WITH ELECTIONS COMING UP WILL BIN LADEN OR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BE FOUND?

[2-0-Sixx]

Anyone see the latest on Osama on the news? Cornered? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Wouldn't be suprized. Perfect timing for elections:beard:

 

[Ethereal]

because Israel ISNT a threat to us. if and when we invade people/nations it is because they are a threat to our country and/or our interests

Then why didn't we invade Saudi Arabia? 9/11 is evidence that they were a threat to U.S. interest and our way of life.

 

[kontac]

no but i bet we go to war with some one

 

[WHITE DEVIL]

Look at Iraq on a map. It's right next to us. They could invade at any moment.

 

[2-0-Sixx]

^^good point

 

[WHITE DEVIL]

LMFAO

 

[nefar559]

^^ must have been the map McHuevos was looking at


LOL...Classic

 

[EDJ]

LOL AT ALL THESE CONSERVATIVES, PRO-PATRIOTIC MUTHA-FUKAS TRYIN' TO CLEAN SHIT ON UP.

 

[HERESY]

@COCK IN THE BOX RESOLUTION 1441 DID *NOT* GIVE AMERICA AUTHORITY TO ATTACK. IF IRAQ REFUSED TO COMPLY UNDER 1441 AMERICA WAS TO MEET WITH THE SECURITY COUNCIL AND GO FROM THAT POINT. AMERICA WAS NOT TO WAGE WAR FOR MYSTERIOUS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THAT AMERICA NOW SAYS IRAQ DIDN'T HAVE. 1441 DOES ***NOT*** GIVE ***ANYONE*** THE RIGHT TO DECIDE IF AND WHEN IRAQ SHOULD FACE CONSEQUENCES ***EXCEPT*** FOR THE SECURITY COUNCIL. THE LANGUAGE USED IN 1441 IS "SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES". DEFINE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES FOR US. THAT COULD MEAN MORE SANCTIONS NOT ATTACKS AND INVASIONS. PLEASE DON'T LIST 678 AND 687 TO BACK YOUR CLAIMS. IN FACT I DON'T SEE WHY YOU LISTED 1441 WHEN WE WENT OVER THIS BEFORE.


SINCE IRAQ DOES NOT HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (NONE HAVE BEEN FOUND) HOW IS IT IN MATERIAL BREACH? IF IRAQ NEVER HAD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION HOW ARE THEY NOT COMPLYING?!?

BTW I NO LONGER PRAY FOR YOUR SWIFT DEMISE....I PRAY FOR YOUR SLOW...AND PAINFUL DEMISE....


:HGK:

 

[2-0-Sixx]

^^^

 

[HERESY]

@COCK IN THE BOX ARE YOU GOING TO RESPOND?