Would U vote 4 Bush if he were 2 run for re-election?
- Thread starter miggidy
- Start date
because theyre political idealologies are simply and better suited for ALL americans based on individualism not on pitting people from different income classes and races against each other like the democrats do
OK look how can any tax cut help the poor??? it cant you know why because poor people pay very little to no taxes.
and yes they do help the middle class. here is an example of bush tax cut that was signed in last year.
Estate Tax-- bush fought to get rid of it yet the democrats/liberals fought tooth and nail to stop it calling it a tax break for the rich. which of course is a lie. and here is why. if you were to inherit a house from a deceased father/mother under the estate tax you would have to pay a huge %age (dont know exactly but i think somewhere near 50%) in taxes in order to transfer it to your name. so if you are poor how can you inherit the house??? if you have to pay approximately $50,000 and you dont have any money????
and i suppose democrats/liberals dont try to keep the rich in power. let me tell you something about the few democrats that are going to run flr president against bush
1. Senator Edwards-----> he is a hundred millionair former trial lawyer that has through his frivilous lawsuits driven everybodies healthcare through the roof because it is hard for doctors to pay $170,000 in malprictice insurence
2. Senator Clinton---> besides the fact that people have said that they have heard her using racial slurs towards people of jewish decent. and she is on the record for making a racial slur towards political opponant Alfonso D'Amato and all italians. but we must not forget WHITEWATER
3. Senator John Kerry------> Richest man in the senate, house of reps, and the white house
4.
OK look how can any tax cut help the poor??? it cant you know why because poor people pay very little to no taxes.
and yes they do help the middle class. here is an example of bush tax cut that was signed in last year.
Estate Tax-- bush fought to get rid of it yet the democrats/liberals fought tooth and nail to stop it calling it a tax break for the rich. which of course is a lie. and here is why. if you were to inherit a house from a deceased father/mother under the estate tax you would have to pay a huge %age (dont know exactly but i think somewhere near 50%) in taxes in order to transfer it to your name. so if you are poor how can you inherit the house??? if you have to pay approximately $50,000 and you dont have any money????
and i suppose democrats/liberals dont try to keep the rich in power. let me tell you something about the few democrats that are going to run flr president against bush
1. Senator Edwards-----> he is a hundred millionair former trial lawyer that has through his frivilous lawsuits driven everybodies healthcare through the roof because it is hard for doctors to pay $170,000 in malprictice insurence
2. Senator Clinton---> besides the fact that people have said that they have heard her using racial slurs towards people of jewish decent. and she is on the record for making a racial slur towards political opponant Alfonso D'Amato and all italians. but we must not forget WHITEWATER
3. Senator John Kerry------> Richest man in the senate, house of reps, and the white house
4.
And who is to say that the NY Times and the LA times and the other MAJOR publications that your talking about haven't been bought out by the Bush admin. to once again cover up what they did? Show me some credable evidence that those publishers are completely unbiased and uncorupt and I'll believe it. but I think Bush and his family are corupt as fuck and they are one of the worst things that has ever happened to this country.
Personally I believe the smaller publishers because those are not the ones that get bought out with money.
------
About Kerry's reputation I dont see anything wrong with his views what-so-ever
1. Abortion should be a woman's choice. I had a sister that was born with brain damage and died when she was eleven. My mom saw her doctors and has never been a drug user, but she got pnuemonia while she was pregnant. During my sisters life we loved her very much, but she racked up almost 1.5 million dollars in healthcare costs and doctors bills from Stanford. Now if a woman that does use drugs gets pregnant and knows that she won't be able to make a good life for that child, plus she is not willing to give up drugs during pregnancy, raising the chance of birth-defects i think she should be able to make her own decision. Other reasons are rape- who wants to raise a child that constantly reminds you of a terrible experience. Child-molestation- self explanitory. If my mom got pregnant again and the child was going to be disabled again I would not hold it against her if she chose not to go through all the pain and sufferein again. extreme poverty.
2. Tax Raises - I was watching CNN yesterday and they were talking about the stimulus package bush is getting ready for . they showed some statistics about how americans feel about tax raises. 68% WANT TAX RAISES because it would help the economy. Just because someone says hes gonna raise taxes doesn't mean its a permanent thing once the economy is stable he could easily cut them back a little.
3.FUCK SUV'S AND TRUCKS- those pieces of shit are just ruining our environment. The only people that it makes safer are the people in them. And I can't tell you how FUCKIN TIRED i am of seeing these little four foot ten, 98 lbs women climb into montrosities BY THEMSELVES and drive like bats out of hell. They roll over, if they hit a car smaller than them (Normally the driver of the SUV's fault ..See above statement) its fatal. I dont see anything good about them. Unless, 1. you have 3-5 kids. 2. You use it to tow a boat or trailer. 3. you coach a team. 4. using it for activities and hauling. 5. you live off road
In the words of someone on Grand Theft Auto III.
"I live alone and commute two miles to work every morning, so of course I need a vehicle that can seat twelve and is equipt to travel across arctic tundra"
BULLSHIT
Personally I believe the smaller publishers because those are not the ones that get bought out with money.
------
About Kerry's reputation I dont see anything wrong with his views what-so-ever
1. Abortion should be a woman's choice. I had a sister that was born with brain damage and died when she was eleven. My mom saw her doctors and has never been a drug user, but she got pnuemonia while she was pregnant. During my sisters life we loved her very much, but she racked up almost 1.5 million dollars in healthcare costs and doctors bills from Stanford. Now if a woman that does use drugs gets pregnant and knows that she won't be able to make a good life for that child, plus she is not willing to give up drugs during pregnancy, raising the chance of birth-defects i think she should be able to make her own decision. Other reasons are rape- who wants to raise a child that constantly reminds you of a terrible experience. Child-molestation- self explanitory. If my mom got pregnant again and the child was going to be disabled again I would not hold it against her if she chose not to go through all the pain and sufferein again. extreme poverty.
2. Tax Raises - I was watching CNN yesterday and they were talking about the stimulus package bush is getting ready for . they showed some statistics about how americans feel about tax raises. 68% WANT TAX RAISES because it would help the economy. Just because someone says hes gonna raise taxes doesn't mean its a permanent thing once the economy is stable he could easily cut them back a little.
3.FUCK SUV'S AND TRUCKS- those pieces of shit are just ruining our environment. The only people that it makes safer are the people in them. And I can't tell you how FUCKIN TIRED i am of seeing these little four foot ten, 98 lbs women climb into montrosities BY THEMSELVES and drive like bats out of hell. They roll over, if they hit a car smaller than them (Normally the driver of the SUV's fault ..See above statement) its fatal. I dont see anything good about them. Unless, 1. you have 3-5 kids. 2. You use it to tow a boat or trailer. 3. you coach a team. 4. using it for activities and hauling. 5. you live off road
In the words of someone on Grand Theft Auto III.
"I live alone and commute two miles to work every morning, so of course I need a vehicle that can seat twelve and is equipt to travel across arctic tundra"
BULLSHIT
last time i checked i was the only1 supporting bush and i am not white i am MEXICAN 100%!!!! so i dont know who you are directing that statement at
ya, maybe 9-11 had something to do with it?????????? and we are at an all time moral values low after being hit with "Mr. No Morals" Bill Clinton for 8 long years.........
ya, maybe 9-11 had something to do with it?????????? and we are at an all time moral values low after being hit with "Mr. No Morals" Bill Clinton for 8 long years.........
they are liberal newspapers that cater to the democratic party and to liberal views and ideas.
now the idea that the CIA was involved in something so devastating was first brought up not by Gary Webb of the San Jose Mercury News but was Published By now Democrat Senator John Kerry. but it was Gary Webb who picked up thew story and ran with it.
now seeing that this was brought up by a democrat ( a powerful one at that) and yet the liberal mainstream media didnt side with the conspiricy theory should lead one to speculate that something is false within the repost.
i mean its kinda like if president bush was to disagree with Rush Limbaugh. knowing that they have the same political idealogies yet having a major disagreement should raise some eyes that somebody is wrong. now thats what was going on with this story why did the press (which has political views the same as the democrats) side with the CIA by totally discrediting the story. and dont say bush had influence over them because at the time of the retraction Bill Clinton (who has in the past said he LOATHES the military) and has consistantly cut the CIA's budget under his presidency was the president
now the idea that the CIA was involved in something so devastating was first brought up not by Gary Webb of the San Jose Mercury News but was Published By now Democrat Senator John Kerry. but it was Gary Webb who picked up thew story and ran with it.
now seeing that this was brought up by a democrat ( a powerful one at that) and yet the liberal mainstream media didnt side with the conspiricy theory should lead one to speculate that something is false within the repost.
i mean its kinda like if president bush was to disagree with Rush Limbaugh. knowing that they have the same political idealogies yet having a major disagreement should raise some eyes that somebody is wrong. now thats what was going on with this story why did the press (which has political views the same as the democrats) side with the CIA by totally discrediting the story. and dont say bush had influence over them because at the time of the retraction Bill Clinton (who has in the past said he LOATHES the military) and has consistantly cut the CIA's budget under his presidency was the president
well im sorry to hear about your sister. and i would probly have to say that that is probly one of the few exceptions where abortion should be allowed.
