Worst terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11 and not a word from Bush

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#29
Worst terrorist attack since 9/11? In Al Hilla over here a few weeks ago a terroist detonated a car bomb killing over 130 innocents and wounding over 250. 2 people being murdered is not the worst terrorist attack. How can you say that is even worse then the court shooting last week, where a DEA agent was even killed???? I think this is the worst thread since 9/11. out.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#30
Please read before you post. The title of this thread is:


Worst terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11 and not a word from Bush




Now I'll post this again with bold letters on the words you should pay attention to:


Worst terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11 and not a word from Bush


With the FACTS being stated why would you mention an attack overseas when it has NOTHING to do with an attack on us soil?


How can you say that is even worse then the court shooting last week, where a DEA agent was even killed???? I think this is the worst thread since 9/11. out.


LMAO! Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't this thread created BEFORE the courthouse shooting?
 
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#31
Ok mabye i was not in the Peramiters of the title with the incident i posted. However, these events were in the last month, this is a doubble homicide by some idiots, it is not a terrorist attack. If you want to call it a terrorist attack there have been FAR worse on US soil after 9/11 then 2 old people getting wacked in their home.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
37
#32
KleanKut said:
Ok mabye i was not in the Peramiters of the title with the incident i posted. However, these events were in the last month, this is a doubble homicide by some idiots, it is not a terrorist attack. If you want to call it a terrorist attack there have been FAR worse on US soil after 9/11 then 2 old people getting wacked in their home.

correct me if I'm wrong but isn't a terrorist organization an organization formed to provoke terror in citizens? Now, you tell me how an attack committed by a terrorist organization is not a terrorist attack?

I'll agree wit you on the second part of your statement... the acts following the USA PATRIOT act are prime example.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#33
@KleanKut,

Neo Nazi's = Terrorist Group.

Regardless if you disagree that this was the worst terrorist attack ON US SOIL, it still doesnt take anything away from the article.


"Had the judge and her family been targeted by Al Qaeda, there would have been an uproar in Washington, in all likelihood accompanied by another roundup of hapless Muslim immigrants.

The official indifference to these killings speaks volumes about the nature of the so-called war on terrorism proclaimed by both major political parties. It is not directed at protecting the American people from acts of violence, but rather serves as the pretext for furthering a violent militarist agenda on the part of Washington itself."
 
Mar 6, 2005
28
0
0
#34
I would hope no one disagrees with the fact that the Neo-Nazis are a terrorist group.

But 2-0: How do you come to the conclusion that this is the worst terrorist attack since then? Did you do it by the numbers (2 people)? The deliberate marking of family of government officials?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#35
I honestly don’t know if it is in fact the worst or not. A more correct title would be “ONE OF the worst terrorist attacks on US soil…” but as I mentioned, the title was purposely intended to grab people’s attention and spark interest in the thread, which obviously it has done.
 
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#36
I agree that Neo Nazis are a terrorist groub and a bunch of idiots. however i dont think this was a terrorist attack. A terrorist attack is ment to worry people on a large scale and usaly to promote the groups cause. So if they killed like 30 blacks and jews then i would consider it a terrorist attack, this wasnt aimed at a terror for the masses. This was more in the way of orginized crime and trying to get one of these sumbags off the hook. so in closing Neo Nazis = terrorist orginization. This attack = not terrorist attack.
 
Mar 6, 2005
28
0
0
#39
Well 2-0, you do realize that such tactics used by, say...Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity would have you questioning their credibility up and down right?

I can just imagine your responses had Mclean made a post with an outrageously powertagged title like this.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#40
Out of all the topics this one in particular has acquired most of your attention.

Whatever tactics by Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are irrelevant to this thread. I posted a thread to intentionally grab people’s attention. Woopdy doo, if it is that big of a deal, you’ll never see me “spin” another title again. Can we move on now?