Boxing News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
Hahahaa dude u are to much. It doesnt matter what I think, whats gonna happen is gonna happen anyway so lets just enjoy it.
Fallacy. Yes, what is going to happen is going to happen but you never had a problem with sharing your opinion before so why now? When asked if Broner was going to win this fight or that fight you shared what you were thinking. With Floyd vs Pac you shared what you were thinking, why stop now?

Im tired of going over the same shit and beating a dead horse. It is what it is. I will watch whoever Floyd decides to fight and enjoy while it last because he wont be around much longer and to me he is the G.O.A.T. Got Em!
Fallacy. None of this has anything to do with what you've been asked. You made the claims that the guy was unknown and now you are tired of going over the same shit and beating a dead horse? You seem to not comprehend the fact that what you're saying is illogical at best and shows your bias.

Bottom line is this, should the committee strip Floyd of his belt if he doesn't fight his mandatory? That is a closed ended question, in other words, a yes or no question. You say you're a Floyd fan, and you claim to be a fan of the sport, so I'm asking you a simple yes or no question. Should he be stripped of his belt if he doesn't fight his mandatory?
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
51
Didn't Broner lose a belt on the scale, tho? I've always said Rios and Broner fight dudes smaller and now they move up and can't do shit.
No Broner never lost a belt on the scale. His missed weight once. Got Em!!

Gavin Rees was way smaller than Broner for one. Broner was able to make weight, fine. But when people talk about GGG or Martinez moving down to fight Floyd at 154 all we get is excuses. "They are too big, why don't they move up to fight someone else?" Yet it's okay for Broner to fight at 135, or fight at 135 and blatantly miss the weight altogether which is even worse.
Dude Broner was at 130 and fought like once or twice at 135. He was fighting in his right division. Just because Rees is shorter doesnt mean he is smaller. Its not Broner's fault that Rees is fighting at 135. If he is so small then he shouldnt be in that division but Broner was fighting in his right division. Got Em!!

Fallacy. Yes, what is going to happen is going to happen but you never had a problem with sharing your opinion before so why now? When asked if Broner was going to win this fight or that fight you shared what you were thinking. With Floyd vs Pac you shared what you were thinking, why stop now?



Fallacy. None of this has anything to do with what you've been asked. You made the claims that the guy was unknown and now you are tired of going over the same shit and beating a dead horse? You seem to not comprehend the fact that what you're saying is illogical at best and shows your bias.

Bottom line is this, should the committee strip Floyd of his belt if he doesn't fight his mandatory? That is a closed ended question, in other words, a yes or no question. You say you're a Floyd fan, and you claim to be a fan of the sport, so I'm asking you a simple yes or no question. Should he be stripped of his belt if he doesn't fight his mandatory?
Dude u are hella funny. No Floyd should not be stripped. Has Sergio or Kid Chocolate fought their mandatories? Will Maidana fight his mandatory? Should they all be stripped? Cmon dude. Got Em!!
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
No Broner never lost a belt on the scale. His missed weight once. Got Em!!



Dude Broner was at 130 and fought like once or twice at 135. He was fighting in his right division. Just because Rees is shorter doesnt mean he is smaller. Its not Broner's fault that Rees is fighting at 135. If he is so small then he shouldnt be in that division but Broner was fighting in his right division. Got Em!!



Dude u are hella funny. No Floyd should not be stripped. Has Sergio or Kid Chocolate fought their mandatories? Will Maidana fight his mandatory? Should they all be stripped? Cmon dude. Got Em!!
Funny you mention Martinez. The 154 pound title Floyd owns was stripped from Martinez and given to Canelol. Why? Because the WBC said Martinez cannot be champion at both 154 and 160, so they stripped him of the WBC 154 title. Meanwhile Floyd still has titles in two weight classes.
 
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
43
Well it seems that might happen to Floyd if he doesn't fight Manny/Bradley winner come September. Plus, Broner did lose the title on the scale vs Escobedo. Thanks CZAR @CZAR for making me do my homework
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
Funny you mention Martinez. The 154 pound title Floyd owns was stripped from Martinez and given to Canelol. Why? Because the WBC said Martinez cannot be champion at both 154 and 160, so they stripped him of the WBC 154 title. Meanwhile Floyd still has titles in two weight classes.
It's not Floyd's fault they stripped Martinez and gave it to Canelo. Floyd just beats everyone, can't be mad at him. He's perfect and can do no wrong no matter what he does!!! I don't care if he gets knocked out by Paulie Malignaggi, he's the greatest ever!!! This game is about money, I don't care if he fights a meaningless fight against Khan and regularly doesn't fight the best!!! Got em!!!!!!
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
I don't have the pic, but I guess Lara called out GGG. Not sure it could really happen unless Golden Boy worked out a deal to have Lara on HBO (which actually shouldn't be impossible to make despite the cold war since GGG isn't with Top Rank). I love the fight and it would solve a lot of questions about both guys right now.

I also think that if GGG can make 154 to fight Floyd, he should consider moving down. There's better fighters there right now in my opinion. Even if he KO's Martinez or Cotto, then what?