Eats your words!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
TRAJIK1

TRAJIK1

Sicc OG
#1
Jun 24, 2005
11,754
460
83
39
www.MYSPACE.COM
#1
This might come back to bite me in the ass, but, post up some of the ridiculous claims you heard this off-season, that have proven to be otherwise!

Tony said:
Yeah he's biased, I mean how could he have Vernon Davis edging out Zach Miller when he even admits that Vernon isn't reliable at catching? All Vernon has on Zach is speed that's it. He drops some of the easiest catches, my 12 year old son has better hands than Vernon Davis.
Click to expand...
Tony said:
I disagree, I think we'll have a better year/record than Frisco because we have our starting qb in place with no controversies. The Niners offense is going to take a serious dip, while ours gets better. JR is experienced now, McFadden should be more involved in our offense, and hopefully Walker can stay healthy. We should definetly place 2nd in the AFC West and fight for a wild card. If we can stop LT from visiting the end zone so much, we may even place 1st. Thank god, Rob Ryan is gone.

The Niners won't make the playoffs next year!
Click to expand...
The Bold was true lol

Tony said:
I am being realistic, we're going to the playoffs this year.
Click to expand...
Tony said:
And don't forget to laugh at Vernon "alligator arms" Davis being ranked higher than Zach Miller...
Click to expand...
Tony said:
^Teams gameplan for Vernon Davis? Yeah right, you act like he's Antonio Gates. Teams don't gameplan for Davis. He maybe a threat to stretch the field and that's just because of his speed. Here are their statistics for 2008 and you tell me who's "stretching" the field.

Vernon Davis= 31 receptions, 358 yards, 11.5 average, 2 TD's
Zach Miller= 56 receptions, 778 yards, 13.9 average, 1 TD

Well if you can't say the same for Miller, then why did he "double" the yardage that Vernon put up in Martz's offense? And why does Miller average more yards per catch?
Click to expand...

3VID3NC3 said:
Miller is also a better blocking TE than Davis.
Click to expand...
Joey said:
Zack miller can block and catch.....He is better than both of your tight ends hands down.....
Click to expand...
Solitary 1 said:
WHICH DOESN'T PROVE SHIT. MILLER IS BETTER. PERIOD.
Click to expand...
Meta4iCAL said:
Miller >>>> Davis /thread
Click to expand...
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#2
Dec 7, 2005
32,357
13,838
113
38
#2
lol @ this 1

Originally Posted by Tony View Post
^Teams gameplan for Vernon Davis? Yeah right, you act like he's Antonio Gates. Teams don't gameplan for Davis. He maybe a threat to stretch the field and that's just because of his speed. Here are their statistics for 2008 and you tell me who's "stretching" the field.

Vernon Davis= 31 receptions, 358 yards, 11.5 average, 2 TD's
Zach Miller= 56 receptions, 778 yards, 13.9 average, 1 TD

Well if you can't say the same for Miller, then why did he "double" the yardage that Vernon put up in Martz's offense? And why does Miller average more yards per catch?


thats the best 1 there lol...



apparently VD = Gates. check the record lol
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#9
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#9
This Tony prediction is still one of my all time favorites:

Tony said:
Yeah I am picking Alfonzo Gomez to upset Cotto as well. Styles make fights and Gomez has the style to beat Cotto. Should be a good bloody fight.
Click to expand...

Tony said:
He (Gomez) doesn't fight going backwards. He comes forward and he's going to beat Cotto because of his style. Cotto feasted on Zab because he fought going backwards.... Shane Mosely gave Cotto a good fight especially when he decided to come forward. We'll see but I am picking Gomez to pull off the upset.... plus he's taller too.
Click to expand...
 
FATAL NYGHTMARE

FATAL NYGHTMARE

Sicc OG
#10
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#10
We'll see much of the same going into next season.

I see no reason for optimism in Oakland, but trust me, "they will be going to the playoffs and they will be better than the Niners" just like they do/are every year. Each individual player on their team will be better than whoever the Niners have at that position, as usual. Just like QB this year.

According to their fans, that is.
 
BROWN GUERRERO

BROWN GUERRERO

#SFUNITE
#15
Feb 12, 2004
7,488
886
0
38
#15
here are some more epic raider fan gems LOL!!

radiostationrep said:
you fucking losers. you will start the season 1-7.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahaahahahahaha!
Click to expand...
radiostationrep said:
i'm saying the niners arent any better than the raiders no matter how much you guys want to lie to yourself. i'm saying the raiders look to be in a better position going into this year. i'm saying the raiders have addressed needs this offseason. i'm saying you guys will suck.
Click to expand...
radiostationrep said:
the raiders will have a better record than the niners.
Click to expand...
 
Meta4iCAL

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
#17
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#17
as far as Zach Miller being better than Vernon Davis, that wasn't delusional at the beginning of the season... Davis had a breakout year... and is one of the best TE's in the league right now

but before the season Miller was the better TE... so at the time what I said was valid

and Miller is still solid as fuck.. Vernon Davis just played out of his mind this year
 
radiostationrep

radiostationrep

Sicc OG
#19
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#19
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
We'll see much of the same going into next season.

I see no reason for optimism in Oakland, but trust me, "they will be going to the playoffs and they will be better than the Niners" just like they do/are every year. Each individual player on their team will be better than whoever the Niners have at that position, as usual. Just like QB this year.

According to their fans, that is.
Click to expand...
you guys improved by a whole game this year. wow! the niners STILL havent made the playoffs as long as the raiders. but i guess some settle for crumbs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom