sure.
I think it was something along the lines of what one of the analysts was saying on TV before...She wasnt watching the kid, she drowned in the pool, mom freaked, hid the body and ducked her family for a month. The made up people, and job, story, because she is a nut job. Possibly not to wanting the police to dig into her family past because theyre all screwed up too...Either way she's a bad mother who didnt deserve to have a kid, and deserves to pay for her negligence.
or what rasan wrote; she chloformed the kidd so she could whore around and killed that poor child by accident.
but why stage an accidental drowning as a murder? makes no sense, but this whole situation is bizarre and fucked.
my mom lost track of me in the mall for about forty five minutes and almost completely lost it. back in the day. so I just don't get it.
trying the death penalty on a purely circumstantial case was the problem, too.
but why stage an accidental drowning as a murder? makes no sense, but this whole situation is bizarre and fucked.
my mom lost track of me in the mall for about forty five minutes and almost completely lost it. back in the day. so I just don't get it.
trying the death penalty on a purely circumstantial case was the problem, too.
There was plenty of evidence.
Let's not forget the shovel she borrowed from her neighbor. The day Caylee went missing just happened to be the day her car was backed into the garage. The tape found on Caylee's mouth and nose was the same as the tape used to hang up her missing photos...and it was a rare brand.
Cadaver dogs hit on her trunk IMMEDIATELY! If there was no body in that trunk, the dogs wouldn't have gone ape shit over it.
The dogs ALONE eliminated REASONABLE doubt...
Let's not forget the shovel she borrowed from her neighbor. The day Caylee went missing just happened to be the day her car was backed into the garage. The tape found on Caylee's mouth and nose was the same as the tape used to hang up her missing photos...and it was a rare brand.
Cadaver dogs hit on her trunk IMMEDIATELY! If there was no body in that trunk, the dogs wouldn't have gone ape shit over it.
The dogs ALONE eliminated REASONABLE doubt...
to do what? electrocute people even if you CANT prove them guilty?
theres NO evidence she killed that girl. the prosecution cant even prove a homicide took place. its entirely possible she drowned. yes she probably did it or has knowledge of what happened but what proof do you have of it? NONE. thats why she walked.
some people are WAY too willing to give the government endless power. dumb fucks.
theres NO evidence she killed that girl. the prosecution cant even prove a homicide took place. its entirely possible she drowned. yes she probably did it or has knowledge of what happened but what proof do you have of it? NONE. thats why she walked.
some people are WAY too willing to give the government endless power. dumb fucks.
you're new to this legal stuff arent you? its NOT the defenses job to PROVE what really happened. the only job the defense has is to show that the alleged crime is subject to a reasonable amount of doubt. its reasonable to doubt if she really did it. if you dont think so, thank the same constitution for giving you the freedom of speech to talk out of your ass.
Actually, you're wrong. YOU must be new to the legal stuff. In the defense's opening statement, Baez said they were going to PROVE that the little girl in fact died of an accidental drowning. At that exact moment in time, the burden of proof was shifted to the defense. Look at the definition, my friend. This is the same reason the judge was pissed off at the defense attorney. They made a claim and failed to prove it.
burden of proof n. the most important rule of evidence in the trial of civil (not criminal) cases. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff (the party bringing the lawsuit) to show by a "preponderance of evidence" or "weight of evidence" that all the facts necessary to win a judgment are probably true. In a criminal trial the burden of proof is required of the prosecutor to prove the guilt of the accused is "beyond a reasonable doubt," a much more difficult hurdle. Unless there is a complete failure to present substantial evidence of a vital fact (usually called an "element of the cause of action"), the ultimate decision as to whether the plaintiff has met his/her burden of proof rests with the jury or the judge if there is no jury. However, the burden of proof is not always on the plaintiff. In some issues it may shift to the defendant if he/she raises a factual issue in defense
burden of proof n. the most important rule of evidence in the trial of civil (not criminal) cases. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff (the party bringing the lawsuit) to show by a "preponderance of evidence" or "weight of evidence" that all the facts necessary to win a judgment are probably true. In a criminal trial the burden of proof is required of the prosecutor to prove the guilt of the accused is "beyond a reasonable doubt," a much more difficult hurdle. Unless there is a complete failure to present substantial evidence of a vital fact (usually called an "element of the cause of action"), the ultimate decision as to whether the plaintiff has met his/her burden of proof rests with the jury or the judge if there is no jury. However, the burden of proof is not always on the plaintiff. In some issues it may shift to the defendant if he/she raises a factual issue in defense
Bullshit. Scott Peterson killed his wife and his baby. Solid evidence or not, that dude was saying his wife was gone before she was gone. His crying was also fake...and he didn't do shit to "find" his wife.
Sorry...you love somebody you will break your neck trying to find them. You will also lose your god damn mind when you can't. My girl's friend went missing in San Diego a few days ago and his wife was on the news the next day crying her eyes out begging everybody to help find him.
Sorry...you love somebody you will break your neck trying to find them. You will also lose your god damn mind when you can't. My girl's friend went missing in San Diego a few days ago and his wife was on the news the next day crying her eyes out begging everybody to help find him.
if you think she didnt have something to do with her babys death than your stupid as fuck. 30 days and no calls to the cops reallly???????? than her mom lies about using her computer when they prove she was at work at the time. and the fake nanny.
that whore did it. this just proves how stupid america is
that whore did it. this just proves how stupid america is
the burden of proof ultimately rested on the prosecution. maybe you missed the whole NOT GUILTY thing today. it wasnt because the defense PROVED caylee drowned. it was because the PROSECUTION DIDNT MEET THE BURDEN OF PROOF.
scott peterson was also convicted with less than adequate evidence. in both cases i am of the opinion that the defendants were guilty and also that they should have been found not guilty. just my opinion. i dont like the government allowing people to electrocute people based on gut feelings. sorry. that just aint american.
scott peterson was also convicted with less than adequate evidence. in both cases i am of the opinion that the defendants were guilty and also that they should have been found not guilty. just my opinion. i dont like the government allowing people to electrocute people based on gut feelings. sorry. that just aint american.
No, she was found not guilty because the jury was a bunch of morons. They had more than enough to convict her. Waaaaaay more than enough to convict her. Like I said, the cadaver dogs, the duct tape, the lies, etc. etc.
How did little Caylee get in the field? They blamed the guy who found her. It's clear as day the little girl's body was in the trunk.
There was no gut instinct about it...we all know she did it just like we all know OJ and Scott Peterson did it. To each his own, though.
How did little Caylee get in the field? They blamed the guy who found her. It's clear as day the little girl's body was in the trunk.
There was no gut instinct about it...we all know she did it just like we all know OJ and Scott Peterson did it. To each his own, though.
im not saying she didnt do it. im saying that the duct tape was not IRREFUTABLE evidence. the dogs are not IRREFUTABLE evidence. the lies are not IRREFUTABLE evidence.
the caylee drowning theme was genius simply because it exposed the fact that there was no solid evidence she was murdered by her mother. it forced the prosecution to prove without a doubt their specific theory was true beyond a reasonable doubt. they didnt do it.
scott peterson was railroaded. do i feel sorry for him? no. i just dont think the burden of proof was met, especially for the death penalty which is barbaric to begin with.
the caylee drowning theme was genius simply because it exposed the fact that there was no solid evidence she was murdered by her mother. it forced the prosecution to prove without a doubt their specific theory was true beyond a reasonable doubt. they didnt do it.
scott peterson was railroaded. do i feel sorry for him? no. i just dont think the burden of proof was met, especially for the death penalty which is barbaric to begin with.