Whiners Get Fadangled By Ravens!! Gay Buttboy Gaycia Doin Booboo!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#42
BornSin said:
look lady, i was comparing McNabb and Vicks stats ONLY.....
it doesnt matter you fuckin homo. the point is you resorted to statistics to try to prove Vick is a better QB than McNabb is. if you have to resort to stats, then more than half of the league's starting QB's are better than Vick is.

and here's sumthin for your faggot ass.... Mike Vick had 80 more attempts than McNabb did, and only 20 more completions. McNabb completed roughly 58% of his passes while Vick completed around 54%. when throwing 400+ passes that 4% makes a big difference.


because they are similar types of quarterbacks......
OK let's bring in another similar QB who's also better than Micheal Vick.... Steve McNair. similar style right? McNair can run, he's mobile, the difference is he can pass too. he threw for more yards than Vick, had a higher completion percentage (61%), a better QB rating, more TD passes, and he also racked up decent yards on the ground. if Vick could play like this man he would be the best QB in the league, but he doesnt.

most of the other QB's are mainly pocket passers (minus a few)....
a few? more than a few. Jeff Garcia, Daunte Culpepper, Aaron Brooks, Rodney Peete, Donavon McNabb, Jeff Blake, Kordell Stewart.... they all leave the pocket frequently, BUT THEY STILL GET PASSES OFF.

and have 100 or so more attempts than does vick......
they also have 100 or so more completions than he does....

plus their rushing #'s dont compare to his.....thats where he makes up for it.......
him running the ball does not make up for him not passing it. that's wut a running back is for pendejo.

if he were to throw the ball 600 times a year, hed have just as good of numbers of anybody.....
wrong again. with his completion percentage he'd only complete a little over 300 of them. if every QB threw 600 times a year he'd still be in the same position on the QB rankings.

the bottom line, faggot, is that vick is in fact a very accurate passer and knows how to throw the football.....
based on previous performances, you're wrong again.

what you dont seem to get is that he also has the most dangerous legs in the game and knows how to use them as well.....
you're wrong again. i know very well he has the most dangerous legs in the game and i do know he knows how to use them.... my point is he needs to have the most dangerous ARM, not legs. if he ups his passing game he'd be a major force to be reckoned with. wut you guys dont seem to get is that he lacks wut a true QB needs: the ability to throw the damn football and to complete those passes. he's an electrifying player and it's fun to watch him like i said before, but he's just not a GOOD QUARTERBACK YET. get off his nuts already faggot.
 
May 10, 2002
1,511
0
0
44
#43
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
you're wrong again. i know very well he has the most dangerous legs in the game and i do know he knows how to use them.... my point is he needs to have the most dangerous ARM, not legs. if he ups his passing game he'd be a major force to be reckoned with. wut you guys dont seem to get is that he lacks wut a true QB needs: the ability to throw the damn football and to complete those passes. he's an electrifying player and it's fun to watch him like i sai before, but he's just not a GOOD QUARTERBACK YET. get off his nuts already faggot.
why does he NEED to have the "most dangerous arm not legs" in the game to be successfull? he's been very successfull doing what he's done since his days at Va tech..... the object is winning football games.....if that calls for him to run more, he can do that.....if it calls for him to pass more, he can do that as well......

and I dont get why you continue to say he doesnt have the ability to throw the ball and complete passes.....cause he does....its as simple as that.....
 

BAMMER

Siccness Gray Hair
Apr 25, 2002
5,828
479
83
47
Auburn Wa
www.dawgman.com
#44
There's no doubt in my mind Vick is good.He probably will be great in due time,but it's faulty to think he's the premiere QB in the league right now,cuz he has'nt done shit except show flashes of brilliance,and nothing else.Winning is the key.He don't have to win the Bowl every year,but if he can consistantly have his team in the playoffs,and winning division titles with 12-4,11-5 type records,we'll start givin him props,until then.......
 
May 10, 2002
1,511
0
0
44
#45
while he might not have the division titles and he hasnt been succesfull over a long period of time as others have (as of yet).......there is still no other player in the league i would rather have on my football team right now than michael vick....
 
May 8, 2002
2,127
0
0
47
#46
Alot of yall dont make any sence at all. Yes the Niners are struggling but they havent played up to their potential all year. A big disapointment this year with alot of decisions to make in the off season! But Czar you can not talk after your cowgirls keep losing and have givin up 1st place in their division! Ya'll might get knocked out of playoff contetion! So all I gots to say is BOW DOWN BITCH!!!!!HAHAHAHAHAA
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#47
Yo ness get off my dick trick!! Uza faggot for that shit!! If u cant take it mane go to the sista's forum trick!! Your whiners are gay just like u!! And tone dog the 5-7 I can talk as much as I want to because u said the Cowboys would like 5 games, and that your whiners was gonna win the bowl!! Look at the picture now!! Your team is booboo and gay, while my Boys are 8-4 and has done way better than u haters thought!! Yall cant take the reality of this shit so yall also better off goin to......www.friendlysports.com.....Tricks!!!! GOT EM!!!
 

