That isn't effective aggressiveness. For one, in order to cut the ring off you're going to have to have faster feet/legs and you're going to have to trap the guy. The second problem is with the punch count. You're saying to throw that high of a number and be accurate, while effectively stopping one of the best defensive fighters in the modern era, from moving--no dice.
Oscar: Landed 21% of his punches. Total punch count was 587 while Floyd was at 481 and 43%.
Maidana (first fight no need to go into the second one): 858 punches with 221 landing for 25%. Floyd had 426 punches with 230 landing for 50%.
Castillo (first fight no need to go into the second one): 506 thrown by Castillo and landing 40%. Floyd throws 448 for 35%.
Hopefully you see the pattern here and why a thousand punch count is clearly out of the question. You are not going to throw 1000 punches against Floyd AND effectively cut off the ring. You can throw a lot of punches on the ropes but how many of those punches are effective punches? He's slipping, he's parrying the punches, using his glove and rolling his shoulder. In other words, he isn't taking damage like another person in a similar situation would.
And if you look at Floyds fights against Canelo and Cotto or pretty much anyone recently, and look at the punch count, you'll see he will actually hit 500-600 while the opponent has fewer throws and a lower percentage.
So looking at the numbers, it's a bit more complicated because Floyd is adjusting his numbers.
Simply put, there is no plan to beat the guy because it would have been done already.
Oscar: Landed 21% of his punches. Total punch count was 587 while Floyd was at 481 and 43%.
Maidana (first fight no need to go into the second one): 858 punches with 221 landing for 25%. Floyd had 426 punches with 230 landing for 50%.
Castillo (first fight no need to go into the second one): 506 thrown by Castillo and landing 40%. Floyd throws 448 for 35%.
Hopefully you see the pattern here and why a thousand punch count is clearly out of the question. You are not going to throw 1000 punches against Floyd AND effectively cut off the ring. You can throw a lot of punches on the ropes but how many of those punches are effective punches? He's slipping, he's parrying the punches, using his glove and rolling his shoulder. In other words, he isn't taking damage like another person in a similar situation would.
And if you look at Floyds fights against Canelo and Cotto or pretty much anyone recently, and look at the punch count, you'll see he will actually hit 500-600 while the opponent has fewer throws and a lower percentage.
So looking at the numbers, it's a bit more complicated because Floyd is adjusting his numbers.
Simply put, there is no plan to beat the guy because it would have been done already.
I agree just throwing 1000 punches isn't the answer, but Castillo should have won that fight and it was due to effective aggression and ring generalship. Hell, Maidana nearly won in the first fight and he's a b level fighter. If he was more skilled, Floyd very well could have lost. If there was a Roberto Duran around fighting that version of Floyd I don't see Floyd winning that night. But the quality right now at 147 and 154 are all B level guys. Pacquiao was elite, not sure about now. No one at the moment is really great, we got Amir Khan, Thurman, Devon Alexander, Bradley, Porter, etc. good solid fighters but none I would consider great or elite.
there are a number of plans that can work against Floyd but the talent of the fighters aren't good enough. Hell, Maidana nearly beat Floyd in the first fight and he's a B level fighter.
Last edited: