What is up with people quoting people and adding to it?!?!?!
- Thread starter HERESY
- Start date
why dont you go find those quotes and show them to us instead of just popping off at the mouth.
what i did was quote ENTIRE PARAGRAPHS and put dots/periods inbetween to SHOW that i cut some other senseless dribble of yours to save space and not have to have multiple quotes
i never added words to what you typed.
what i did was quote ENTIRE PARAGRAPHS and put dots/periods inbetween to SHOW that i cut some other senseless dribble of yours to save space and not have to have multiple quotes
i never added words to what you typed.
He's talking about me. Heresy has this ego LOL J/P bro, but when he's debating he doesn't want you to quote him and get that quote used on him. There was this CAT named K-NINE LMAO! He used a quote I made it pretended Heresy told me to fuck off, and he said Heresy wasn't a true follower of Christ. K-nine was stressed because me, Heresy and EDJ refuted some of his facts, and he wouldn't admit defeat until 300 posts later, and yeah. Heresy has this big ego, and it won't go away LOL HAPPY NOW HEMP! I'M SLANDERING MY BOSS!
ya, i know, but he is bringing up bullshit from the past where i would quote him, then he would claim that i changed his quotes when that never happened.
plus he has about 20 groupies that think he is god that are good is misdirecting attention towards other things to get the heat off of him..
plus Hershey thought he could talk shit because i rarely come on here anymore
plus he has about 20 groupies that think he is god that are good is misdirecting attention towards other things to get the heat off of him..
plus Hershey thought he could talk shit because i rarely come on here anymore
Mcleanhatch, I have stated my claim SEVERAL times now. The reason why you were subjected to all the variations of your name (started by me and carried out by every member of the board) was because you took one part of my statement, combined it with another part of my statement, and made somethign COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than what was intended or implied.
No elipses marks were given, mcleansnatch, and I'm not going to dig it up because it probably got lost when the site went down. And actually mcleanugget, I tell people that I consider you a half way decent guy, but that your actions rubbed me the wrong way. In addition, if I wanted to talk about you in an inappropriate way, you'd know about it and this wouldn't be the thread. :eyecross:
No elipses marks were given, mcleansnatch, and I'm not going to dig it up because it probably got lost when the site went down. And actually mcleanugget, I tell people that I consider you a half way decent guy, but that your actions rubbed me the wrong way. In addition, if I wanted to talk about you in an inappropriate way, you'd know about it and this wouldn't be the thread. :eyecross:
RETRACT MY OPENING WORDS FOR WHAT? I DIDN'T SEE ANY OTHER PERSON QUOTING ME AND ATTRIBUTING WORDS TO ME EXCEPT FOR YOU. I SAW WHEN STOCKTON MADE ADD ONS TO EDJ'S POST, AND I SAW WHEN YOU DID THE SAME. ARE YOU SAYING, IT WASN'T YOU WHO MADE THE QUOTE BUT YOU WERE QUOTING SOMEONE ELSE WHO QUOTED ME? AGAIN, I NEVER SAID WHAT YOU SAID I SAID. I NEVER CUSSED AT THE GUY, AND HE SAW MY POST WHICH WAS UNEDITED AND HE REPLIED TO IT EXACTLY ONE MINUTE AFTER I MADE IT. EVERYONE HERE SAW YOUR POST, AND IT WAS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT I TYPED.
NOW, IF YOU DID NOT EDIT MY QUOTE, AND YOU WERE QUOTING SOMEONE ELSE WHO DID EDIT MY QUOTE BY ALL MEANS TELL ME, SO I CAN ADDRESS THE INDIVIDUAL. I STATED IN THE OTHER THREAD THAT I DON'T GET MESSAGES WHEN NEW REPLIES ARE MADE, SO IF STOCKTON DID THIS I DIDN'T SEE IT, AND PROOF OF THIS CAN BE FOUND IN ME REMINDING HIM OF THE FACT THAT HE DID IT TO EDJ AND IT WASN'T COOL. IF HE DID IT TO ME, I DIDN'T SEE IT BECAUSE IF I DID I WOULD HAVE ADDRESSED IT.
NOW, IF YOU DID NOT EDIT MY QUOTE, AND YOU WERE QUOTING SOMEONE ELSE WHO DID EDIT MY QUOTE BY ALL MEANS TELL ME, SO I CAN ADDRESS THE INDIVIDUAL. I STATED IN THE OTHER THREAD THAT I DON'T GET MESSAGES WHEN NEW REPLIES ARE MADE, SO IF STOCKTON DID THIS I DIDN'T SEE IT, AND PROOF OF THIS CAN BE FOUND IN ME REMINDING HIM OF THE FACT THAT HE DID IT TO EDJ AND IT WASN'T COOL. IF HE DID IT TO ME, I DIDN'T SEE IT BECAUSE IF I DID I WOULD HAVE ADDRESSED IT.
I don't ever remember you proving me wrong, but if you did you would have joined an elite club that probably consists of 2 and a half members and a dead cat.
I let go of things, forgive and forget and don't trip when people insult me, clown on me, or do whatever it is that makes them feel good. The point is have some INTEGRITY even when you are responding to a person you don't like and don't put words in a persons mouth.
I was defeated in the police thread? LMAO!
Let's direct everyone here so they may take pity on you.
http://siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=208704&page=3
Thanks for the compliment.
Me being proven wrong here doesn't take away from my pockets nor does it make me melt like the wicked witch on the wizard of oz. Can I say the same for you? UNLIKELY, and the fact that you came with such a retarded claim is enough to have you commited in the state mental hospital of your choosing.
Yes, you do win! Free room and board, all the meds you can ever want, no harrassment by police, and a physical aid to wipe the snot, drool and vomit from your skin tight michael jackson "beat it" shirt.
Let's direct everyone here so they may take pity on you.
http://siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=208704&page=3
Thanks for the compliment.
Me being proven wrong here doesn't take away from my pockets nor does it make me melt like the wicked witch on the wizard of oz. Can I say the same for you? UNLIKELY, and the fact that you came with such a retarded claim is enough to have you commited in the state mental hospital of your choosing.
Yes, you do win! Free room and board, all the meds you can ever want, no harrassment by police, and a physical aid to wipe the snot, drool and vomit from your skin tight michael jackson "beat it" shirt.
First off, I congratulate you on your SUPERB use of the English language. Good job, junior.
Lets go over the claims you made in that thread.
Source cited or proof of this # was never given. However in response to that I provided the following which was based on one of my CJ teachers knowledge (he is a retired SGT.)
"around 75 to 85% have them (THEM REFERRING TO LAPTOPS), but a lot of them function in different ways depending on the agency. Depending on how new they are they can bring up your record and your I.D. to prove who you are, and some can even get into the FBI data base, but it would have to go through dispatch."
but some people are still relying on dispatch to give them criminal history, and even then when the systems are old it takes awhile for dispatch to relay the information because of the delay, so they may not bother with it."
EMPHASIS MINE.
Again, no evidence was given to validate the claim, and again, my source was my teacher:
"Far less departments have cameras and you would think that more had them because of all of the police liability issues. The reason why less departments have them is because they are more expensive than the computers, require a lot of space and require a lot of service maintenace."
My source of information is one of my CJ teachers who is a retired SGT. Your source of information is your ass.
In that thread we didn't discuss engines. :dead:
Considering your recent exhibition of the english language I think you need to reconsider the moronic part....:dead:
In response to my source and validation you responded with this:
LMAO! THAT was your reply to numbers WHICH DESTROYED YOUR CLAIM, and my response to your lunacy was:
Your response to that? Crickets...:dead:
Lets go over the claims you made in that thread.
Source cited or proof of this # was never given. However in response to that I provided the following which was based on one of my CJ teachers knowledge (he is a retired SGT.)
"around 75 to 85% have them (THEM REFERRING TO LAPTOPS), but a lot of them function in different ways depending on the agency. Depending on how new they are they can bring up your record and your I.D. to prove who you are, and some can even get into the FBI data base, but it would have to go through dispatch."
but some people are still relying on dispatch to give them criminal history, and even then when the systems are old it takes awhile for dispatch to relay the information because of the delay, so they may not bother with it."
EMPHASIS MINE.
Again, no evidence was given to validate the claim, and again, my source was my teacher:
"Far less departments have cameras and you would think that more had them because of all of the police liability issues. The reason why less departments have them is because they are more expensive than the computers, require a lot of space and require a lot of service maintenace."
My source of information is one of my CJ teachers who is a retired SGT. Your source of information is your ass.
In that thread we didn't discuss engines. :dead:
Considering your recent exhibition of the english language I think you need to reconsider the moronic part....:dead:
In response to my source and validation you responded with this:
LMAO! THAT was your reply to numbers WHICH DESTROYED YOUR CLAIM, and my response to your lunacy was:
He visits the department once a month, and does ride alongs with his son, but yet he hasn't been in a new car in ages... 
The point is he is more credible than you'll ever be. He spent his time in the front seat of one. You spent most of your life in the back seat of one. Who are we to believe? Again, I got my #'s directly from my teacher, and if need me I'll get some books for further citing. You on the other hand come with some far out number that NO ONE but yourself can validate. Who would the average person reading this believe?
The point is he is more credible than you'll ever be. He spent his time in the front seat of one. You spent most of your life in the back seat of one. Who are we to believe? Again, I got my #'s directly from my teacher, and if need me I'll get some books for further citing. You on the other hand come with some far out number that NO ONE but yourself can validate. Who would the average person reading this believe?