Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, will it happen?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Will Mayweather vs. Pacquiao ever happen?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 43.6%
  • No

    Votes: 10 25.6%
  • Who the hell knows at this point?

    Votes: 12 30.8%

  • Total voters
    39
Status
Not open for further replies.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Chris Algeri sucks...he is physically weak...the only way he will win a fight against solid competition is in retreat. I got a question...who has been knocked out more times in their career...Paulie the Magic Man Malignaggi or Manny Pacman Pacquaio?
Lol that's a pretty retarded thing to ask considering Pac was knocked out twice as a teenager when he was a malnourished poor kid. He went the next 14 years not getting KO'd, obviously against much greater opposition. You already know they've both been stopped three times. So I guess if we go by that, it means Paulie is better than Roberto Duran who was KO'd 4 times. Paulie>>>>Duran.

I got a question for you: who was the best opponent Paulie beat? One fight away from retirement Juan Diaz? Or shot to shit Judah? Paulie has never beat a good opponent, he loses all of them. Khan stopped him, Porter stopped him, Hatton stopped him, Cotto whooped him, Broner beat him , fucking Pablo Cano beat him. every time the guy steps up he got his ass kicked.
 
Last edited:
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
So now we are in here praising Algeri and how good of a fighter he is?? LMAO! That dude is a bum of bums lol. Paulie would beat the shit out of him. Atleast a prime Paulie anyway. Algeri is booboo. Now lets get back to the real topic and not waste time on scrubs lol. Got Em!!
Paulie has never beat the shit out of anyone in his life. He can outbox guys, but he's not beating the shit out of anyone in the ring. Be realistic here. If Paulie and Chris fought they could market it as a Pillow Fight.
 
Mar 18, 2008
2,009
1,569
0
46
Lol that's a pretty retarded thing to ask considering Pac was knocked out twice as a teenager when he was a malnourished poor kid. He went the next 14 years not getting KO'd, obviously against much greater opposition. You already know they've both been stopped three times. So I guess if we go by that, it means Paulie is better than Roberto Duran who was KO'd 4 times. Paulie>>>>Duran.

I got a question for you: who was the best opponent Paulie beat? One fight away from retirement Juan Diaz? Or shot to shit Judah? Paulie has never beat a good opponent, he loses all of them. Khan stopped him, Porter stopped him, Hatton stopped him, Cotto whooped him, Broner beat him , fucking Pablo Cano beat him. every time the guy steps up he got his ass kicked.
Is there a difference between TKO and KO?
 
Props: CZAR and CZAR
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
On a serious note, and assuming Pac vs PBF isn't made, Amir Khan is actively seeking out a Floyd fight but said he wants Pac if he can't get Floyd. Which begs the question who would you rather see?

Mayweather vs Khan
Pacquiao vs Khan

Which would be a more exciting fight? Which would the more interesting fight?

(For those wondering, Khan currently has no contract with Showtime and Oscar said he can fight on HBO so there).
 
Mar 18, 2008
2,009
1,569
0
46
Hmm I don't know Bay Area, is there?

Is there a difference between a hall of famer and a journeyman?
Not much difference in terms of being KO'd...lol. Aight Imma let it go...Mayweather should offer Cotto $5 million step aside money for May 2nd. Bob Arum will launch a tampering lawsuit. Mayweather will contend that Cotto hadn't signed a contract for that date to fight Canelo and is still free to negotiate a fight with Floyd or step aside. Arum will then refuse to give up Pacquiao for May 2nd stating Mayweather will not bully us into a fight. "Fuck Mayweather we don't need him...Pacquiao will be fighting Jesse Vargas April 2015...since Floyd is a coward."
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
Roy was a beast in his prime but he became boring himself after getting KO'd by Tarver. I remember the 3rd Tarver fight (correct me if I am wrong) he wouldn't let his hands go.

As for Floyd vs Miadana being boring, the only boring part of that fight was round 12 in the 2nd fight. Mayweather literally ran, I'll admit that.

Mayweather won't get credit for being an exciting "fighter" until he gets beat up and bloodied, then the critics will say what a great fight. So is Mayweather still in his prime while Pacquiao isn't? We've seen some exciting fights from Floyd... Chico (RIP), Gatti (RIP), Zab Judah was a good one.
 
Last edited:
Feb 10, 2006
8,173
6,523
113
40
On a serious note, and assuming Pac vs PBF isn't made, Amir Khan is actively seeking out a Floyd fight but said he wants Pac if he can't get Floyd. Which begs the question who would you rather see?

Mayweather vs Khan
Pacquiao vs Khan

Which would be a more exciting fight? Which would the more interesting fight?

(For those wondering, Khan currently has no contract with Showtime and Oscar said he can fight on HBO so there).


Pac would bring it to Khan, Floyd would lay bacc and counter Khan the whole time. Exciting would be Pac v Khan on the strength of it being a brawl cuz Amir loves to bang too. Floyd and Khan would be a chess match with speed and counter punching being involved the whole 12 rounds.



So having said that i would actually like to see Khan v Mayweather.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Roy was a beast in his prime but he became boring himself and getting KO'd by Tarver. I remember the 3rd Tarver fight (correct me if I am wrong) he wouldn't let his hands go.
He was quite obviously past prime during the 3rd Tarver fight. He was past prime when he was KO'd by Tarver.

The guy essentially went 50-0 (the DQ loss he suffered was because he KO'd a guy then punched him again when he was on the ground). Hit the age of 35 after moving down from heavyweight, his reflexes weren't the same anymore and that was a wrap. But during those years before he got old, he was certainly entertaining and something special to watch.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
I actually don't find Floyd boring to watch. For me, the excitement when he fights comes from how he avoids punches, how he counters and how when he starts to feel really comfortable he starts lighting you up and trying to walk you down. For Pac, I like the angles, he's always punching, he is countering and you never know what to expect because he can be very explosive.

But, for Roy, he is saying what he is saying but now we have to bring up his history with Hopkins.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Roy fought Hopkins though. The only debate is a rematch after Hopkins beat Trinidad however they weren't in the same weight class like Pac and Floyd, Roy was at 168 if not 175 by then Hopkins still at 160. And Roy did offer Hopkins 60/40 but Hopkins said if he has to move up two weight classes he wants 50/50 and it died there. Until they were both 90 years old which was one of the worst fights in history, I'm sure the same will happen Floyd will be 47 Pacquiao 46 and no one will give a fuck lol
 
Last edited:

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
Roy fought Hopkins though.
And this is my point. Why so long for a rematch? Some argue that the fight was closer than the scores showed and some people thought Hopkins was the clear winner. Why so long for a rematch?

The only debate is a rematch after Hopkins beat Trinidad however they weren't in the same weight class like Pac and Floyd, Roy was at 168 if not 175 by then Hopkins still at 160. And Roy did offer Hopkins 60/40 but Hopkins said if he has to move up two weight classes he wants 50/50 and it died there. Until they were both 90 years old which was one of the worst fights in history, I'm sure the same will happen Floyd will be 47 Pacquiao 46 lol
See above. Both guys had what around 20 or so fights under their belts at the time they first fought? Again, why not an immediate rematch?
 
Props: CZAR and CZAR
Status
Not open for further replies.