Dosia

Sicc OG
May 2, 2002
748
2
18
44
#49
cant read all this bullshit..but i do know a few things

some jerks on here are annoying as fuck to read there shit
vick is tight...one of the best in the league...think if you calculated running yards into qb rating...i think soon every team will have a qb that can run too...it just adds another thing that the defense needs to worry about...

im perved as fuck reading a bunch of bullshit
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#50
in case you didnt know, football is a team sport. Mike Vick did not and can not win games by himself. all i said wuz he is not the best, and that wuz my opinion. then a couple homos went off on me while riding Vick's nuts talking bout how im wrong and i dont know shit. i know more than you think, and none of you have proved me wrong. all i got to say is get off my nuts and vacate Mike Vick's nuts as well, and everything will be fine. BornGay brought stats into the picture to prove Vick is a better QB than McNabb, well stats dont lie rght? then they prove Vick is not the best.

Dosia, you know why they dont calculate rushing stats into QB ratings? BCUZ QB'S ARE NOT RUNNING BACKS. rushing is the RB's job not the QB. every QB in the league has taken off for sum yards, but Vick does it 100+ times a year.... that's 100+ passes he should have gotten off (or at least tried to get off).

a lot of you fools are on Vick's bandwagon bcuz of all the hype he's gotten.... ignore the real, fuck it. that's up to you fools. but the statements ive made about Vick are 100% accurate and stats back me up, so please make sure you know wut you're talking about before you try to clown me. talking bout "you dont know shit." please. get a clue.
 
May 10, 2002
1,511
0
0
44
#51
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:

that's 100+ passes he should have gotten off (or at least tried to get off).
so you would rather see him force a pass than take off through an open hole? forced passes lead to interceptions.....and vick does not throw INT's often......

and actually anal, only reason cats was jumpin on you like that is cause you termed vick as "no good"......and both you and i know he is far from "no good".....

whatever tho, we'll all get to watch how he does against a tough panthers defense after being out for some 15 weeks.....im pretty sure its espn's sunday night game....
 
Sep 15, 2003
148
0
0
#52
I knew my raiders were not going anywhere, but all yall SANF's thought yall actually had a chance, sorry guys, but like I said TOLD YALL THEY WERE NOT GOING ANYWHERE EITHER. No TO for you guys next season either, sorry, I know it hurts.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,221
5
38
42
#54
E to da P said:
I knew my raiders were not going anywhere, but all yall SANF's thought yall actually had a chance, sorry guys, but like I said TOLD YALL THEY WERE NOT GOING ANYWHERE EITHER. No TO for you guys next season either, sorry, I know it hurts.
You're gay as fuck. You mean to tell me you didn't have high hopes for your defending AFC champions? You're trippin'. You knew the Raiders werent goin' any where when they were officially elminated from the playoffs and had a 3-9 record.

Raiders are sorry as fuck this year, and yes...the 9ers are almost as bad. But at least we got more wins.

9ERS BITCH!!
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#55
Yo booboolyrics go ahead and laugh at the rings, but they are real and u have to deal with the fact that they are shiny to!! Hahahahah!! GOT EM!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#56
BornSin said:
so you would rather see him force a pass than take off through an open hole? forced passes lead to interceptions.....and vick does not throw INT's often......
you must not watch too many ATL games. one particular game last season the announcers were talking about the same shit i have been.... that Vick runs when it's not necessary, and on one of the plays that he ran on they looked downfield and saw 2 out of 3 receivers open. Vick should have passed! he does that shit a lot. and i know Vick doesnt throw INT's often, it's bcuz he doesnt pass too often either! LMAO!!!!

and actually anal, only reason cats was jumpin on you like that is cause you termed vick as "no good"
that, plus the fact you fools are swinging from Vick's pubes.

......and both you and i know he is far from "no good".....
when it comes to passing, he is no good. i wuz wrong to call him no good bcuz he is a good player, he's just not as good as you dick riders make him out to be.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#57
E to da P said:
I knew my raiders were not going anywhere, but all yall SANF's thought yall actually had a chance, sorry guys, but like I said TOLD YALL THEY WERE NOT GOING ANYWHERE EITHER. No TO for you guys next season either, sorry, I know it hurts.
the difference between our teams is ours has the talent to go sumwhere, yours doesnt. we may not have TO but the only talent on your roster will be in a retirement home next year. all your good players except C. Woodson, J. Fargas, and J. Porter are practically senior citizens.