1. i believe it should be allowed in cases like your sisters if the family agrees it wants to do so
2. in the case of rape/sexual abuse/incest abortion should be allowed
but those cases are very rare and the majority of abortion cases are simply done out of convenience to the mother. i mean think about this what is more important a womans convenience or the killing of an INNOCENT UNBORN BABY.
and to take it a step farther what the difference between a mother having an abortion 2 months before delivery date and her killing her baby two months after it is born??????
agreed
how is raising taxes going to stimulate the economy???? how is taking money out of rich peoples hands going to encourage them to go out and hire more people and to expand their businesses??? how is raising taxes for middle class people going to encourage them to go spend more money on good when they have less money to start of each month. i mean i dont know if the economy has you penny pinching but for the sake of arguement lets say it is. how is taking more money from your paycheck going to encourage you to go spend more???? and well as far as i know poor people pay LITTLE TO NO TAXES anyway!
i mean am i the only one here who thinks the government has no business taking that much money from people.
oh and about the poll are you sure it wasnt that they were IN FAVOR of a tax cut??????
1. i believe it should be allowed in cases like your sisters if the family agrees it wants to do so
2. in the case of rape/sexual abuse/incest abortion should be allowed
but those cases are very rare and the majority of abortion cases are simply done out of convenience to the mother. i mean think about this what is more important a womans convenience or the killing of an INNOCENT UNBORN BABY.
and to take it a step farther what the difference between a mother having an abortion 2 months before delivery date and her killing her baby two months after it is born??????
agreed
how is raising taxes going to stimulate the economy???? how is taking money out of rich peoples hands going to encourage them to go out and hire more people and to expand their businesses??? how is raising taxes for middle class people going to encourage them to go spend more money on good when they have less money to start of each month. i mean i dont know if the economy has you penny pinching but for the sake of arguement lets say it is. how is taking more money from your paycheck going to encourage you to go spend more???? and well as far as i know poor people pay LITTLE TO NO TAXES anyway!
i mean am i the only one here who thinks the government has no business taking that much money from people.
oh and about the poll are you sure it wasnt that they were IN FAVOR of a tax cut??????
i ain't no american, but to be honoust; Bush is probably the most idiotic president that has ever been elected in the us. and to be more honoust i don't like americans at all, stupid and arrogant. always mingling in business that doesnt even consern 'em.You Americans dont even belong in the country at all , but all because that stupid idiot columbus accidently bumped into it with his ship when he was drinking he fucked up the entire world. oh but bush should not be realected for all us residents sake.
fuck my english.
pz's.
fuck my english.
pz's.
I won't be on for the next couple of weeks but I gotta speak on this. I am against the slaughtering of soon to be babies but at the same time I am pro choice for women.
I believe women do have a choice.
And that is their choice for using contraceptives or not.
It is their choice to open their legs and let anyone in or not.
But their choices end there....
There is absolutely no justification for the killing of babies.
Hell, there isn't even any justification for killing at all.
All this talk about women choice but what about the baby's choice?
Everyone should have a chance for life.
It is barbarric to take a baby's only chance at life just because a women is not prepared to be a mother.
Hell, if you ain't prepared to be a grown woman then why act like one when making love?
Excuses and excuses bro.
Your mother should've never gotten pregnant while being a drug addict. I understand that shit happens, that is why we need to educate people.
But we shouldn't screw babies over for our mistakes.
No need for abortion, but education.
You talk about rape?
Well rapists should be locked up for life. A more severe price for their crimes will make a rapist think twice.
No excuses though, how many babies have been aborted because of rape?
I can't think of any. So once again, lets not make it legal to kill innocent babies just because of rape or any other excuse....
Maybe and just maybe, abortion should be excluded to rape victims only. But there are other options as well.
It would be a good time for all religious folks to step up and make it their repsonsability to house children spawned from rape....
Something to think about....
Peace,
Miggidy
I believe women do have a choice.
And that is their choice for using contraceptives or not.
It is their choice to open their legs and let anyone in or not.
But their choices end there....
There is absolutely no justification for the killing of babies.
Hell, there isn't even any justification for killing at all.
All this talk about women choice but what about the baby's choice?
Everyone should have a chance for life.
It is barbarric to take a baby's only chance at life just because a women is not prepared to be a mother.
Hell, if you ain't prepared to be a grown woman then why act like one when making love?
Excuses and excuses bro.
Your mother should've never gotten pregnant while being a drug addict. I understand that shit happens, that is why we need to educate people.
But we shouldn't screw babies over for our mistakes.
No need for abortion, but education.
You talk about rape?
Well rapists should be locked up for life. A more severe price for their crimes will make a rapist think twice.
No excuses though, how many babies have been aborted because of rape?
I can't think of any. So once again, lets not make it legal to kill innocent babies just because of rape or any other excuse....
Maybe and just maybe, abortion should be excluded to rape victims only. But there are other options as well.
It would be a good time for all religious folks to step up and make it their repsonsability to house children spawned from rape....
Something to think about....
Peace,
Miggidy